Player Discussion Lane Hutson Part 2

Habs10Habs

Retired
Sponsor
Aug 22, 2006
60,981
18,740
Let’s agree to disagree, I think Lane having to cover for a slow footed, aging dman only makes his transition to the NHL more challenging, not less.
Savard has lost a step or two. But he's not the type of defenseman that will allow himself to be out of position. He will stay back and allow Hutson to do his thing.

Hutson probably has more offensive talent in his pinky finger, than Savard has ever had in his entire body. In saying that, he brings a lot of experience both on and off the ice. Personally, until Savard's traded. I'd love to see Hutson with Savard, if Hutson makes the opening night roster.

Out of curiosity, who would be your first choice to play with Hutson?
 

MTL Dirty Birdy

Registered User
Aug 29, 2021
1,356
1,546
He showed pretty clearly that at best he was going to be a 3C and he ended up being a rotational 4th liner. Pretty median outcome for a guy like that. The one game gave people hope there was top 6 offense in there but there never really was, none of his offensive tools were all that good.
I remember when he was drafted he was sen as a safe/high floor player for the third line and low ceiling that 2nd line absolute best. If I recall ceiling was mikko Koivu lite
 

SOLR

Registered User
Jun 4, 2006
13,244
6,801
Toronto / North York
Savard has lost a step or two. But he's not the type of defenseman that will allow himself to be out of position. He will stay back and allow Hutson to do his thing.

Hutson probably has more offensive talent in his pinky finger, than Savard has ever had in his entire body. In saying that, he brings a lot of experience both on and off the ice. Personally, until Savard's traded. I'd love to see Hutson with Savard, if Hutson makes the opening night roster.

Out of curiosity, who would be your first choice to play with Hutson?

A 25 years old Reinbacher probably.
 

Rapala

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
42,437
39,511
Montreal
I think he starts in Montreal under the close eye of management similar to how they developed Slafkovsky.
I still think it could go either way.
My main concern is I just don't see both Matheson and Hutson as being our top 4 LD I think it would be a disaster.
I also don't see us annointing Hutson as a our go to offensive catalyst out of the gate.
So are we better off playing Hutson sheltered 3rd pairing minutes and PP2 time in the NHL or top line minutes and PP1 in Laval?

Matheson is the odd man out if Hutson becomes what everyone thinks he can be.
The problem is I don't think we are ready to move him just yet.
I guess what I'm feeling is I don't see the vaunted "balance" Hughes talks of with both Hutson and Matheson in the line up.
I'd also like to see just how well Hutson can QB a PP with top line players in the pro leagues.

Start the camp already... :help:
 
  • Like
Reactions: bsl and SwiftyHab

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,404
106,548
Halifax
I still think it could go either way.
My main concern is I just don't see both Matheson and Hutson as being our top 4 LD I think it would be a disaster.
I also don't see us annointing Hutson as a our go to offensive catalyst out of the gate.
So are we better off playing Hutson sheltered 3rd pairing minutes and PP2 time in the NHL or top line minutes and PP1 in Laval?

Matheson is the odd man out if Hutson becomes what everyone thinks he can be.
The problem is I don't think we are ready to move him just yet.
I guess what I'm feeling is I don't see the vaunted "balance" Hughes talks of with both Hutson and Matheson in the line up.
I'd also like to see just how well Hutson can QB a PP with top line players in the pro leagues.

Start the camp already... :help:

I do think they respect Matheson's defensive ability more and there's a possibility that he might become a safer defenseman when he isn't the only one charged with creating offense from the back-end.
 

BehindTheTimes

Registered User
Jun 24, 2018
7,480
10,329
I still think it could go either way.
My main concern is I just don't see both Matheson and Hutson as being our top 4 LD I think it would be a disaster.
I also don't see us annointing Hutson as a our go to offensive catalyst out of the gate.
So are we better off playing Hutson sheltered 3rd pairing minutes and PP2 time in the NHL or top line minutes and PP1 in Laval?

Matheson is the odd man out if Hutson becomes what everyone thinks he can be.
The problem is I don't think we are ready to move him just yet.
I guess what I'm feeling is I don't see the vaunted "balance" Hughes talks of with both Hutson and Matheson in the line up.
I'd also like to see just how well Hutson can QB a PP with top line players in the pro leagues.

