Speculation: LA Kings Offseason Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

FSL KINGS

Registered User
May 10, 2021
2,937
2,635
Carter looked pretty toasted last year.

Looks like they plan on having him as 4C this year. I'll be curious to see how he does in that role.
Sounds like Carter is slowing way down from Pit fans. He can still win faceoffs & what some teams are running in the bottom 6, probably not the worst option. Salary might be a bit high.

Pavel Zacha is pretty legit now. Not a 1C but a good 2C similar to whatever Paul Stastny was considered most of his career.
I'm just ripping on Boston. Still angry about that Lucic trade. Thankfully they blew those picks or we'd still be hearing about it.

They can both f*** off
It's ok.
The pain will fade with time.
 

Statto

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 9, 2014
5,699
8,056
Thankfully they blew those picks or we'd still be hearing about it.
It always interests me how/why people do that as if we’d have taken the same player and/or developed them in the same way. The pick has a value but whatever happens thereafter is irrelevant in reality.

Even if we take the same player they could end up significantly better/worse and so on. They might end up blocking a player that became a key piece…. The butterfly effect continues. If the trade value of a pick is right/wrong at the time of the trade that’s the only way to evaluate it IMO. If it’s for specific players then that’s where you evaluate things down the line. Obviously it’s different when talking about the 1OA pick when it’s someone like McDavid in that spot.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Schrute farms

FSL KINGS

Registered User
May 10, 2021
2,937
2,635
It always interests me how/why people do that as if we’d have taken the same player and/or developed them in the same way. The pick has a value but whatever happens thereafter is irrelevant in reality.

Even if we take the same player they could end up significantly better/worse and so on. They might end up blocking a player that became a key piece…. The butterfly effect continues. If the trade value of a pick is right/wrong at the time of the trade that’s the only way to evaluate it IMO. If it’s for specific players then that’s where you evaluate things down the line. Obviously it’s different when talking about the 1OA pick when it’s someone like McDavid in that spot.
This is a bit of a special situation. At the time Boston went off the board. The commentators mentioned it in real time. There were multiple players that were ranked to go in the next group that ended up turning out.

As for the butterfly effect, basically traded 2X 1st to Boston that could have landed 2 top6 forwards. That would greatly effect the path of the team. It was still a bad trade & a bad trade in real time. Despite Lucic playing well that year.

Believe Edmonton traded their pick to NYI just after for Reinheart (D) that didn't pan out.
 

Statto

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 9, 2014
5,699
8,056
This is a bit of a special situation. At the time Boston went off the board. The commentators mentioned it in real time. There were multiple players that were ranked to go in the next group that ended up turning out.

As for the butterfly effect, basically traded 2X 1st to Boston that could have landed 2 top6 forwards. That would greatly effect the path of the team. It was still a bad trade & a bad trade in real time. Despite Lucic playing well that year.

Believe Edmonton traded their pick to NYI just after for Reinheart (D) that didn't pan out.
Oh sure I realize that but from my end it makes zero difference as to what Boston did with those picks. For us it was a bad trade.
 

Surf Nutz

Hockey Remote Viewer With A Frozen Finger
May 16, 2022
2,902
1,003
In the tube
clubnami.com
They think Spence is going to be on the roster?
As an Australian born hockey player he will be on the trip down under.
If the Kings are smart they will start him on the 3rd pair with Bjornfot as they top paired in the AHL last year.
He can be evaluated an/or shopped while Clarke gets a solid footing in the AHL and then comes up when Blake makes moves before the trade deadline.
Most likely a deterrent and a #1 tender, depending on any injuries for LTIR cap space and any voids that creates.
 
Last edited:

Brodeur

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
26,775
17,594
San Diego
Might not be the right place for this, but it was a pretty interesting video. It crazy how one little gaffe could have such a huge impact.


Along those same lines, a couple more interesting what ifs:


In the 1998-99 season finale, Vancouver gave up a winning goal with four seconds remaining in regulation. Had they secured at least a tie, the extra point would have flip flopped them with the Islanders pre-lottery.

1. Tampa (47 points)
2. Atlanta (expansion)
3. NY Islanders (58 points)
4. Vancouver (59 points)

Assuming the same lottery result would have vaulted Chicago into #4, does this mean the Sedins get split up? In Brian Burke's autobiography, he mentioned that Chicago approached him about trading #3 since the Blackhawks wanted both Sedins.


In the penultimate game of the 2003-04 season, Chicago gave up a last minute tying goal and then lost in overtime. Had they hung onto the victory, the pre-lottery order would have been:

1. Pittsburgh (58 points)
2. Washington (59 points)
3. Chicago (60 points)

In reality, Washington won the lottery from the #3 spot. So if Chicago wins that game, Washington maybe ends up with Cam Barker (instead of Ovechkin) and who knows how the next 20 years go for them.



This season, Columbus lost in regulation against the Devils with 1.4 seconds left. Had they gotten to OT, the extra point would have flipped spots with Chicago for the Bedard lottery. But we'll see how big the delta between Bedard and Fantilli is.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,452
66,470
I.E.
Along those same lines, a couple more interesting what ifs:


In the 1998-99 season finale, Vancouver gave up a winning goal with four seconds remaining in regulation. Had they secured at least a tie, the extra point would have flip flopped them with the Islanders pre-lottery.

1. Tampa (47 points)
2. Atlanta (expansion)
3. NY Islanders (58 points)
4. Vancouver (59 points)

Assuming the same lottery result would have vaulted Chicago into #4, does this mean the Sedins get split up? In Brian Burke's autobiography, he mentioned that Chicago approached him about trading #3 since the Blackhawks wanted both Sedins.


In the penultimate game of the 2003-04 season, Chicago gave up a last minute tying goal and then lost in overtime. Had they hung onto the victory, the pre-lottery order would have been:

1. Pittsburgh (58 points)
2. Washington (59 points)
3. Chicago (60 points)

In reality, Washington won the lottery from the #3 spot. So if Chicago wins that game, Washington maybe ends up with Cam Barker (instead of Ovechkin) and who knows how the next 20 years go for them.



This season, Columbus lost in regulation against the Devils with 1.4 seconds left. Had they gotten to OT, the extra point would have flipped spots with Chicago for the Bedard lottery. But we'll see how big the delta between Bedard and Fantilli is.


it feels like the margin is always pretty close on those too

heck even our kings 'jumped' out of 2nd to last to 4th to last after beating the sens in what would end up the literal final game before covid cut the season short, a few of us were like OF COURSE we would and they'd kill the season right when we lost our spot :laugh:

then of course the draft lottery pulled us back to #2
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brodeur

YP44

Registered User
Jan 30, 2012
27,351
7,687
Calgary, AB
it feels like the margin is always pretty close on those too

heck even our kings 'jumped' out of 2nd to last to 4th to last after beating the sens in what would end up the literal final game before covid cut the season short, a few of us were like OF COURSE we would and they'd kill the season right when we lost our spot :laugh:

then of course the draft lottery pulled us back to #2
LA won the last game of the year must mean we are champs. Are words i said too much during that time.
 

rt

Clean Hits on Substack
Yotes fan coming with trade idea.

Jan Jenik reportedly wants a fresh start. He and Kaliyev dominated the OHL once upon a time. Still a promising prospect. Has good size and skill, positional versatility. His biggest differentiator is what a pain in the ass he is. World class pest.

AZ could use LD depth. I’m seeing LA has 7 D with one way deals. Plus Spence and Clarke. Feels like too much. Bjornfot is on a one-way and has lost waiver exemption, I believe. Is Bjornfot still in the long term plans? Or is it change of scenery time?

Jenik for Bjornfot?
 

Johnny Utah

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
11,189
3,391
Santa Monica, CA
Been watching Hodgson highlights all summer - wouldn't be shocked if he gets a call up or makes the Kings.

He is similar to Brendan Lemieux minus the penalties, but he is a right handed shot - something the Kings lacked and even now more so with Vilardi, McEwen and Kupari gone. They basically traded Lemieux because he was a LH for McEwen a RH.

Ontario now has Doty back to handle the dirty work, with Helenius learning the role and Kevin Connauton there just in case.

Of course, for another year, Ontario is 100x tougher than LA.
 

Fishhead

Registered User
Jul 15, 2003
7,306
5,764
PNW
Yotes fan coming with trade idea.

Jan Jenik reportedly wants a fresh start. He and Kaliyev dominated the OHL once upon a time. Still a promising prospect. Has good size and skill, positional versatility. His biggest differentiator is what a pain in the ass he is. World class pest.

AZ could use LD depth. I’m seeing LA has 7 D with one way deals. Plus Spence and Clarke. Feels like too much. Bjornfot is on a one-way and has lost waiver exemption, I believe. Is Bjornfot still in the long term plans? Or is it change of scenery time?

Jenik for Bjornfot?
There isn't much LD depth in LA either, with only Anderson tied down to a long deal. I don't think the value is terrible in a vacuum, but it would probably take something more substantial to get Tobi out of LA just because we have the same LD needs. I doubt any more changes are made, to be honest. Even if they wanted to get better value out of Bjornfot they probably couldn't because taking anything back with higher salary is a no-go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kinghock
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad