All Mod Cons
Registered User
- Sep 7, 2018
- 11,825
- 12,882
Nylander is not soft to you?But you're not speaking to things Dubas has gotten wrong. You've largely just made incorrect statements about the team, the players on the team, Dubas, the things he has done, etc., and then dismissed all of the endless good to focus exclusively on playoff series wins - something you haven't had any consistency about when it comes to other teams and GMs.
Completely incorrect. There's just a massive difference between "questioning him" for legitimate things and what many here are doing.
No. He's not somebody that's going to go in and fight or throw bone-crushing hits, but that doesn't make somebody soft.
There are both positives and negatives to a 5 year term - the most common post-ELC term for a player of that caliber. We have him locked in for less term right now, but it reduced the cap hit to allow us to keep all of our top guys and have more space to build around, on top of it ensuring that the next contract wouldn't stretch into significant decline years.
11 million for a UFA Tavares was not a "massive overpayment" at all (which is why you saw multiple teams offering even more), and he's maintaining quite well.
Of course it's not good that we lost in the playoffs. I'd much rather we had won. But representing it in such a misleading way, and ignoring all context and the actual reasons we lost, and ignoring everything else about this team and what they've done and how we're set up now and into the future, all because you're upset about the fact that it happened, doesn't do anybody any good.
Muzzin and Brodie contracts also expire at the same time, and Tavares the next year.Not necessarily. The league is likely heading to a larger cap increase right as Nylander/Matthews contracts are expiring in 2024-25.
If this happens the front office will have more wriggle room to fit guysSalary cap could go up in 2024-25, just in time for Maple Leafs and Canucks
The expected salary cap increase for the 2024-25 season could prove to be good timing for the Toronto Maple Leafs and the Vancouver Canucks.www.sportsnet.ca
We're not signing him now. We signed him then to a very reasonable UFA contract. You're going to tend to extract less impact relative to cap hit as UFA contracts age, and the cap has temporarily stagnated because of the pandemic, but Tavares has actually maintained quite well. He's still a high level player, and there's really no reason to think he's due for some significant drop off anytime soon. People act like he's 40 and falling apart. He's 31.11 million is NOW an overpayment.
This is the age when many "power" forwards start their steep decline.We're not signing him now. We signed him then to a very reasonable UFA contract. You're going to tend to extract less impact relative to cap hit as UFA contracts age, and the cap has temporarily stagnated because of the pandemic, but Tavares has actually maintained quite well. He's still a high level player, and there's really no reason to think he's due for some significant drop off anytime soon. People act like he's 40 and falling apart. He's 31.
It's funny that you're simultaneously attempting to label him both soft and a power forward, but also no, not really. 31 is not very old, Tavares hasn't dealt with a lot of injuries, and elite players tend to maintain well through this age range.This is the age when many "power" forwards start their steep decline.
The contract is not "horrific". My god, the dramatics.The contract is horrific in the now
He was not massively overpaid, and that's a ridiculous way to evaluate contracts. Tavares was one of the last elite UFA forwards signed before the pandemic flat cap, so of course he's high on the cap hit list.JT has the 5th highest cap hit in the NHL. Now, go see where he rates in terms of goals, and points. It isn't anywhere near 5th. He is massively overpaid.
I never said Tavares was soft. I said Nylander was. JT is the age where guys who play his kind of game fall off.It's funny that you're simultaneously attempting to label him both soft and a power forward, but also no, not really. 31 is not very old, Tavares hasn't dealt with a lot of injuries, and elite players tend to maintain well through this age range.
The contract is not "horrific". My god, the dramatics.
He was not massively overpaid, and that's a ridiculous way to evaluate contracts. Tavares was one of the last elite UFA forwards signed before the pandemic flat cap, so of course he's high on the cap hit list.