Start the camp already... :help:
keep the puck in the offensive zone. That’s the best defense. I would have no problem with a dcorp of Hutson/Reinbacher, Guhle/Mailloux and matheson/jackeye/harris/barron in whatever combos make the most sense. It’s not a traditional defense to be sure, but I think it has potential to be completely overwhelming for opposing teams to have these young, offensive minded d’s pushing the puck up Ice all night long. I actually think it’s a winning combination. They just need a bit more experience.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bsl and BLONG7

Vachon23

Registered User
Oct 14, 2015
19,175
23,463
Victoriaville
keep the puck in the offensive zone. That’s the best defense. I would have no problem with a dcorp of Hutson/Reinbacher, Guhle/Mailloux and matheson/jackeye/harris/barron in whatever combos make the most sense. It’s not a traditional defense to be sure, but I think it has potential to be completely overwhelming for opposing teams to have these young, offensive minded d’s pushing the puck up Ice all night long. I actually think it’s a winning combination. They just need a bit more experience.
During the season sure it will be fun to watch, but you won’t win during the playoffs with that
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,323
25,723
I do think they respect Matheson's defensive ability more and there's a possibility that he might become a safer defenseman when he isn't the only one charged with creating offense from the back-end.

This is my thinking as well.

I can't wait to see Hutson and Matheson as a 1 - 2 punch, coming in waves. And in late games where we need a goal, they should be good together.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings

WeThreeKings

Demidov is a HAB
Sep 19, 2006
95,404
106,548
Halifax
1724678199172.png


There ya go - the photo was never photoshopped, you can see with not sitting flat on a chair and not in that type of lighting, his muscles were accentuated but not photoshopped. You can see exactly how the lighting and sitting would have made his quads look bigger than they are, but still a decent size.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
49,592
71,856
Texas
View attachment 903243

There ya go - the photo was never photoshopped, you can see with not sitting flat on a chair and not in that type of lighting, his muscles were accentuated but not photoshopped. You can see exactly how the lighting and sitting would have made his quads look bigger than they are, but still a decent size.
The kid has a strong looking lower body...period.
 

Shutdown

Registered User
Sep 7, 2009
1,707
811
Montreal
View attachment 903243

There ya go - the photo was never photoshopped, you can see with not sitting flat on a chair and not in that type of lighting, his muscles were accentuated but not photoshopped. You can see exactly how the lighting and sitting would have made his quads look bigger than they are, but still a decent size.
I have played and been around hockey for longer than most of the posters on this board have been alive and I have never see a player double the size of his quads in such a short time.....I don't think I have ever seen these lower body gains in any hockey player regardless of how long the gap if I am being honest and for an ectomorph like Lane it is next to impossible.


also i experience concussions on a daily basis.
 

Habs 4 Life

No Excuses
Mar 30, 2005
41,214
5,090
Montreal
View attachment 903243

There ya go - the photo was never photoshopped, you can see with not sitting flat on a chair and not in that type of lighting, his muscles were accentuated but not photoshopped. You can see exactly how the lighting and sitting would have made his quads look bigger than they are, but still a decent size.
Which one is Lane? :sarcasm:
 

badfish

Habs fan in ON
Sponsor
Nov 12, 2005
2,849
3,108
ON
View attachment 903243

There ya go - the photo was never photoshopped, you can see with not sitting flat on a chair and not in that type of lighting, his muscles were accentuated but not photoshopped. You can see exactly how the lighting and sitting would have made his quads look bigger than they are, but still a decent size.
It's clear to me we have a serial photoshopper out there, this one is obviously shopped to
Screenshot 2024-08-26 110510.png
o
 
Last edited:

Kaiden Ghoul

Youppi va t’il devoir chauser ses patins calvaince
Jan 19, 2020
1,085
837
We have a good group of two way player now and on the way

Slaf Suzuki Roy Dach Beck

If they ice two player of those everytime Hutson is on the ice, i would be less woried unless he goes saiyan training on his D
 

Paddy17

Registered User
Apr 10, 2021
2,032
4,117
View attachment 903243

There ya go - the photo was never photoshopped, you can see with not sitting flat on a chair and not in that type of lighting, his muscles were accentuated but not photoshopped. You can see exactly how the lighting and sitting would have made his quads look bigger than they are, but still a decent size.
Hutson looks good in white.
 

Frank Drebin

Likes are suspended, sorry for inconvenience
Sponsor
Mar 9, 2004
35,490
23,132
Edmonton
that doesn't look like an overly powerful golf swing lol

fairways lane

Got some kwads on him tho
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad