Kents polished head
Formerly Tough Au Lit
- Feb 4, 2013
- 9,717
- 4,743
... in what kind of bizarre contest did Kovalev have the opportunity to score a SHORTHANDED goal?

A 16th-overall pick at the 2011 NHL Draft, Joel Armia re-watches his name get called in Minnesota.
... in what kind of bizarre contest did Kovalev have the opportunity to score a SHORTHANDED goal?![]()
... in what kind of bizarre contest did Kovalev have the opportunity to score a SHORTHANDED goal?![]()
... in what kind of bizarre contest did Kovalev have the opportunity to score a SHORTHANDED goal?![]()
I thought Armia was one of those guys that never really got going during bubble hockey.
In the regular season, he showed some nifty hands in tight areas, and someone who was really tough to knock off the puck. He was also a valuable forchecker and created alot of takeaways.
All I remember from his bubble season is him taking a bunch of frustrating penalties.
Kovalev got PK time, he wasn't bad at it ...
People underestimate how talented players can play PK.
Coaches usually decide not to make them do that and save them for PP and ES situations.
I think there was a time in the mid 90s where the canucks were unleashing Russ Courtnall and Pavel Bure on the PK. How's that for speed?
I have seen it. My only concern is them getting infront of a bomb from the point and breaking something.
58 games. Pace for +20 goals. Most hits. Most takeaways and insane TKA/60 2.82
Valuable forechecker is an understatement. For example Lehkonen's TKA/60 is 1.66. That's almost below average. Downright pathetic compared to Armia.
Josh Anderson fluke-season(18-19)
82gp 27+20
Hits/60 9.19
TKA/60 1.97
Armia 19-20
82gp pace 23+20
Hits/60 8.76
TKA/60 2.82
Nothing to do with bias. His 18-19 season was complete fluke compared to other seasons, especially last one.Gotta love how you couldn't control your bias and just had to add "fluke season" in an attempt to add legitimacy to an unproven claim.
Nothing to do with bias. His 18-19 season was complete fluke compared to other seasons, especially last one.
A 16th-overall pick at the 2011 NHL Draft, Joel Armia re-watches his name get called in Minnesota.
Please.....
It is called progression, he went from 17 goals to 19 goals (pace for 25), and then to 27 goals. This was over the span of his 22,23 and 24 year old seasons.
Your post has everything to do with bias and there is way too much of this nonsense around here.
I thought Armia was one of those guys that never really got going during bubble hockey.
In the regular season, he showed some nifty hands in tight areas, and someone who was really tough to knock off the puck. He was also a valuable forchecker and created alot of takeaways.
All I remember from his bubble season is him taking a bunch of frustrating penalties.
yeah like someone else said, he started to look a lot better as the playoffs went on. I could be wrong but I feel like he's a bit of a slow starter. He was absolutely miserable at the beginning but then it clicked and I thought he looked pretty damn good.
I'd like to see that line stay together at least for a bit. Suzuki is the one guy who can make guys like Drouin and Armia better. They're both skilled underachievers thus far. Worthwhile experiment imo.
He got career best in goals and points while playing 20 less games than his previous best in points.
He is trending up. Hopefully he can continue to do so. Last year he likely would've been a 20/20 guy over a full season. Which is great for what we got him for.
58 games. Pace for +20 goals. Most hits. Most takeaways and insane TKA/60 2.82
Valuable forechecker is an understatement. For example Lehkonen's TKA/60 is 1.66. That's almost below average. Downright pathetic compared to Armia.
Josh Anderson fluke-season(18-19)
82gp 27+20
Hits/60 9.19
TKA/60 1.97
Armia 19-20
82gp pace 23+20
Hits/60 8.76
TKA/60 2.82
Armia sux, lets stop this narrative. He's a bottom 6 forward and thats where he should play.Nice to have both of them on the roster don't you think? What's your narrative? We didn't need Anderson cause we have Armia? Or are you saying Armia should have a equal shot to play top 6 like we are penciling in with Anderson?
I do value Armia's game and I agree with you that he does a lot for us that some Habs fans don't appreciate or understand
Armia sux, lets stop this narrative. He's a bottom 6 forward and thats where he should play.
The Habs and Habs fan have a tendency to overrate serviceable players and then they wonder why all of a sudden expectations aren't met. (Danault, Armia, Moen, Bouillon, Dandenault, etc.)Lets stop the Armia suz narrative