King'sPawn
Enjoy the chaos
- Jul 1, 2003
- 23,140
- 23,974
I think at this point, Blake has made his bed. He has three major holes: LD, toughness/resilience, and goaltending.People will criticize Blake for "doing nothing" when usually doing nothing is the best thing to do.
These are the sources and the difficulties of each type of capital to trade for these pieces:
- 1st round pick. The Kings already traded last year's. Trading first round picks multiple years in a row has to have some definite playoff impact, because you're sacrificing many futures. But will the pieces put the Kings over the top?
- NHL-ready prospects (Byfield, Spence, Bjornfot, Kaliyev, Clarke). All these players have roles they are expected to fill in the most. Kaliyev is the most "expendable" per se, because players like Fiala and Kempe are still pretty young. But with the Kings wanting to play a more offensive game, do you want to trade that? Same with Byfield. Bjornfot is the least offensive in terms of ability, but he's also one of the only NHL-ready LD in the organization (aside from Anderson). So, that leaves with Spence and Clarke, both of which are having unreal production in their respective leagues.
- Prospects that aren't ready. These just don't have as much value. You're not going to get much for Turcotte or Grans. Fagemo could qualify as NHL-ready, but he's also not beating any of the above for a spot. I also don't know how much value he really has.
If Blake can get some sort of decent player for a mid-round pick, OR if he can acquire an NHL-ready prospect with similar projectability as the player traded away (for example, if Kaliyev is traded for an NHL-ready, high-tier LD or goalie at the same age, then it's a great trade).
But frankly, I'd rather Blake not make a big trade. Ride out the season and address some of the weaknesses with free agency or try to draft some more quality players.