KingsHockey24
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2013
- 14,665
- 13,519
I'm going to need you to DM immediately just for verification.So you must see that ad often with Kyle Clifford getting stroked.
I'm going to need you to DM immediately just for verification.So you must see that ad often with Kyle Clifford getting stroked.
You aren't a fan of The Strokes?Not a rumor but wtf HF? Not sure why this ad is being shown here.
sean walkerAny interest in Nils Hoglander for one of your RHD prospects?
Sick. Maybe the ad algorithm confused pucks with pox as in monkeyAt first I though they were slow dancing and then I realized that no….this is a hand job.
What would it take from the Canucks, with Hoglander included, for Helge Grans?sean walker
dont think the kings are in the rush to move grans after just trading away faber. hoglander isn't the main piece they'd want even if they even were moving him.What would it take from the Canucks, with Hoglander included, for Helge Grans?
Any interest in Jack Rathbone? Offensive minded LHD. Redundant in the Canucks' system with all of the PMD, but could be a good add to the Kings' long term defensive situation.
How's Walker defensively?dont think the kings are in the rush to move grans after just trading away faber. hoglander isn't the main piece they'd want even if they even were moving him.
Could be wrong but I thought it was reported he was one of the guys with a separated shoulderfair points for sure. Did we ever determine if Iafallo was injured? His play was brutal and if Tmac was playing an injured Iafallo over any healthy body would be a baffling move.
Jack Rathbone has injury issues and smallWhat would it take from the Canucks, with Hoglander included, for Helge Grans?
Any interest in Jack Rathbone? Offensive minded LHD. Redundant in the Canucks' system with all of the PMD, but could be a good add to the Kings' long term defensive situation.
He was, definitely.Could be wrong but I thought it was reported he was one of the guys with a separated shoulder
I would take the Hoglander. He’s a Swede and kind of a pest. Just no idea where he’d fit.
Looks like a negotiation standoff for now. Knowing Durzi he'll tells his agent to hold out for the money he wants.. Ando wont make any wavesso what are durzi and anderson waiting for. checked to see if their arbitration was today, theyre not even eligible
I’m sure they’re negotiating for a fair offer, but they have little to no bargaining position. Would you sign the qualifying offer if you knew you were worth twice the offer? Maybe they’re hoping for an offer sheet from another team, but that’s not gonna happen anytime soon. Sucks for them.so what are durzi and anderson waiting for. checked to see if their arbitration was today, theyre not even eligible
What do you mean? Do you know them personally or this just dumb speculation?Looks like a negotiation standoff for now. Knowing Durzi he'll tells his agent to hold out for the money he wants.. Ando wont make any waves
Negotiations.so what are durzi and anderson waiting for. checked to see if their arbitration was today, theyre not even eligible
Negotiations.
There are many times when one side waits to hear from another. Maybe the Kings want to make a trade to free up cap space.
I would still be shocked if Anderson accepted less than $3 million, considering he's been a top pairing LD for multiple seasons. Might not get much more, given his low offensive production, but the Kings don't have much room.
Durzi has a small sample size, but so far looks like he should get ~$2 million.
Ultimately, though, it's only a concern if they aren't signed by training camp. The more they miss time as an unsigned player (I avoid the term "hold out"), the higher risk they run of injury and being out of practice due to missing training camp days.
If a goalie as shitty as Petersen got 5 million with no sample size and just merely existing. Durzi will easily fetch 2.No way Durzi should get $2M
Durzi, in his rookie year, scored 27 points in 64 games. That's .42 points/game. These are the other defensemen who put up those numbers:No way Durzi should get $2M
Walsh: Durzi 5 mil...Don't forget Durzi's agent is Allan Walsh.
While I think it's all a nothingburger right now I guess you can't discount shenanigans by wannabe Scott Boras.
Jay Grossman represents Mikey and his brother and mostly low-leverage clients and doesn't seem to have a history of nearly the same sort of delays. His firm used to have huge clients in Rinne, Leetch, Zhamnov and other Russians including Kovy and the Radulovs but they seem to have fallen off hard in recent years especially after a 2004 conflict. Yes, he was the Kovalchuk saga agent.
For both Durzi and Anderson, it will depend on term. I can see 2x2 easy for Durzi, quick bridge, good for player and team. I could see Mikey getting more on longer term too, as they've been big on him since draft day, like 3x4. Doubt either guy wants a cheap one year deal at this point. I doubt negotiations are contentious but there's a large spectrum of results that will take time.
Durzi, in his rookie year, scored 27 points in 64 games. That's .42 points/game.Durzi, in his rookie year, scored 27 points in 64 games. That's .42 points/game. These are the other defensemen who put up those numbers:
Oliver Kylington: $2.5 just signed last week as an RFA)
Adam Boqvist: $2.6 (RFA)
Chris Wideman: $0.75 (UFA)
Mike Matheson: Just signed as a UFA for $4.785
Samuel Girard: $5 million (signed as an RFA)
Heinola: $0.833 (ELC)
Alex Goligoski: $2 million (UFA)
Nate Schmidt: $5.95 (UFA)
The bolded are the ones which need to be taken into consideration, because RFAs get compared to other RFAs and they use comps.
The only one who is getting less than $2 million is Heinola, who is still on his ELC.
I'm not saying offensive numbers are the only drivers, but these are the types of comparisons Durzi's camp could use.
What comps are you using and why?
I would trade Durzi for good return…Walsh: Durzi 5 mil...
Blake: He's played 64 games...
Walsh: you're paying for his future
Blake: I hate dealing with you...