Player Discussion K'Andre Miller

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
11,499
21,309
Miller has not been great this year, but I think he's really been hampered by Trouba's play. I took a look at the 5v5 advanced stats for our D pairings, and most of the Miller-Trouba pair's stats (CF%, FF%, xGF%) look pretty good. It's the GF% that is abysmal.

So what does that mean? Are they being plagued by the bad puck luck we're seeing this year? I dug a bit deeper and looked at the GA/60, SCA/60, and HDCA/60. The GA/60 for Miller-Trouba was pretty bad, and I also want to note that Trouba is involved in 3 of the 5 worst GA/60 pairings this year (Trouba with Miller, Jones, and Fox). The SCA/60 for Miller-Trouba were not significantly worse than the other pairs, but the HDCA/60 were terrible. Among all pairings for the Rangers this season with at least 10 minutes of 5v5 TOI, Trouba is involved in the 3 worst in terms of HDCA/60 (again, Miller-Trouba, Fox-Trouba, and Jones-Trouba). We are bleeding high danger chances against whenever Trouba is on the ice with anyone. Miller's numbers in these same stats are incredibly good with Fox, and reasonably good with Schneider, albeit with fewer minutes.

What are the options if you break up Miller and Trouba? Either you have to put Lindgren with him in the hopes that he can stabilize Trouba, or you put him with Hajek and try to shelter his minutes (although that would mean Schneider moves up to play tougher minutes). I would like to see Miller and Fox get an extended look together as a shutdown pairing.

Awesome post. Seems like Trouba being compromised with injury and bad puck luck are making Miller look worse than he’s been. He’s clearly not playing his best yet, but I think some are being overly critical.
 

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
13,928
13,684
Long Island
Miller/Trouba had a higher HDCA60 last year than they do this year. And this year they are generating more high danger scoring chances than they are allowing so it's really not an issue. It's what you want when you have a top goalie.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,220
23,700
Special player. Trust him with the puck in the o zone to make something good happen and if not his skating ability to cover it up.
Look at all the plays he's made late in games especially in big games vs divisional opponents.
Can we please sign this guy. At least give me 5-6-7 more years of him.
 

QJL

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
6,325
4,668
14 points in his last 21 games.

Miller is on pace for 38 even strength points. Only 12 D did that last season. Fox had 39.

Kid is going to get paid.

Edit: nvm I missed a PP assist and 2 SH assists.
 

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
34,487
52,358
14 points in his last 21 games.

Miller is on pace for 38 even strength points. Only 12 D did that last season. Fox had 39.

Kid is going to get paid.

Edit: nvm I missed a PP assist and 2 SH assists.
Our 'turnaround' started with him.

The Apprentice became the Master.... and started dragging Trouba around
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,839
13,833
Elmira NY
Trouba and Miller game in and out tend to get the toughest assignments. They are bigger, stronger and more physical than Fox and Lindgren. That Trouba has or had been dealing with some kind of injury wouldn't help. He hasn't had nearly as many highlight reel hits this year.

K'Andre's game is just getting better and better. 22 points in half of a season with hardly any power play time. The Rangers also might want to start looking at him as a shootout option. I think last year when one shootout went a bunch of rounds---he got a chance and he won the game. He's really good on breakaways and in close he places his shots right under the bar. Last night was just another example. Defensively his skating and long reach are handy in all situations. I think an argument could be made that he's our second best player after Fox right now.

As well Schneider has been looking really good too. Gallant has been keeping his ice time to about 15 minutes a game though. He's seriously good. Size, skating, physical play, almost never takes penalties, good offensive instincts.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,220
23,700
Dobson's contract is the primary comparable. 3 years @ 4 mil.
somehow the Islanders get amazing value on their dmen contracts...we instead have to pay Trouba 8 million vs 5-6 million.
Dobson is a terrific young player (even if I think K'Andre is more dynamic and skilled). Why can't we just lock him up for 6-7 years (5-5.5 per?).
I would love to see a homegrown kid given a longer term deal that benefits team and player mutually (ok maybe team a bit more).
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,327
21,248
somehow the Islanders get amazing value on their dmen contracts...we instead have to pay Trouba 8 million vs 5-6 million.
Dobson is a terrific young player (even if I think K'Andre is more dynamic and skilled). Why can't we just lock him up for 6-7 years (5-5.5 per?).
I would love to see a homegrown kid given a longer term deal that benefits team and player mutually (ok maybe team a bit more).
They are completely different situations. Trouba's contract includes 7 UFA years while Dobson's is all RFA years. Trouba was arbitration eligible and Dobson wasn't. Trouba was coming off a very good year. It was pre-covid/flat cap, and Fox wasn't even a Ranger yet.

As far as locking up Miller long term, it's going to depend on several factors. Every year we add, the AAV will go up, and cap space will be tight. And Miller might not want to sign long term. Why sign a 6-7 year deal for 5.5 mil when he can sign a 2-3 year deal @ 4 mil and then sign a much larger contract after? He might prefer to take the guaranteed money rather than trying to maximize his earnings, but that will be up to him. Drury can offer whatever term he wants, but it won't matter if Miller doesn't sign it. At some point, he's just got to get him signed and worry about the next contract when it happens.
 

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
33,220
23,700
They are completely different situations. Trouba's contract includes 7 UFA years while Dobson's is all RFA years. Trouba was arbitration eligible and Dobson wasn't. Trouba was coming off a very good year. It was pre-covid/flat cap, and Fox wasn't even a Ranger yet.

As far as locking up Miller long term, it's going to depend on several factors. Every year we add, the AAV will go up, and cap space will be tight. And Miller might not want to sign long term. Why sign a 6-7 year deal for 5.5 mil when he can sign a 2-3 year deal @ 4 mil and then sign a much larger contract after? He might prefer to take the guaranteed money rather than trying to maximize his earnings, but that will be up to him. Drury can offer whatever term he wants, but it won't matter if Miller doesn't sign it. At some point, he's just got to get him signed and worry about the next contract when it happens.
Not comparing Trouba with Dobson contract rather the rest of their d like Mayfield and Pelech.
I still don't feel Trouba was worth that much money even then (about 2 million overpaid) but I digress.
Totally understand what he may want to take (and none of us know what goes on behind the scenes and K'Andre may want more than 5/5.5 per for a long term deal IDK).
If a 3 year bridge is the only option then fine. Just saying I would like to see him locked up with more term.
 

QJL

Registered User
Jan 2, 2014
6,325
4,668
somehow the Islanders get amazing value on their dmen contracts...we instead have to pay Trouba 8 million vs 5-6 million.
Dobson is a terrific young player (even if I think K'Andre is more dynamic and skilled). Why can't we just lock him up for 6-7 years (5-5.5 per?).
I would love to see a homegrown kid given a longer term deal that benefits team and player mutually (ok maybe team a bit more).

We can definitely lock up Miller at that rate. You just need to accept losing on of Lafreniere, Chytil, or Lindgren to make it work!

He will be bridged to make the money work. It’s unfortunate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLW

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad