Juraj Slafkovsky - Year Two

Where would you prefer Slaf spend his 23-24 season?


  • Total voters
    596
Status
Not open for further replies.

Captain Mountain

Formerly Captain Wolverine
Jun 6, 2010
21,130
15,266
There’s certainly a developing scoresheet problem. Successful pass first forwards that are comparatively not great goalscorers like Getzlaf and Huberdeau shoot 2x more than Slaf. That’s from Day 1 and throughout their careers.

A typical good scoring season for Getzlaf was 20 to 25 goals. Is Slaf going to plateau at 10 to 15 goal/ seasons but help in other aspects of the game? There’s really no comparable that I could find of a successful NHL forward that chose passes over shots at such an extreme level. I’m open minded. Maybe Slaf‘s a whole new bread of extreme playmaking forward? Or maybe someone can find another NHL precedent?

Do you mind providing some support for these claims? Because it doesn't really make much sense. Per most stats from the NHL and looking at D+2 stats, Slaf is off Huberdeau's 5v5 s/60 pace by 1 and is ahead of Huberdeau's PP s/60 pace. Getzlaf actually shot around the same amount 5v5, but he had an active role on the PP

The other obvious example just off the top of my head is Thornton, who almost never shot the puck. But I don't think there's a scoresheet problem, but rather that there's a scoresheet symptom.

I think the biggest problem with Slaf is that he's struggled to adjust to the NHL pace (both in terms of the QoC and smaller ice surface). There have been improvements, but that pace issue is why he doesn't shoot as much and will defer to pass more than he probably should (takes to long to decide if he's going to shoot or not, which means the window is lost and he needs to pass), why his shot selection isn't the best, why he sometimes struggles with keeping his feet moving, etc. There have been improvements though and I'm not sure if its a toolbox issue or an experience one.
 

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,203
5,904
Do you mind providing some support for these claims? Because it doesn't really make much sense. Per most stats from the NHL and looking at D+2 stats, Slaf is off Huberdeau's 5v5 s/60 pace by 1 and is ahead of Huberdeau's PP s/60 pace. Getzlaf actually shot around the same amount 5v5, but he had an active role on the PP

The other obvious example just off the top of my head is Thornton, who almost never shot the puck. But I don't think there's a scoresheet problem, but rather that there's a scoresheet symptom.

I think the biggest problem with Slaf is that he's struggled to adjust to the NHL pace (both in terms of the QoC and smaller ice surface). There have been improvements, but that pace issue is why he doesn't shoot as much and will defer to pass more than he probably should (takes to long to decide if he's going to shoot or not, which means the window is lost and he needs to pass), why his shot selection isn't the best, why he sometimes struggles with keeping his feet moving, etc. There have been improvements though and I'm not sure if its a toolbox issue or an experience one.
To me, he’s adjusted well enough to play in the NHL. He’s improved over last year and over the start of the season. He’s aware of his defensive responsibilities. He looks reasonably good now.

He’s big, fast and can nail a real nice pass. I think there’s the risk this masks his real offensive shortcomings. We all get excited. We turn a blind eye and we wake up in 3 years with a guy that never took off offensively.
 

waitin425

Registered User
Jan 10, 2009
8,124
12,203
Canada
I'm sorry....but anyone who hated on this kid...proclaims him a bust....natters on about how he should be in the AHL. You can start to back track now guys. Please. Just jump on this Slaf train. Doubling down will make you look even more foolish.
 

alasania94

Registered User
Sep 28, 2017
451
454
Been following the last few games and he's been very involved in every shift. Constantly hounding the puck carrier, looking to make plays, shooting more and playing the body.

One of the few players that looks like his head is in the game.

He will be a force in 2-3 years from now.
 
Last edited:

Miller Time

Registered User
Sep 16, 2004
24,187
17,037
He seems like a coachable kid.
Yup.

And with a strong work ethic.

Put those elements together with unique/impressive physical traits, a strong compete level and a personality that can handle (& perhaps thrives off of?) the spotlight... And we've got the ingredients for a pretty incredible player.

I can't wait to see what he looks like when all the work he's been putting in to refine his technical foundations & reads has fully integrated and he's able to just let loose and play... Guy is going to cause havoc all over the ice!
 

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,203
5,904
Type of goal we want Slaf to score. Voronkov (6’4) vs the Bruins on Monday:

starts at 0:00 (first goal)

 

HabbyGuy

Registered User
Apr 10, 2003
7,467
12,577
Hamilton Ontario
Visit site


As pretty as this post is and nice to see him on top of that list. I really don't care about his point totals at all at this point, just keep growing young man, that's what I'm most pleased to see.

He's slowly starting to get this whole north american pro game. Such a coachable kid with a great desire to be better than he was yesterday, the points will just organically follow as he continues to blossom.

If or when he gets there, he can and will positively impact many aspects of a game beyond points.

Post above about his point production while nice and good to see shouldn't be the main focus. It's just superficial glitter at this time in the greater scheme of things imo.

Kid's 19, lots of time and room to grow.
 
Last edited:

Lafleurs Guy

Guuuuuuuy!
Jul 20, 2007
78,302
49,621
As pretty as this post is and nice to see him on top of that list. I really don't care about his point totals at all at this point, just keep growing young man, that's what I'm most pleased to see.

He's slowly starting to get this whole north american pro game. Such a coachable kid with a great desire to be better than he was yesterday, the points will just organically follow as he continues to blossom.

If or when he gets there, he can and will positively impact many aspects of a game beyond points.

Post above about his point production while nice and good to see shouldn't be the main focus. It's just superficial glitter at this time in the greater scheme of things imo.

Kid's 19, lots of time and room to grow.
You are correct but the points are nice. If nothing else it gets a monkey off his back. Points are the first thing we look at when evaluating a player. And honestly, he should have a lot more than he does. It’s nice to see him finally getting rewarded.

I agree with you though, the points should be secondary right now. As long as he’s putting in good shifts then I’m happy.

But - the boy needs to learn to shoot a lot more.
 

HabbyGuy

Registered User
Apr 10, 2003
7,467
12,577
Hamilton Ontario
Visit site
You are correct but the points are nice. If nothing else it gets a monkey off his back. Points are the first thing we look at when evaluating a player. And honestly, he should have a lot more than he does. It’s nice to see him finally getting rewarded.

I agree with you though, the points should be secondary right now. As long as he’s putting in good shifts then I’m happy.

But - the boy needs to learn to shoot a lot more.

Boy needs to learn alot of things, he's young and it going to take some time, but it's very encouraging indeed.

What I like most about him is his desire to get better. So whatever happens it won't be from lack of effort.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad