Confirmed with Link: Joel Edmundson (50% retained) to Washington for 3rd and 7th

CHfan1

Registered User
Apr 23, 2012
8,123
9,476
Another 1.75M in cap space for Hughes.

What's he going to do with over 10M in cap space?

I wonder if the Habs will try to stay under the cap without putting Price on LTIR until after the season starts.
 

ML16

Registered User
Aug 28, 2020
455
416
Montreal
by all accounts he fit into the 'atmosphere' Kent wanted here, not to mention size etc. If we are depleting out blueline, this should be another amazing year to watch the smurfs get pounded on for 82 games

Peculiar take, I must say. This trade seems to me like a textbook « addition by substraction » considering that keeping Edmundson would have hindered Guhle’s and Xhekaj’s ice time; both of which are already better (and much more physical) than Steady Eddy post-back injuries.

I wish him the best in Washington, but I much prefer the Habs cut their losses with a 3rd + 7th round picks rather than gamble on Edmundson’s health and a higher return next TDL.
 

Lucky Luke

Registered User
Jun 17, 2006
2,034
889
Which is strange because the Newhook trade should be a far bigger cause for concern. Reinbacher was not my first choice i would have aimed for the fence with Mihckov but Reinbacher was my 2nd choice and let's be honest he pretty much settle our defence for many years to come.

Mailloux-Guhle
Hutson-Reinbacher
Barron-Xhekaj
Harris-Struble

The likelyhood for this to not become a rock solid defence is pretty much nonexistent.

Let me align that up slightly for you...

Guhle-Mailloux
Hutson-Reinbacher
Xhekaj-Barron
Struble-Engstrom

Now, we're good to go.
 

26Mats

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
33,376
25,770
I'd think about it but both Hoffman and Savard have been often injured in the last few years and ideally you want one vet in the lineup at least. I'd probably keep both for the next season at least. But Edmundson had to be traded and i'm happy KH saw that. Return is not great but it is what it is. We needed to make some room.

I had been hoping for 1sts from all of Chiarot, Petry, Edmundson, and Savard.

Hughes did well to get a 1st for Chiarot and even better than a 1st in Matheson for Petry. Savard is a hot commodity now. I would have moved Savard and kept Eddie as a mentor, playing him on the right side. Though not sure we could get a 1st for Savard in this market.
 

Kaiden Ghoul

Youppi va t’il devoir chauser ses patins calvaince
Jan 19, 2020
1,097
842
Good news, more cap space,more minutes for our young guy. Now just get rid of Hoffman and or Armia. We will see if they plan on make the playoff asap or not in the next few days/week/month with our cap space. Just dont overpaid in terms of money and lenght please Hugo if you go fishing
 

MtlSars

Registered User
Dec 9, 2016
693
1,193
Would you move Matheson now if a big offer came along?
Let him play this season and his value will skyrocket.... He had his best season in just 44 games last year. He was on pace for 50+ points.

Let him have a career year and then see if Hutson is ready (don't see him playing in NCAA beyond this year).

He is on a very fair contract currently too. Trade him for a kings ransom then. If Hutson isn't ready, TDL 2026 or keep him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26Mats

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,191
2,679
Oakville, ON
lol he was awful good bye. Give his minutes to Barron and watch our team add 3-4 wins.
agreed- I'm so done with these old hobbling dudes somehow being worth anything, because of locker room nonsense. These guys are pros, multi millionaire athletes.. I'll take Newhook on his experience to win a Cup any day.
it's the coaching staff job to get these guys ready. Unless said Vet is a Crosby, then whatever.
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,220
20,479
Quebec City, Canada
It will be interesting to see what high end offensive talent comes from 31 and 37. The odds are low a player of that caliber is available to begin with and then you have to hit on the right guy. There may be a player who is drafted later that ends up being better but the thing is it's not usually the player people thought it would be. Newhook will fill a need now and hopefully help our young centers progress.
The problem i have with the way some people look at the draft is they look at one position only and that's it. 31st!!! There's never a good player there. So it's impossible to draft a good player there. Hey we traded the 37th overall pick and the other team drafted a bust so we would have drafted a bust to.

