zeke
The Dube Abides
- Mar 14, 2005
- 66,937
- 36,957
just look for the posters who keep saying the players need to reward Dubas for his faith in them
i keep looking for those posters but can't seem to find them.
just look for the posters who keep saying the players need to reward Dubas for his faith in them
Maybe try looking around without the homer glasses on, and you’d be able to see these examples yourself? Kings, Rangers are both setup for success for the next 12+ years (unlike the Leafs), and haven’t Doobled up multiple first round picks in the process. That’s long term thinking.You couldn't get find a better example of longterm thinking than this team.
he also gave varying term to Rielly/Andy/Kadri/Brown and Hyman , you win some you lose some but that's the way you get players on value deals , the key is to limit your losesHe was a 24 year old Dman that put up 36 points as a rookie, so I can see why there was potential there and to get him locked up but like I said 7 yrs for a 1 yr sample was pretty dumb.
The Marleau contract was one of worst ones all time
FWI
Lou Lam has been named 2 X as Exec of the year [2020 & 2021] since leaving the Leafs in the past 3 years, Hardly someone who his peers believe time has passed him by.
It's been mentioned about 86 times already, that's just an estimate of course but yeah, not sure how anyone could have missed all those posts.how come nobody seems to mention how shit the Islanders are now? guess that isn't convenient.
Yup, Lou was pretty good in Toronto.he also gave varying term to Rielly/Andy/Kadri/Brown and Hyman , you win some you lose some but that's the way you get players on value deals , the key is to limit your loses
Dubies fan club? Weird thing to say.Dubas played no part in the Leafs selecting Marner regardless how desperate Dubies fan club are to give him credit ,
honestly not sure what Lou did here other than have elite ELC talent fall into his lap.
Lou wasn’t there. He wasn’t hired yet.Mitch was clearly a Hunter pick. It doesn't matter what corner Dubas was in, I don't think his opinion carried much weight at that time compared to Lou or Babs. Correct me if I'm wrong but I've heard Babs wanted Noah Hanifin but obviously Hunter's choice won out. Thankfully.
Lou wasn’t there. He wasn’t hired yet.
we weren't discussing which teams had players signed until there late 30's , we were discussing building for future successShifting whatnow?
Leafs have zero contracts extending into any player's late 30s. Unlike every other top team.
This is longterm planning.
Maybe try looking around without the homer glasses on, and you’d be able to see these examples yourself? Kings, Rangers are both setup for success for the next 12+ years (unlike the Leafs), and haven’t Doobled up multiple first round picks in the process. That’s long term thinking.
Crazy stuff.He's only tinkered after signing Tavares? Uh?
Maybe try looking around without the homer glasses on, and you’d be able to see these examples yourself? Kings, Rangers are both setup for success for the next 12+ years (unlike the Leafs), and haven’t Doobled up multiple first round picks in the process. That’s long term thinking.
We can enjoy our current roster without shitting on the previous guys.
Dubas isn't only building for the future. He is also building for the present. Sure Tavares is a longer term deal but he will be around 34-35 when it ends, he still puts up a point per game ( or very close to it) He will likely be fine. Injuries have really slowed Muzzin down he might end badly but the jury is still out on that.we weren't discussing which teams had players signed until there late 30's , we were discussing building for future success
so tell me again how trading 2 x 2nds and a 3rd for 38 year old D and giving out long term deals to players who are going to regress making building for future long term success
Most of us can, it’s not that hard.
strange because there not hard to findi keep looking for those posters but can't seem to find them.
you should tell Zeke that since he's the one who said Dubie only made moves for future long term successDubas isn't only building for the future. He is also building for the present. Sure Tavares is a longer term deal but he will be around 34-35 when it ends, he still puts up a point per game ( or very close to it) He will likely be fine. Injuries have really slowed Muzzin down he might end badly but the jury is still out on that.
it could be worse or it could be much better but the problem is when he signed JT he could only tinker
You anticipate a whack of Rangers playing into their 40's (or very late 30s)?Maybe try looking around without the homer glasses on, and you’d be able to see these examples yourself? Kings, Rangers are both setup for success for the next 12+ years (unlike the Leafs), and haven’t Doobled up multiple first round picks in the process. That’s long term thinking.
Well, a quick google search would help
He acquired a shitload of picks leading up to the 2016 deadline. I mean, getting two 2nds for Nick Spaling and Roman Polak could be considered a huge win. Daniel Winnik for Connor Carrick and a 2nd. Unfortunately Hunter shit the bed with those 2nds.
Moved Phaneuf without retaining. Signed Mo and Kadri to team friendly deals.
We can enjoy our current roster without shitting on the previous guys.
and our core still has remained our coreHis post-Tavares "tinkering":
Andersen ---> Campbell
Hutchinson -> Mrazek
Gardiner ---> Muzzin
Zaitsev -----> Brodie
Hainsey ----> Giordano
Dermott ----> Liljegren
Marincin ----> Holl
Ozhiganov --> Lyubushkin
Rosen -------> Sandin
Hyman ------> Bunting
Kadri ---------> Kerfoot
Kapanen ----> Mikheyev
Brown -------> Engvall
Johnsson -----> Kase
Gauthier ------> Kampf
Marleau ------> Spezza
Ennis ----------> Blackwell
Lindholm -----> Simmonds
Moore --------> Robertson
It takes a real feat of bias and/or ignorance to look at the Leafs' current roster, contracts, and system and convince yourself that it exhibits short-term strategy....when it's clearly set up better for longterm success than any other org in hockey,
Not only is the team elite currently, but unlike the other elite teams it actually is set up to be elite for a long, long time. You couldn't get find a better example of longterm thinking than this team.
The Rangers are set for the next 12yrs?Maybe try looking around without the homer glasses on, and you’d be able to see these examples yourself? Kings, Rangers are both setup for success for the next 12+ years (unlike the Leafs), and haven’t Doobled up multiple first round picks in the process. That’s long term thinking.