francis246
Registered User
- Nov 16, 2007
- 15,483
- 19,284
He didn’t bridge the kids, though. And under no circumstances should any team pay $11M to a player on their second line. If they didn’t have a 20 year old franchise centre in Matthews then sure.
Regardless of what you think of Marleau his contract was on the salary forecast. Adding Tavares created the need to move it - they could have kept him and let him play out the final year while still keeping players.
If Kadri was traded for anything other than money Dubas is even dumber than I give him credit for. They need an emotional leader and they haven’t had one since he left. In return they got possibly the most vanilla player in the league who skates fast but doesn’t play fast.
Team was looking to trade Marleau well before the Tavares signing anyways. I think that was always an albatross contract they were looking to move once Dubas took over.
If you do the math you know Kadri would have fit and still could have fit under the current structure. Why do you think so many people were purplexed at the move? It’s been widely reported on, Kadri move had nothing to do with Salary. Had everything to do with they did not want him back after being suspended twice in a row. Dubas’ worst move.
In hindsight the signing was bad. But on the day of the signing it was a fair value contract and I had no problem with it. It’s unfortunate what followed, that has resulted in the contract looking worse but it’s hard to predict that all your RFA’s are going to stick it to you.
you feel the the Tavares signing killed the team, I feel the mishandling of the RFA’s killed the team. Let’s agree to disagree and leave it at that. But I’ve already shown you that the moves outside of maybe Brown and Kapanen had nothing to do with Tavares.