It is my opinion that you must look at the draft as a whole not as a bunch of single pick independently. And if you're rebuilding you must look at it even over the span of 2-3 years. The more picks you have in the top 50 or so (where most top players are being drafted) the most chances you have to hit the jackpot just by being lucky.

Let's pretend Beck becomes the next Bergeron. Let's just say we don't have the 26th overall pick acquired from Calgary so we don't pick Mesar and then Mesar is still available when we talk 33rd. Then for sure we do not draft Beck with the 33rd but draft Mesar instead. So even if Mesar bust and Beck becomes a perennial selke then there's no Beck without Mesar if Mesar is still available at 33rd.

The more picks you have the more chances you'll stumble on something. The easier it is for your scouting team to hit for the fence AND go for the safer pick at the same time. It's easier to hit for the fence with dunno the 34th pick if you also got the 40th pick. Yes you later get the problem that you can't sign all of them and give them all a chance and you might let a late bloomer bloom in another team but i'll still always favor more picks if you're rebuilding.

Newhook is 22. Evaluation should be almost be over for him. A skilled pro talent evaluator (which i'm not) should be almost sure to know if he got it or not. So unlike a pick he will need to be good or else that's a bad move. The picks are always good to have no matter what. It gives your scouting team options at the draft.
 

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,191
2,679
Oakville, ON
Habs now have $490,000 in cap space with 23 players signed on the roster without putting Price on LTIR. If they want to make a Monahan deal like last season they could always put Price on LTIR opening up an additional $10.5 million in cap space.

They still have to sign Newhook and make at least one more transaction to be at the 23 player limit.
i'd like to see them go for a Duchene on a 1yr contract with the full intent to move him at the deadline.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaP

ChesterNimitz

governed by the principle of calculated risk
Jul 4, 2002
5,835
12,678
Didn't expect more. Anything above would have been highway robbery. Hugo couldn't trade this guy, he was hurt, slow and past his prime. Other D are pushing. What really bothers me though is giving up a first and second for Newhook or holding on to Eddy while his value was high.
You may experience some relief the first time you see Newhook skate with puck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themilosh

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,220
20,479
Quebec City, Canada
I had been hoping for 1sts from all of Chiarot, Petry, Edmundson, and Savard.

Hughes did well to get a 1st for Chiarot and even better than a 1st in Matheson for Petry. Savard is a hot commodity now. I would have moved Savard and kept Eddie as a mentor, playing him on the right side. Though not sure we could get a 1st for Savard in this market.
Looks like a weak market. A lot of the top teams are fading. Washington, Pens, TB, Bruins. They wont give the moon for vets anymore. The upcoming teams are still finishing their rebuild they wont give the moon either until 2-3 years. It is what it is i guess. MB missed the boat the king ransom we would have got it for Gallagher, Danault and Petry in 2020. Had MB sold in 2020 we would be in a very good situation atm imo. Yeah we miss a cup final but i think it would have been worth it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 26Mats

themilosh

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 27, 2015
3,191
2,679
Oakville, ON
Didn't expect more. Anything above would have been highway robbery. Hugo couldn't trade this guy, he was hurt, slow and past his prime. Other D are pushing. What really bothers me though is giving up a first and second for Newhook or holding on to Eddy while his value was high.
2 x 2nd rounders for a ready (tried and tested) 22 yo, 2019 16th OA highly touted Stanley Cup winner, who has performed at a PPG in the AHL?
sure, enjoy your 2 x 2nd rounders and hope they even come close to Newhook in 4 years.
 

Goldthorpe

Meditating Guru
Jan 22, 2003
5,187
1,147
Montreal
It is my opinion that you must look at the draft as a whole not as a bunch of single pick independently. And if you're rebuilding you must look at it even over the span of 2-3 years. The more picks you have in the top 50 or so (where most top players are being drafted) the most chances you have to hit the jackpot just by being lucky.
The more chances you have to pick nobody of value too.

Your assessment is not wrong, I just believe at this point people are overthinking it. Like you said, it's easier to evaluate and project a 22 years old player. Hughes pulled the trigger on the trade because he prefer the relative certainty of what Newhook has and will (hopefully) brings versus the higher potential (and uncertainty) of Ethan Gauthier and Mikhail Gulyayev.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad