FLYERSFAN18
Registered User
Not surprising that Carolina does that with Burns since he has been effective as a forward previously in his career. Do they do that with a pair of defenseman that doesn’t include Burns?
The thing that Torts seems to see is that aside from TK, with the open ice in OT, most of his forwards have defensive liabilities that out weigh their offensive potential. A couple of defensemen have as much offensive skill as most of the forwards. As we all know, the roster is challenged when it comes to scoring. So to him 1 forward; 2 defensemen makes sense.There’s also a difference between
a) using two D when you have good D
And
b) using two D when you have an underperforming Sanheim and 5-6 clueless shitters
The thing that Torts seems to see is that aside from TK, with the open ice in OT, most of his forwards have defensive liabilities that out weigh their offensive potential. A couple of defensemen have as much offensive skill as most of the forwards. As we all know, the roster is challenged when it comes to scoring. So to him 1 forward; 2 defensemen makes sense.
Disagree. Frost, Hayes, Tippett, Laughton, JVR, TK. You can make three pairs of competent forwards to roll through a five minute OT with that. Scatter in one of York, Provy, Sanheim, TDA at a time. They'd have more OT wins by default. There's no point worrying about defense in OT. It's designed to encourage scoring. You go in trying to max out defense instead of offense and you'll lose. Like the Flyers do.
And we should all be thanking Torts. Costing them OT points is the only smart things he's done this season.
Good point they could be 0-11 in OT instead of 1-10, can't take that risk.With the slop on this roster playing 2D/1F makes sense in that it increases the possibility of shutting down an opponent’s scoring chances. Aside from one forward being TK, there probably isn’t another forward that Torts could put out on the ice with him that might be able to generate a scoring chance. That guy would probably end up turning it over and creating a scoring chance against.
Clueless
Yea wish the follow up question would of been "so John youve said you don't win by filling up the net, in your opinion do you think a couple goals tonight could of helped the team come away with a win?"The last time they were making plays he complained about it and promised to make it stop.
Shouldn't you be in mourning?It would help if someone actually had the "talent" to skill it up.
It would also help if the coach had the "talent" to help coach the team to score.It would help if someone actually had the "talent" to skill it up.
It would help if someone actually had the "talent" to skill it up.
Couts (at 100%) and TK would be a huge upgrade over Frost and Tippett as your top line.I've got to agree with deadhead.
You can fault Tortorella for a lot of things, but the fact is this club lacks talent.
If you're penciling in Couturier and TK as THE two major facets of your top line.... you're in trouble.
At 5v5... | 2021-2022 | 2022-2023 |
Shot attempts against per 60 | 60.73 | 60.24 |
Expected goals against per 60 | 2.72 | 2.68 |
High Danger Shot Attempts Against per 60 | 11.97 | 12.5 |
Sure does feel like they're rolling over and dying every night they're outplayed. Which has been just about every game.