- Feb 9, 2007
- 10,188
- 3,632
Leafs shouldn't give this package for someone who doesn't come with an extension. Would be an absolute error. CBJ deal doesn't work from either side for reasons already mentioned.
Proposal: Leafs - Canucks , leafs - Bluejackets
- Thread starter cup67
- Start date
That’s underwhelming for Vancouver. I’d ask for more as their GM. Probably Knies.
No chance in hell Kekäläinen would give Laine a C. Never. BTW, he really doesnt trade for or draft Finnish players usually.
- May 3, 2021
- 8,927
- 8,955
turkulad
Registered User
Liljegren is 23. I'd say go for it as a VAN fan. Would move Engvall immediately to another team as a rental to get another future asset.
Kerfoot+7th to never make fun of our proposals again
Dion TheFluff
Registered User
- Jun 22, 2015
- 4,141
- 3,652
ACC1224
Super Elite, Passing ALL Tests since 2002
- Aug 19, 2002
- 76,763
- 43,413
TheKrebsCycle
Throwing Confetti for Perfetti
ToDavid
Registered User
- Dec 13, 2018
- 4,177
- 5,248
Timmins is looking like a decent reclamation project a handful of games in but hold your horses lol.
Pass on both.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Vancouver passes, Not enough for both Horvat and Schenn retained.
And once again the Blue Jackets aren't trading their Captain Boone jenner
And once again the Blue Jackets aren't trading their Captain Boone jenner
Canadian Canuck
Hughes4Calder
I'd be willing to bet that when Horvat is traded there will not be a 23 year old top 4 RHD included in the deal.
TheDoldrums
Registered User
People do not understand who Timothy Liljegren is and how valuable he is to the Leafs. He's one of the best defenders on a really good defensive team. He's 23, signed super cheap for the next couple of seasons and will still be a RFA after that. The Leafs are not moving him, full stop.
Outside of Matthews/Marner/Nylander he's as untouchable as anyone else on the team imo.
Outside of Matthews/Marner/Nylander he's as untouchable as anyone else on the team imo.
TheGroceryStick
Registered User
Is Boone Jenner still a great on the dot? He was great in 'shwa from what I remember. Always liked the motor and leadership on that guy...doubt they'd trade em
Accept the trades then!!!!!
thusk
Registered User
Mmm let me thing about getting a 23 y/o top 4 dman for at least 4 year, a 1st and and B prospect
For a #2 NHL C for 20 game+ 1 playoff run and a 6th D
Mmm im not sure... liljegren alone right now how he actually play probably having more value than the entire deal leafs get...And the funiest thing, you think nuck will reject a top 4 etablish dman for a rental...
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
You just said it yourself, Horvat is a pure rental for the Leafs, So Dubas isn't trading Lilly for a rental and there's no way Dubas is paying Horvat between $8,500,000 to $9,000,000 per to play 3C in Toronto either.
thusk
Registered User
Hes a rental player for every team...like every player with one year remaining, a player team need to trade because they will lost him for nothing for around 20 game+ playoff and maybe find an agreement to extend before he reach the market.. thats exactly what a rental player is.. you cant expect price of horvat sith a 5- 6 years contract, he dont have it
So nUck will get value for a one year remaining horvat
Sundinisagod
****
This is the type of trade leafs management in the early 2000's would've made. The type of trade which looks bad the following season once Liljegren cements himself as a top pairing D and the leafs have nothing to show for it because Horvat would inevitably walk as a UFA.
Dude has Kerfoot being sold off for just a 2nd or 3rd.
What are you talking about?
BlueBaron
Registered User
Lol. There is no world where we trade Liljegren let alone for a rental.
Op has a major disconnect.
Op has a major disconnect.
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
Salary Cap: Pens '24-'25 Salary Thread: The Crosbicles Volume XIX- Latest: MeinerEiner
-
