Speculation: Larry Brooks: Canucks possibly going to make a run at Lafreniere

Bettman Returnz

Why so serious?
Jul 28, 2003
4,788
2,675
BC
Visit site
Can’t see any of this coming to fruition… I get the connection with castonguay but highly doubt rangers don’t ask for a lot inreturn. Don’t think Miller would be that. But hey I’ve been wrong before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nucklehead Supreme

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
Sponsor
May 25, 2014
46,442
32,278
To New York: Miller, PoolMan, Costmar, 2023 4th

To Vancity: Lafreniere, 2022 2nd, 2023 3rd
 

nergish

Registered User
Jun 1, 2019
829
940
We'll take offers on Miller, Horvat, and Boeser.
But trading any of them one-for-one for Lafreniere is not very appealing imo.
 

AirGut

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
2,232
2,962
Larry Brooks Bus Stop
puckpedia.com
I would imagine Horvat or Boeser would be NYR's ask here. It wouldn't be just for Lafreniere either but he'd be the meat of the package. I could see VAN massively overpaying and giving whatever NYR wants purely out of love interest for Laf. All in all I just see this as usual click-bait farming from Brooksie.


seriously don't count out Boeser in play here everyone seems to forget he was being discussed for awhile and suddenly it all just disappeared, not to mention NYR is in dire need of a goal-scoring RW
 

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,763
31,700
Sure they can run, but NYR would look like fools trading him so early
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,809
21,671
Am I the only one that doesn't think Lafreniere is worth shit?

I suggest a 2nd or maybe a young blue-chip with comparable upside but that upside and potential certainly isn't going to be that of a 1OV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diamonddog01

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,896
42,347
This is basically Brooks 'wondering' if this could happen, his words. Basically a non story.

it's funny how he also thinks if Rangers were to swap Laf with someone like Pettersson in a blockbuster deal, they couldn't find a way to make it work cap wise....
 

EdJovanovski

#RempeForCalder
Apr 26, 2016
30,057
60,427
The Rempire State
No way would I give up on Laf already for Horvat or Miller. It would have to be something built around Pettersson or Hughes. If it were for Horvat I would also want Podkolzin & Hoglander, probably still would rather not.
 

kanucks25

Chris Tanev #1 Fan
Nov 29, 2013
7,269
4,335
Surrey, BC
No way would I give up on Laf already for Horvat or Miller. It would have to be something built around Pettersson or Hughes. If it were for Horvat I would also want Podkolzin & Hoglander, probably still would rather not.

No way would I give up on Petey already for Zibanejad or Kreider. It would have to be something built around Fox or Panarin. If it were for Zibanejad I would also want Lafreniere & Kakko, probably still would rather not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nucklehead Supreme

EdJovanovski

#RempeForCalder
Apr 26, 2016
30,057
60,427
The Rempire State
No way would I give up on Petey already for Zibanejad or Kreider. It would have to be something built around Fox or Panarin. If it were for Zibanejad I would also want Lafreniere & Kakko, probably still would rather not.
I know you're being sarcastic but youth & higher ceiling is worth more. I'd rather have Petey than Zibanejad or Kreider lol. They're not going to give up on their first 1st overall pick in franchise history at age 20 for a 2nd line center.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deathb4disco

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
38,976
7,918
Montreal, Quebec
What I don’t get is why Vancouver are trying to trade Miller in the first place? All I hear is about how he’s their best forward and a great fit etc

We have no prospect depth thanks to the disastrous Benning era and aren't likely to be more than a playoff bubble for another year or two. So we're using Miller's value to essentially recover. In an ideal scenario, I'd much prefer to keep him but Benning was just that horrible.
 
Feb 19, 2018
2,687
1,873
As a Canucks fan I would probably entertain a Pettersson for Lafrenier + Kakko + Schneider.
If the offer was made I’m sure both teams would think hard. Rangers were trading up for him in the draft and had to settle for Anderson. Canucks only do this due to new management and zero ties. Rangers only do this if they think he will bounce back and become a top 10 player in the league.
 
Feb 27, 2002
37,943
8,028
NYC
As a Canucks fan I would probably entertain a Pettersson for Lafrenier + Kakko + Schneider.
If the offer was made I’m sure both teams would think hard. Rangers were trading up for him in the draft and had to settle for Anderson. Canucks only do this due to new management and zero ties. Rangers only do this if they think he will bounce back and become a top 10 player in the league.
I'm thrilled you would consider it. The silence you would hear wouldn't be the Rangers considering it, it would be them laughing too hard to speak.
 

JohnHodgson

Registered User
May 6, 2009
4,153
1,542
Am I the only one that doesn't think Lafreniere is worth shit?

I suggest a 2nd or maybe a young blue-chip with comparable upside but that upside and potential certainly isn't going to be that of a 1OV.

The "first overall" shine is running out quick. If next year is disappointing, I don't think he can fetch more than a late first at that point in time.

With all the crazy hype around his minor league production (and comparisons to Crosby), I actually did some research and he's not even close to the top for career PPG in the QMJHL.

Ehlers, Radulov and Drouin all have higher career PPG in the Q.

Giroux and Lafreniere have similar QMJHL PPGs and yet Laffy was a generational prospect and Giroux was picked 22nd overall?

QMJHL is notoriously a weak league too. Laffy might be go down as one of the most overhyped prospects of all time if he continues his trajectory of a top six winger.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gianni

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,768
8,623
Canucks aren't trading Petey, so that part can be put to bed.

Regarding Laf, I have no problem with taking a gamble on that kind of talent. Yeah, he hasn't shown much yet but if he had he would be absolutely untouchabe.

I could see the Canucks offering Boeser and a 2nd, but the problem is that Boeser is RFA with a 7.5 million dollar QA.

But he would fit that team like a glove.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nucklehead Supreme

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad