Whitesnake
If you rebuild, they will come.
- Jan 5, 2003
- 91,423
- 41,090
That would be amazing...
Who said it's tough?
Something easy doesn't take time.
That would be amazing...
Who said it's tough?
That was amazing seeing Hughes calling him right after the trade!In the special about the draft when Hugues made the trade he called Dach welcoming him and telling him ''we're going to play offense''
Best quote in years from a GM
Enough with the KK excuses already.The kid just turned 22yrs old.. he was bounced around so much while playing with MTL.. give him a couple of seasons to find some chemistry, shake off his poor development and I'd bet that there's a solid player in there. You can't blame him for wanting to take the money and get out of that system that wronged him.
Music to a player’s ears. The opportunity at more offensive stats means more leverage for a better future contract.In the special about the draft when Hugues made the trade he called Dach welcoming him and telling him ''we're going to play offense''
Best quote in years from a GM
Not how it works unfortunately...Evans deal isn't the comparable for Dach.Anything over 1.7M is overpayment.
Evans produced more with less ice time and 0 PP time.
Compare Players - Frozen Tools
Player stat comparison from dobberhockey.comfrozenpool.dobbersports.com
Debatable...there aren't alot of options here, just a matter of time.Something easy doesn't take time.
I agree with your post. I see the second line as weak compared to the others. It's 3 players who were a deception last year. My fear is Dvorak will try to have a chemistry with Gally first. He will rely on him to bring the puck into the zone, so it might create turnovers and Drouin will have a defensive only role because the chemistry won't stick between Dvo and Gally. Drouin is the only fast skater and he is not the kind to take a leading role in a trio. That trio is written 'failed' unless these players combined plays way better than last year. I mean, who will transport the puck from d zone to offensive zone? Uuuhhh, not so sure.Anderson - Suzuki - Caufield
Drouin - Dvorak - Gallagher
Slafkovsky - Dach - Dadonov
Hoffman/Pitlick - Evans - Armia/Pitlick
Pitlick, Hoffman, Armia
In the end, how Drouin can perform (without the puck) will determine the success of this forward group, along with the ability of a so-so D to move the puck.
And the duck soup taste better with the right spices.
To me, but that's just to me, here is the entire conversation that could have taken place...Debatable...there aren't alot of options here, just a matter of time.
Agreed with all of this but sometimes there's just posturing in negotiations...I expect we'll get some news shortly.To me, but that's just to me, here is the entire conversation that could have taken place...
So Kirby...we like you...but it's still needs to be determined when you can to based on stats. So based on this:
Kakko 2y 2.1M
Thomas 2 year 2.8
Lundestrom 2 year 1.8
How about 2 years 2.3? And should I remind you that it's just 500K off a guy that just had 77 points. And yes, I know taxes and all but still...On what basis could he ask for more based on comparables?
You’re correct about posturing. Since it’s a negotiation, I believe it’s not just sometimes, but always. Hughes acknowledged they were working on it in a recent interview so yes, something will get done soon.Agreed with all of this but sometimes there's just posturing in negotiations...I expect we'll get some news shortly.
Short term...there's no point for either side to commit to longer right now.Dach recently quoted as needing to prove himself and establish himself as a professional hockey player. What does that tell you about his next contract?
Enough with the KK excuses already.
The Habs didn’t “wrong him”
Unless of course you mean they were wrong to draft him.
This is a garbage. MB and the coaches screwed KK over. I doubt they gave him any help on developing and they probably held every mistake against him. And MB likely screwed up contract negotiations. The only thing we don't know is if KK was willing to work on his deficiencies. We'll find out this season if Brind'Amour gives him a chance.Enough with the KK excuses already.
The Habs didn’t “wrong him”
Unless of course you mean they were wrong to draft him.
Considering there is 4 years left before each can become an UFA, a 2-year, bridge term is ideal. It should give each enough time to develop and give a solid hint as to his future in the NHL and maintains two years of RFA status to help lower the cap hit on a long term contract at that point.Assuming that no futher moves are made before the season and that Price is LTIRed for the entire year, the Habs would have about 4-5M available to extend Dach beyond similar bridge deal terms (+/- 2.5M AAV).
Dare I say it, enough for… a Kotkaniemi-like contract extension gamble! (Might explain the delay?)
This being said, a 2-3 years bridge deal around 2-3M AAV seems much more likely in Dach’s case.
Maybe there's more Monahan type trades in the works and HuGo need the capspace.
No point to commit longterm? I hope you're joking...Short term...there's no point for either side to commit to longer right now.
“I doubt” “probably” “likely”This is a garbage. MB and the coaches screwed KK over. I doubt they gave him any help on developing and they probably held every mistake against him. And MB likely screwed up contract negotiations. The only thing we don't know is if KK was willing to work on his deficiencies. We'll find out this season if Brind'Amour gives him a chance.
Great. Keep apologizing on behalf of me and all the other uneducated typical Habs fans. All while KK’s on ice play continues to do nothing to prove himself… very inspiring!Such an uneducated "typical Habs fan" response.. the exact type I have to often apologize for. They absolutely wronged him and his development.. but great argument, very inspiring!
It's also on the player to develop himself. You can't polish a turd. He's not playing any better on a much stronger team in Carolina so i guess they failed at developing him too?Such an uneducated "typical Habs fan" response.. the exact type I have to often apologize for. They absolutely wronged him and his development.. but great argument, very inspiring!
I agree with your post. I see the second line as weak compared to the others. It's 3 players who were a deception last year. My fear is Dvorak will try to have a chemistry with Gally first. He will rely on him to bring the puck into the zone, so it might create turnovers and Drouin will have a defensive only role because the chemistry won't stick between Dvo and Gally. Drouin is the only fast skater and he is not the kind to take a leading role in a trio. That trio is written 'failed' unless these players combined plays way better than last year. I mean, who will transport the puck from d zone to offensive zone? Uuuhhh, not so sure.
The duck soup is out of context but yeah, I agree on that too.
Dach recently quoted as needing to prove himself and establish himself as a professional hockey player. What does that tell you about his next contract?
Drouin should play with Monahan IMO.I have Drouin / Dvorak / Gallagher together as well but I wonder about Dvorak and Gallagher skating on the same line. Very curious to see what MSL tinkers with. We will get an indication at the early stages of camp.
Also not sure if Anderson plays with Suzuki/Caufield or does he play with Dach?
Not many considering Gallagher with Dach? Gallagher has become unpopular due to his horrible season last year but he will get a shot to rebound.
I was kinda hoping, Drouin would play with the Preds this year, but that's just me.Drouin should play with Monahan IMO.
Be his lesser version of Goudreau.