Actually, you accused our entire core of being soft, including Tavares. Then, when it didn't suit your argument anymore, he suddenly turned into a power forward, so you could try and justify your baseless claim that he's about to fall apart. One would think that Dubas acquiring an elite power forward would be something you'd enjoy.I never said Tavares was soft. I said Nylander was.
No, he's not. He's 31. Fact is that elite players tend to maintain well through the ages that he's signed, especially when not dealing with any chronic injury, and he's shown no sign of an imminent drop off.JT is the age where guys who play his kind of game fall off.
I wouldn't add another elite forward because we have 4 and there isn't enough cap or roster space for another one. That doesn't change the value that Tavares has added to this team.You didn't answer if you think it'd be a good idea to pay 11 million for another 80 point guy. Is it?
Yep, and that's totally understandable to anybody that understands how contracts work. Tavares was one of the last elite UFA forwards signed before the pandemic flat cap, so of course he's high on the cap hit list. It doesn't make the contract bad.You can parse it any way that makes you feel better but he has the 5th highest cap hit in the league.
Not really. He was a mid-20s RFA signing a post-ELC contract after a singular shortened year in the NHL where he was below PPG.Hard looking at these numbers seeing an ascending Kaprizov with over 100 points and only getting better for 9 million per
They have big D, but it will be seen are they going to sacrifice their offense for defense, because you have to if you want to limit our chances only to perimeter. You have to play full team defense and that limits your offense. Will they play their own game or counter us. It was pretty clear that Canadiens had to do that and Columbus played that way whole year.They have a big D like the Habs and if they keep the Leafs to the perimeter and Vasi does not give up cheap goals, it won't really be because we got "goalied" but the usual suspects will say it was. Let's hope we do not cross that bridge.
It's hard to tell. Many believe it's actually the fans making the transactions. The fanbase forced the GM to do it, or something like that.Now that dubas team has set all the reg season records… does he get credit for that or no?
Now that dubas team has set all the reg season records… does he get credit for that or no?
DK? Hilarious. I like when people stumble upon new terminology.Mr Dunning Kruger I don't think you understand how the cap works. If we were to play "cap games" Muzzin would have not been activated until the playoffs and we'd have 5+ mil more cap space to play with at the deadline.
Explain to me in detail the cap game we're playing with Muzzin and Kase, how are we benefiting from this? We're carrying Muzzin's full cap hit for him to play sporadically without being able to bring in an equally priced replacement defender, it's quite literally the opposite of what Vegas/Tampa did in similar situations.
If a team was withholding healthy players there would be ramifications from the PA and the league, especially Toronto.DK? Hilarious. I like when people stumble upon new terminology.
You honestly believe Kase couldn't be playing right now? Why isn't he?
How about Mrazek? You think he's still hurt and they didn't use his injury status to manipulate the cap. Yes, there are legitimate usages of it for injuries, and there are also very illegitimate usages. Honestly, tell me you believe the cap just magically works out year after year and all of it is done with 100% integrity. No Maple Leaf in the Dubas era was ready to return but held out to manipulate the strapped cap? Hey, let's forget about ever, let's talk about RIGHT NOW, too. Can't wait to read your reply.
The audacity to speak to Dunning-Kruger while believing over the last several years that everything just works out perfectly and Dubas/Pridham are just "masterful". You probably applaud recruiters at your college football university of choice, too. All on the up and up. No rules ever broken. Masterful job of recruiting.
No.If a team was withholding healthy players there would be ramifications from the PA and the league, especially Toronto.
Kase got his bill rung pretty hard last time out and mrazek has been dealing with that growing for much of the season. Sounds like more made up imaginary bs from you as per usual.
Would you do me the same solid in return and explain the implications of Keefe's attached post-game comment after the Caps game?Mr Dunning Kruger I don't think you understand how the cap works. If we were to play "cap games" Muzzin would have not been activated until the playoffs and we'd have 5+ mil more cap space to play with at the deadline.
Explain to me in detail the cap game we're playing with Muzzin and Kase, how are we benefiting from this? We're carrying Muzzin's full cap hit for him to play sporadically without being able to bring in an equally priced replacement defender, it's quite literally the opposite of what Vegas/Tampa did in similar situations.
Kase has a history of concussions.Do you think Kase isn't playing because he's not healthy enough? Or, is the reason he can't play is we don't have the cap space? I'll bet you think his injury will magically be timed up to end when the playoffs start. Such great fortune? Earlier in the season, we would move guys around as needed extending injury times as needed to remain cap compliant. It is not natural...it is all manipulated. Again, tell me why Kase isn't playing? He cant. No cap space to activate him. So, we can't use a player who can help us because of the cap. Make no mistake he 100% could play but only can't due to the cap. It's a dance that goes on year after year.
I don't see how he couldn't play given were carrying an extra forward and called up Dahlatrom last night. Those two are more than Kase makes.Would you do me the same solid in return and explain the implications of Keefe's attached post-game comment after the Caps game?
Do you think Kase isn't playing because he's not healthy enough? Or, is the reason he can't play is we don't have the cap space? I'll bet you think his injury will magically be timed up to end when the playoffs start. Such great fortune? Earlier in the season, we would move guys around as needed extending injury times as needed to remain cap compliant. It is not natural...it is all manipulated. Again, tell me why Kase isn't playing? He cant. No cap space to activate him. So, we can't use a player who can help us because of the cap. Make no mistake he 100% could play but only can't due to the cap. It's a dance that goes on year after year.
If the Leafs wanted to bring Kase back and the circumstances were set back 30 games, and Bunting had a larger salary to cover Kase's cap number, Bunting would be shelved to use space to get Kase back and Bunting's injury would be extended out until they could repeat the process. Ain't nobody to do that for poor Kase right now. So Bunting will stay on the cap. All manipulation. All of it. Leafs are harmed often by this manipulation but many see it as just bad injury luck. No. It is cap manipulation tying hands as in the case of Kase right now.
Kase isn't playing because he had a recent concussion after a long history of concussions that almost ended his career. We have the cap for Kase to play.You honestly believe Kase couldn't be playing right now? Why isn't he?
Mrazek was pulled mid-game a few weeks ago and has a groin injury that took him out for 6 weeks.How about Mrazek?
It doesn't just "magically work". It takes a lot of planning and maneuvering to make sure we're good with the cap. You just refuse to give Dubas credit for anything, and so just arbitrarily claim that he must be cheating.Honestly, tell me you believe the cap just magically works out year after year
Would you do me the same solid in return and explain the implications of Keefe's attached post-game comment after the Caps game?
Do you think Kase isn't playing because he's not healthy enough? Or, is the reason he can't play is we don't have the cap space? I'll bet you think his injury will magically be timed up to end when the playoffs start. Such great fortune? Earlier in the season, we would move guys around as needed extending injury times as needed to remain cap compliant. It is not natural...it is all manipulated. Again, tell me why Kase isn't playing? He cant. No cap space to activate him. So, we can't use a player who can help us because of the cap. Make no mistake he 100% could play but only can't due to the cap. It's a dance that goes on year after year.
If the Leafs wanted to bring Kase back and the circumstances were set back 30 games, and Bunting had a larger salary to cover Kase's cap number, Bunting would be shelved to use space to get Kase back and Bunting's injury would be extended out until they could repeat the process. Ain't nobody to do that for poor Kase right now. So Bunting will stay on the cap. All manipulation. All of it. Leafs are harmed often by this manipulation but many see it as just bad injury luck. No. It is cap manipulation tying hands as in the case of Kase right now.
Yes he gets credit by those of us that are honest and level headed.Now that dubas team has set all the reg season records… does he get credit for that or no?
"Pretended". Wow.Kase has a history of concussions.
You yourself pretended to have a history of concussions before. You should know how it works.
"Pretended". Wow.
Don't worry, he'll magically be over it when the cap goes away in May.
Leafs could activate Kase now with zero cap implications.