I’m very bullish on MSL but I’m not sure we can rely on him to fix Dach. Dach is a project in three ways — both to recover from his injuries and to unlearn his bad habits and still to improve his weaknesses.Dach will be the MSL litmus test on developing young players, interesting times to come - MSL could end up being the ultimate game changer for this org.
IIRC, the 11th was San Jose, no?
With 25 goals in 154 games, and a 35% faceoff percentage. On top of lengthy injury history. Dach has a long ways to go to be productive NHLer. This could turn into Johnthan Drouin 2.0
Joel Otto? What's Italian ice cream have to do with hockey?
With 25 goals in 154 games, and a 35% faceoff percentage. On top of lengthy injury history. Dach has a long ways to go to be productive NHLer. This could turn into Johnthan Drouin 2.0
It's pretty strange that Hughes was so upbeat about this acquisition, all things considered.Precisely. Due to his inability or unwillingness to leverage his size and his lack of skill with faceoffs, he doesn't seem to have any future as a center at the very least, even if he does manage to put his game together in some way. If he reaches the level of Drouin in terms of production, absent injuries and truly unfortunate mental health issues, we would be very, very lucky.
Maybe Hughes is Bergevin 2.0?It's pretty strange that Hughes was so upbeat about this acquisition, all things considered.
Don’t say such things. You mustn’t ever say such things.Maybe Hughes is Bergevin 2.0?
It's pretty strange that Hughes was so upbeat about this acquisition, all things considered.
Was he physical in Junior? If he wasn't, he will never be. If he was, there is hope.
Maybe Hughes is Bergevin 2.0?
Was he physical in Junior? If he wasn't, he will never be. If he was, there is hope.
in the end - I take Dach over KK any day of the week. if you look at it from that prospective Hugo totally rectified the idiotic knee jerk reaction and embarrassment last summer with the Canes.I’m very bullish on MSL but I’m not sure we can rely on him to fix Dach. Dach is a project in three ways — both to recover from his injuries and to unlearn his bad habits and still to improve his weaknesses.
Not fair to expect MSL to work miracles.
But it would be fair to criticize HuGo if Dach continues on his trajectory to bust — it was an unnecessary acquisition and at a high price.
You mean one year younger, right? Or, rather, six months younger but Dach was taken in the 2019, rather than 2018, draft.in the end - I take Dach over KK any day of the week. if you look at it from that prospective Hugo totally rectified the idiotic knee jerk reaction and embarrassment last summer with the Canes.
we still have a 3rd OA Centreman (1 year older), with superior skating/strength. I think Dachs wrist injury will never be back to so-called "normal" so he will lose power in his shot, but everything else should and will be fine. Give it some time.. by this time next year if he has proven the naysayers wrong - we win. If he doesn;t show improvement we can always cut bait.. or he becomes a 3C on a friendly contract.
1 year younger, not older no?in the end - I take Dach over KK any day of the week. if you look at it from that prospective Hugo totally rectified the idiotic knee jerk reaction and embarrassment last summer with the Canes.
we still have a 3rd OA Centreman (1 year older), with superior skating/strength. I think Dachs wrist injury will never be back to so-called "normal" so he will lose power in his shot, but everything else should and will be fine. Give it some time.. by this time next year if he has proven the naysayers wrong - we win. If he doesn;t show improvement we can always cut bait.. or he becomes a 3C on a friendly contract.
I mean it’s clear they see this as buying low on a player that has way more potential than is being shown. They think their staff can unlock that potential. I also agree that we traded from a position of strength — we are loaded with D prospects, and weak at forward prospects.It's pretty strange that Hughes was so upbeat about this acquisition, all things considered.
Romanov and a 2nd rounder isn't what Id call "buying low".I mean it’s clear they see this as buying low on a player that has way more potential than is being shown. They think their staff can unlock that potential. I also agree that we traded from a position of strength — we are loaded with D prospects, and weak at forward prospects.
If you think Dach is no more than a 3C, then sure. If you see him as a kid with top 6 upside, then I disagree.Romanov and a 2nd rounder isn't what Id call "buying low".