lol, ya this style of play has never worked!
Why did you cut off the rest of the sentence? I said nothing but good things, there is no need to spin it into a negative.
If bulldozing to the front of the net wo
rked all the time more teams would be do
ing it all the time.
Why wouldn’t teams focus on driving the puck into the slot? The reason why it doesn’t work all the time is (1) better, stronger defenders than those on the worst team in the league can making it punishing for an attacker attempting this, (2) relentless punishment is a deterrence and even powerful forwards end up picking their opportunities, and (3) you need an outside threat if all your plays funnel into the dense centre
anyway.
Slafkovsky is big and powerful enough to shatter a collapsing defensive shell. He won’t do it every shift, obviously, and driving the puck into the slot won’t work all the time, obviously, but if he can pick his spots and remain a
threat he would open up so much space for his skilled line partners. So you’re threat from the chaos in the slot and you open up space for the perimeter players. It’s a difference maker. This is what we need from a 1OA — a player who makes an outsized impact when he’s on the ice. It remains to be confirmed if Slaf has it in him to make the most of his shifts when the drive to the slot is less effective.
This is in my opinion the best case scenario for Slafkovsky as I know him. Leans on his strengths and avoids his weaknesses. Earlier in his NHL career he was doing the opposite and not surprisingly it was not effective.