"Some Danault type hockey"
Bringing Danault's "type" of hockey is where I thought you were comparing them. I'm not saying Danault's bad, but he olayed an extremely niche type of hockey here so I was genuinely wondering if that's what you saw in Dach.
Little jab at Danault's shot mever hurt though
Nothing to do with his shot
most of his goals came from the dirty area around the net, a space he wasn't allowed to explore in Montreal. Playing PP too with the Kings, which he had not done much in Montreal.
As for Gallagher, I think injuries had much more of an impact than Danault's departure - Gallagher was already an established NHLer when he joined a line with Danault.
it's unfortunate that we lost Danault for nothing, but he did not want to be a Habs anymore.