BernieParent
In misery of redwings of suckage for a long time
What do you believe are the most important benefits of these connections?i just stated that people cant just lie in a post saying he doesn't have any connections in the game.
What do you believe are the most important benefits of these connections?i just stated that people cant just lie in a post saying he doesn't have any connections in the game.
Information about players, staffers, etc. Who's a complete asshole and pisses off his teammates, which scout is totally BS, what assistant GM is an up and comer and so on. Networking is about information, you give a little, get a little but over a web of connections, you learn a lot of stuff that never makes it to the media, or if it does, well past it's expiration date. The kind of scuttlebutt people share over a couple of drinks at dinner.What do you believe are the most important benefits of these connections?
1 and 2 are easy. Its that third spot that's tricky.If HF Flyers had a triumvirate who would be in it?
Information about players, staffers, etc. Who's a complete asshole and pisses off his teammates, which scout is totally BS, what assistant GM is an up and comer and so on. Networking is about information, you give a little, get a little but over a web of connections, you learn a lot of stuff that never makes it to the media, or if it does, well past it's expiration date. The kind of scuttlebutt people share over a couple of drinks at dinner.
1 and 2 are easy. Its that third spot that's tricky.
He is the media. That's literally what his job was and how he made these connections so...Information about players, staffers, etc. Who's a complete asshole and pisses off his teammates, which scout is totally BS, what assistant GM is an up and comer and so on. Networking is about information, you give a little, get a little but over a web of connections, you learn a lot of stuff that never makes it to the media, or if it does, well past it's expiration date. The kind of scuttlebutt people share over a couple of drinks at dinner.
Thanks, dead. These are the points I was anticipating hearing, and some of them are of value. I was thinking about not just the connections that Jones would have but how he would synthesize the information he is receiving. Is the source reliable? Objective? We tend to seek out confirmation of our own viewpoint so I am skeptical that Jones' conversation would turn up, for example, an up and comer assistant GM with the qualities that are plusses in the modern NHL.Information about players, staffers, etc. Who's a complete asshole and pisses off his teammates, which scout is totally BS, what assistant GM is an up and comer and so on. Networking is about information, you give a little, get a little but over a web of connections, you learn a lot of stuff that never makes it to the media, or if it does, well past it's expiration date. The kind of scuttlebutt people share over a couple of drinks at dinner.
What do you believe are the most important benefits of these connections?
Information about players, staffers, etc. Who's a complete asshole and pisses off his teammates, which scout is totally BS, what assistant GM is an up and comer and so on. Networking is about information, you give a little, get a little but over a web of connections, you learn a lot of stuff that never makes it to the media, or if it does, well past it's expiration date. The kind of scuttlebutt people share over a couple of drinks at dinner.
Ironically, today is Brian Eno's birthday, producer of that song.
Thanks for your reply, Danko. I'm just skeptical that Jones' gathered information will contribute to the best possible decision for the current franchise given his expressed biases. And if one question is how a decision will coalesce with the Philadelphia culture, my skepticism increases.Most people at this level of the league know each other, so there's that to be said, but im assuming the benefit is that he can make an informed decision when Danny comes to him and asks a question...I'm assuming the organization prefers someone who knows the "culture" of philadelphia is important after dealing with Chuck.
The 70s version of the nhl is an entirely different sport compared to what the nhl is now, you're not bullying your way to victory, and we've already proven he said he hates skill, he said it, your new lord and saviorDeslauriers played 9:12 at ES, only one with less time was Laczynski with 9:07 (and he was downright awful, xGF 39.77%)
Bellows 9:20, Brown 10:05, Sedlak 10:39, MacEwen 11:37/Lemieux 12:02 [8 forwards over 12 minutes]
Tots has never said he dislikes skill, just ask St Louis or Atkinson, he dislikes young players getting cute instead of working on fundamentals. And he dislikes skill players who won't play defense, back check or fight for pucks.
Anyone over 60 loves the 70s Flyers, they won two Cups and lost in the Finals twice.
And they weren't offensive ciphers:
1973-74: 5 of 16 teams in goals scored
1974-75: 6 of 18
1975-76: 1 of 18
1976-77: 2 of 18
1977-78: 4 of 18
1978-79: 7 of 17
1979-80: 2 of 21
Nothing has changed b/c season isn't over, I suspect contracts expire July 1 or something like that, and you can't hire replacements until their contracts with other teams expire. And you don't want to get slapped with penalties for tampering.
Same with the AHL group.
Moves on both players and personnel will be made in June and July.
Find me a quote where Torts says he hates skill. He didn't like the "Michigan" - but that's not "skill," that's just a trick playThe 70s version of the nhl is an entirely different sport compared to what the nhl is now, you're not bullying your way to victory, and we've already proven he said he hates skill, he said it, your new lord and savior
So he knows people. How does he differ from Elliott Friedman or any of the other veteran play by play or colour guys? He doesn’t. His only qualification is that he agreed to take the job on condition he kept the Coach and GM.I get it, it isn't the move we wanted, but some are forgetting that he has relationships with nearly everyone. So acting like he is some lowly local radio guy with zero connections in the game is a lie. Not saying this qualifies him at all but just keep that in mind when you are commenting on things.
We know that he frequently interacts with owners/presidents/gms/coaches/players/trainers/media etc...
he has been around the game forever, and has stories with just about everyone.
Find me a quote where Torts says he hates skill. He didn't like the "Michigan" - but that's not "skill," that's just a trick play
This is Briere's team, for good or evil. No different than Sakic or Yzerman when they took over. TItle's are irrelevant, final authority is what matters.So he knows people. How does he differ from Elliott Friedman or any of the other veteran play by play or colour guys? He doesn’t. His only qualification is that he agreed to take the job on condition he kept the Coach and GM.
Find me a quote where Torts says he loves skill and hates grinders.Find me a quote where Torts says he hates skill. He didn't like the "Michigan" - but that's not "skill," that's just a trick play
What's a "grinder." Is Gourde a grinder?Find me a quote where Torts says he loves skill and hates grinders.
What exactly is "skill"?What's a "grinder." Is Gourde a grinder?
Holy f***. They actually think that they’re irrelevant in this city because they’re not talked about on the radio.
God damn the woman who wanted the players on Morning Shows on 6ABC did this b