I think this year will be one of the deepest top 20s we rank since 2015 or 2016. Definitely not as top heavy with sure fire talent as those years but I think it definitely will be deeper than anything put out since then.
I am talking about the JETS prospect pool not the draft overall because after all this is the Jets Prospects Info thread.I wouldn't go as far as comparing it to 2015. Pre draft coverage and scouting reports of 2015 said that there were at least 11 players in that draft who would contend for a top 5 spot in a typical draft. There were 5 - 7 players in 2015 who'd have gone #1 in this draft. This was a deep draft in that next talent tier but 2015 was deep in high end talent that this draft lacked.
Winnipeg and NYI are the only 2 teams not having one.No prospect camp this year?
Winnipeg and NYI are the only 2 teams not having one.
No prospects maybe?I wonder what the reason is that the Jets are not having a development camp?![]()
Bowness is still learning Maurice's systems.No prospects maybe?
![]()
think it has more to do with pefetti and lucius both just getting back from being hurt, rashevsky/chibrikov being in russia, a few more prospects going to world jr's and then not having many picks in the previous drafts as wellI wonder if the cost is an issue re: development camp.
I forget who normally runs them but I bet they may be waiting for the WJC, I'm sure rankings will change based on that and it's right around the cornerWe gonna have top prospects polls this summer?
Whut?? Fear of locker-room discord infecting potential rookies, wannabees? Must be very contagious and brutal, huh! Keep them far, far away from the "locker-room"! Sensible eh.Winnipeg and NYI are the only 2 teams not having one.
If it seems too good to be true, it probably is. He says this is an annual thing so how have his Top 50 lists from previous years aged with the passage of time?4 in the top 34 is nice.
About as good as your postsIf it seems too good to be true, it probably is. He says this is an annual thing so how have his Top 50 lists from previous years aged with the passage of time?
I haven't had a chance to read the article. This is just one analysts opinion using their criteria. Idk how much objectivity is used in it.If it seems too good to be true, it probably is. He says this is an annual thing so how have his Top 50 lists from previous years aged with the passage of time?
Heinola, Samberg and Chisholm should be our young Ds for years to come. But you’re right, a true number one D would be nice to draft.Seems like our pool has replenished a bit the last few years. The only issue is they are all forwards. We need a true blue chip defensive prospect.
Heinola, Samberg and Chisholm should be our young Ds for years to come. But you’re right, a true number one D would be nice to draft.