YP44
Registered User
LOL NMC, have to protect him....
Not sure why, but Cap Friendly released a lits of players who currently would need protection in 21-22 and Doughty was the only king.
LOL NMC, have to protect him....
LOL NMC, have to protect him....
Not sure why, but Cap Friendly released a lits of players who currently would need protection in 21-22 and Doughty was the only king.
LOL NMC, have to protect him....
Some of the names on that NMC list are baffling. Lucic, Frans Nielsen, and Ben Bishop particularly stand out. As much as we complain about the Kings having some bad contracts, there are quite a few questionable ones.
Remarkably, Washington isn't in a bind with any of their star players.
Some of the names on that NMC list are baffling. Lucic, Frans Nielsen, and Ben Bishop particularly stand out. As much as we complain about the Kings having some bad contracts, there are quite a few questionable ones.
Remarkably, Washington isn't in a bind with any of their star players.
NHL GMs are dumb.Some of the names on that NMC list are baffling. Lucic, Frans Nielsen, and Ben Bishop particularly stand out. As much as we complain about the Kings having some bad contracts, there are quite a few questionable ones.
Remarkably, Washington isn't in a bind with any of their star players.
LOL another one who apparently can't understand the difference between NEVER and RARELY....
My god people, it's the English language, it isn't that hard to figure out what words mean.
I will be interesting how many more names are on that list. I imagine GM's have learned and will not hand out NMC for 2021-22Some of the names on that NMC list are baffling. Lucic, Frans Nielsen, and Ben Bishop particularly stand out. As much as we complain about the Kings having some bad contracts, there are quite a few questionable ones.
Remarkably, Washington isn't in a bind with any of their star players.
Indeed.
By the way, you should have a semicolon in that second paragraph, Mr. English.
Ovechkin's contract is up when he is 35 years of age, but he is a generational talent. Backstrom's contract is done when he is age 33. Nothing at all like Kopitar, who is not a generational talent and his deal.That's mainly because they are producing, if Kopitar and company were producing, no one would say LA was in a bind, but Ovechkin, Oshie, and Backstrom all have modified NMC, which if they stop producing, would put them in a bind....
Ovechkin's contract is up when he is 35 years of age, but he is a generational talent. Backstrom's contract is done when he is age 33. Nothing at all like Kopitar, who is not a generational talent and his deal.
Oshie's contract is up when he is 38 years old, and that deal is every bit as bad as Kopitar's deal, which ends when he is 37 years old.
I mean, if we are comparing apples to apples.
Yep, probably, but at least I know the difference between RARELY and NEVER....
Damn, shouldn't of ended my sentence like this.....
Damn....did it again...
Shouldn’t *have*
Sure, if Kopitar was scoring 30+ goals EVERY season, no problem. He isn't doing that though, so it's a mute point.And? LOL I said they are producing....that's why they aren't hindering, if they weren't producing, they would be hindering would they not?
Sure, if Kopitar was scoring 30+ goals EVERY season, no problem. He isn't doing that though, so it's a mute point.
* Moot point. Don't make me take away your French Benefits...Sure, if Kopitar was scoring 30+ goals EVERY season, no problem. He isn't doing that though, so it's a mute point.
Good catch, I was probably thinking he should be silent.* Moot point. Don't make me take away your French Benefits...
NHL GMs are dumb.