Latest on the Arizona Coyotes Arena ordeal

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Divine

Registered User
Dec 18, 2010
19,161
13,330



According to two separate sources, Smith has even offered to purchase the Coyotes for a significant sum, well beyond the current valuations per Forbes and Sportico, and is willing to cover the relocation fee on top of it. Whether that offer was formally in writing or something vocalized is semantical, but the overall price of doing so would be less than the expansion fee and the NHL remains firm on its position on the Coyotes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Headshot77

Bad Photoshopper
Feb 15, 2015
3,997
2,026
Pittsburgh
I think the Coyotes get stuffed into Houston on the cheap, and you'll see $1b expansion teams in Utah and Atlanta in short order.

Fertitta isn't willing to buy an expansion franchise and we all know the NHL wants the Houston market. Alex Smith and the Atlanta people are willing to pay expansion prices so you can't waste that on a cheap Yotes team.
 

Dread Clawz

LAWSonic Boom
Nov 25, 2006
27,852
9,723
Pennsylvania
Makes sense, the owner doesn't seem capable or apparently trustworthy enough to get an arena deal done.

If they do move somewhere else they could always go back to Arizona in the future with a better owner and an arena ready to go.
Friedman says this will definitely happen. Arizona will happen, whether now or in the future. He also thinks the timing of Ryan Smith with SLC wasn't a coincidence. However, I saw something in local Phoenix news where Meruelo is set to buy a huge tract of empty land in North Phoenix next to the Marriott. But it would still take weeks for land commission to approve it. Maybe that's what the NHL is waiting for?
 

Llewzaher

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
4,546
2,146
North America
Just because Friedman and Servalli do a podcast , in response to the NHLPA guy and Bettman being questioned at the All Star break, changes absolutely nothing to the fact that AM and the Yotes are looking at different spots of land to build an arena. Only 1 spot of land was made public a few moths ago, and another one will be in the next day or so. Nothing else has been leaked , or made public. Everything else is speculation. It’s only being talked about because some people thought the All Star break was a deadline, and are thinking the Yotes missed it.( and likely to draw attention away from the WJ players and the trials)

supposedly ( and I may have misunderstood) there is a section of “Reserve” land that is a worse case scenario that could be signed tomorrow, but that wouldn be done unless all other options were exhausted. According to some on the ARZ boards who live in the area.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Summer Rose

jetsmooseice

Up Yours Robison
Feb 20, 2020
1,863
2,337
Out of all the poorly thought out processes that place sports franchises in cities they don’t belong in, I don’t really feel that denying Texas a second hockey team is one of them.

Utah at least has hosted the Winter Olympics, has a winter sports draw, etc. A second team in Texas would get the “bastard red-head stepchild treatment” about 2 seconds after the start of a local HS football broadcast. I get that Houston’s gained loads of northern transplants, but speaking as someone who lived in Austin for work long enough to note the lack of Stars presence in the city where the Stars’ AHL affiliate plays, I truly believe SLC would be the “thirstier” franchise……kind of like how Winnipeg’s tumult over their team overshadows their size, but to a lesser extent.
I never understood the clamour for SLC, which is a smaller market that already has a well established NBA team as a winter sport already soaking up a large share of disposable income in that area. SLC has a smaller population than Calgary and if you proposed Calgary getting a NBA team to play alongside the Flames, people would think you were nuts. But for SLC everyone just nods their heads.

Why not a city like San Diego which is significantly larger than SLC and doesn't have a NBA team to compete with? Their arena is legitimately old and undersized so it's the perfect situation for an owner to try and extort a free shiny new arena from local authorities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WhataKnight

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,477
21,375
MN
I honestly feel its not a lost market.

In my opinion, i think its best to relocate the team and potentially try again in a few years. Try to find stable ownership who can secure land. It would suck for the locals and fans in the short term but i think hockey in arizona needs a hard reset.
Not sure about the market, but it would be interesting to see what would happen if they had a team that went far into the playoffs on a consistent basis.

Having said that, the issue in ARI is clearly about the ownership. They seem to be trying to pull the classic Al Davis "I'm holding you hostage, give me a better deal" with the ARI city(s), but are doing a really bad job of it.
 

AintLifeGrand

Burnin Jet-A
Apr 8, 2009
5,946
2,085
GreatestSnowOnEarth
I never understood the clamour for SLC, which is a smaller market that already has a well established NBA team as a winter sport already soaking up a large share of disposable income in that area. SLC has a smaller population than Calgary and if you proposed Calgary getting a NBA team to play alongside the Flames, people would think you were nuts. But for SLC everyone just nods their heads.

Why not a city like San Diego which is significantly larger than SLC and doesn't have a NBA team to compete with? Their arena is legitimately old and undersized so it's the perfect situation for an owner to try and extort a free shiny new arena from local authorities.
While SLC has some environmental issues (diminishing GSL, SW Mega Drought, Diminishing Water Supplies to sustain the fastest growing metro in the country), it is very appealing as a NHL city for the following reasons

1. Economy: Salt Lake City may be per capita one of the most affluent cities in the country. A few reasons for this 1. Mormon Industriousness- I have never met a poor Mormon. I lived in SLC for the better part of 5 years, my company is HQ'd in Utah, and I still spend a ton of time there- It is a very wealthy city (check out the property values), Mormons are hardworking and as a whole earn more than the average American by a significant multiple.

Then factor in the huge influx of California and East Coast transplants who have moved to the state to staff high paying Tech Jobs (I'll touch on this more in pt #2) and other white collar professions. These people are drawn to Utah for the skiing and the outdoors- They have a much higher pre-disposition to be hockey fans. While the Jazz and the U are huge, SLC is a winter sports/outdoor sports town. There will be a ton of enthusiasm and fan support.

2. The Wasatch Front is a Tech Juggernaut: The new name for Utah county is the Silicon Slopes. There is a ton of VC money backing a plethora of successful, rapidly growing Mormon Tech Companies. The I-15 corridor from Sandy to Provo is dotted with brand new glass buildings branded by abstract/obscure names of tech companies like: Domo, Homie, Qualtrics etc.

3. Fastest Growing State/Metro in the country with a high birth rate: Look up statistics. Utah is growing too damn fast- part of the reason I moved out. Takes 90 minutes to drive 5 miles to get shred Snowbird on a Friday Pow Day.

4. Excellent Hockey Infrastructure: Becuase of the Olympics there are a ton of high quality rinks and hockey infrastructure in place. A NHL team could turn the region into a major US breeding ground of hockey talent.
 

FerrisRox

"Wanna go, Prettyboy?"
Sep 17, 2003
20,780
14,035
Toronto, Ontario
I just think the NHL could do more. It is a small city, be trading one small market for a new small market. Houston makes far more sense to me as a major city that is untapped so far if you get good ownership it has the potential to be a strong market.

Arizona is one of the largest markets in the NHL, you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
 

brentashton

Registered User
Jan 21, 2018
14,781
21,378
I just think the NHL could do more. It is a small city, be trading one small market for a new small market. Houston makes far more sense to me as a major city that is untapped so far if you get good ownership it has the potential to be a strong market.
Phx is top 10 population size in North American markets.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Matias Maccete

banks

Only got 3 of 16.
Aug 29, 2019
3,734
5,420
maybe just move them to atlanta

That would make my suggested Atlanta team name more appropriate. I suggested the Atlanta Phoenix, as in the firebird.

How appropriate would it be for Atlanta's 3rd NHL team be the ones that used to be in Phoenix!? A reference to rising from the ashes, and a callback to the former city? Perfection.
 

TheBeastCoast

Registered User
Mar 23, 2011
31,962
32,752
Dartmouth,NS

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad