This is how I see it too.Yours is a rare view here that realizes the importance of trying to get Campbell some starts to try to get him rolling. With Skinner we have average goaltending at best and its not getting better. With Campbell we have an unconfident goalie who has been struggling but who has higher end peak play potential. I realize almost the whole board are chanting Skinner starts all day but Skinner is not good enough to get a club on a playoff run. We have to at least try to kickstart Campbell.
Rest for Skinner is important too. His game deflates after multiple starts in a row and playoff series dates are often compressed format with lots of play and also potential for long OT. Skinner has trouble eating huge minutes behind pipes. I don't think he's a goalie we can run with every day.
He is still a work in progress but at this point in time Skinner is a better positional goalie than Campbell.Both our goalies are too low in the crouch rather than having straight back and covering higher. Not sure if this it to compensate for difficulties freezing pucks but it sure makes both goalies look smaller than they are. Both also too backed up in cage rather than challenging on lip of crease. This would appear to be for some reason what is being coached here.
We gotta getSmittySoupy running!
Both our goalies are too low in the crouch rather than having straight back and covering higher. Not sure if this it to compensate for difficulties freezing pucks but it sure makes both goalies look smaller than they are. Both also too backed up in cage rather than challenging on lip of crease. This would appear to be for some reason what is being coached here.
I agree with this. Nice work.@ VGK (B2B) - Skinner
v LAK - Skinner
v ANA - Campbell
@ LAK - Skinner
@ ANA (B2B) - Campbell
@ SJS (Afternoon game) - Campbell
@ COL - Skinner
v SJS - Campbell
Is my guess on how the goalies finish. Half of the games to Campbell to see if they can get him going and also give Skinner some pre-playoff rest in the last 4 games of the year.
Good post.I haven't noticed it as much about Skinner...
But Campbell is faster than he thinks he is. Every cross ice pass he's flailing across, full outstretched leg and body forward, which means he ends up on his stomach every time. Several of those shots end up going back toward the center of the net and through the wide open five.
He needs to add a proper butterfly slide & leg flare back into his repertoire. His sequencing is all wrong:
Controlled is: butterfly slide --> leg flare --> full sprawl only if you know you can't get there any other way
Campbell is: full sprawl --> slow recovery to butterfly.
Even last night there were a couple of times when jammed his lead skate hard into the post in a full sprawl, getting there WAY ahead of the puck. Like I said, the problem with misjudging yourself/the play that way is that you are making more work for yourself... your upper body fades into the ice as you fly across, the top is exposed, the 5-hole is exposed and then you've gotta get back UP into butterfly (imagine the idea of getting UP into butterfly that often, how inefficient!).
A guy like Price would 9.5/10 times push hard into a controlled butterfly (and higher up in the crease, not aiming for the posts) and be ready to jam the breaks on to stay square or flare the lead leg if you are a little late (or trailing leg if a little early). But you can only do that if your push yourself into a controlled butterfly slide (with both knees equally weighted until you need one).
Campbell knows better... he's just up in his head. He thinks he's slow. That's not the problem, he's erratic.
He is still a work in progress but at this point in time Skinner is a better positional goalie than Campbell.
If you watch some of Campbells earlier work (when he was with the Leafs) he almost exclusively relies on reflexes over positioning. I am starting to really question why the team even bothered to target this goalie last summer.
While its obviously important to get the most out of Campbell (he needs starts) unless he makes some drastic changes I dont hold out much hope that he will be a consistently reliable (quality) starting goalie. He doesnt even appear to have the mental toughness required to be a quality starter.
As I posted before this is not how a championship caliber organization crafts their goaltending situation.
Skinner is being asked to do way too much in front of a team that stubbornly believes they can out score their lack of commitment to defence.
I haven't noticed it as much about Skinner...
But Campbell is faster than he thinks he is. Every cross ice pass he's flailing across, full outstretched leg and body forward, which means he ends up on his stomach every time. Several of those shots end up going back toward the center of the net and through the wide open five.
He needs to add a proper butterfly slide & leg flare back into his repertoire. His sequencing is all wrong:
Controlled is: butterfly slide --> leg flare --> full sprawl only if you know you can't get there any other way
Campbell is: full sprawl --> slow recovery to butterfly.
Even last night there were a couple of times when jammed his lead skate hard into the post in a full sprawl, getting there WAY ahead of the puck. Like I said, the problem with misjudging yourself/the play that way is that you are making more work for yourself... your upper body fades into the ice as you fly across, the top is exposed, the 5-hole is exposed and then you've gotta get back UP into butterfly (imagine the idea of getting UP into butterfly that often, how inefficient!).
A guy like Price would 9.5/10 times push hard into a controlled butterfly (and higher up in the crease, not aiming for the posts) and be ready to jam the breaks on to stay square or flare the lead leg if you are a little late (or trailing leg if a little early). But you can only do that if your push yourself into a controlled butterfly slide (with both knees equally weighted until you need one).
Campbell knows better... he's just up in his head. He thinks he's slow. That's not the problem, he's erratic.
That surprises me...I thought they did have an analytics dept. Perhaps they need to add some expertise to properly utilize it.To answer your question on why they signed Campbell- the answer is Dustin Schwartz- a guy who has been an epic failure here- they rely on this guy for everything. They also don’t have an analytics sept.
Secondly- oilers give up the 4th least amount of high danger chances. Defense isn’t the issue- goaltending is. Furthermore, I think Holland did an excellent job with Ekholm, but failed in not securing a partner for Nurse. Nurse’s numbers away from Ceci are significantly better. Ceci has been a train wreck this year. Even Stauffer stated teams are dumping the puck in his corner.
Yours is a rare view here that realizes the importance of trying to get Campbell some starts to try to get him rolling. With Skinner we have average goaltending at best and its not getting better. With Campbell we have an unconfident goalie who has been struggling but who has higher end peak play potential. I realize almost the whole board are chanting Skinner starts all day but Skinner is not good enough to get a club on a playoff run. We have to at least try to kickstart Campbell.
Rest for Skinner is important too. His game deflates after multiple starts in a row and playoff series dates are often compressed format with lots of play and also potential for long OT. Skinner has trouble eating huge minutes behind pipes. I don't think he's a goalie we can run with every day.
I agree with this. Nice work.
He has very quick feet and can move very quickly through his crease. It's actually a strength of his, but as you did a very good job of outlining all his other inability makes this skill moot.
This is how I see it too.
Look what happened when Smith got going thoughWe gotta getSmittySoupy running!
Honestly, I'm not convinced that anyone in the organization was all that in love with Campbell. The way I read the situation, it seems like they focused on the guy they thought they could get, rather than the best option available.To answer your question on why they signed Campbell- the answer is Dustin Schwartz- a guy who has been an epic failure here- they rely on this guy for everything. They also don’t have an analytics sept.
Secondly- oilers give up the 4th least amount of high danger chances. Defense isn’t the issue- goaltending is. Furthermore, I think Holland did an excellent job with Ekholm, but failed in not securing a partner for Nurse. Nurse’s numbers away from Ceci are significantly better. Ceci has been a train wreck this year. Even Stauffer stated teams are dumping the puck in his corner.
Honestly, I'm not convinced that anyone in the organization was all that in love with Campbell. The way I read the situation, it seems like they focused on the guy they thought they could get, rather than the best option available.
I've heard Holland speak about the Campbell signing multiple times, and I don't recall him really mentioning anything they specifically liked about this player. He always says that there were three goalies available this summer with credentials as a starter (presumably Campbell, Husso and Kuemper), and the Oilers weren't sure what they would do if they didn't land one. I'm guessing they were still a bit sore from Markstrom picking Calgary, and were really worried about ending up with no one. Hyman, Barrie and Ceci are friends with Campbell from their Leafs days, and have said they spoke to him multiple times about coming to Edmonton.
My guess is that, through our group of former Maple Leafs, the Oilers knew Campbell wanted to come here, and just decided to pull the trigger rather than risk striking out on a goaltender again.
This provides great insight for those of us have little knowledge of experience with goaltending.I haven't noticed it as much about Skinner...
But Campbell is faster than he thinks he is. Every cross ice pass he's flailing across, full outstretched leg and body forward, which means he ends up on his stomach every time. Several of those shots end up going back toward the center of the net and through the wide open five.
He needs to add a proper butterfly slide & leg flare back into his repertoire. His sequencing is all wrong:
Controlled is: butterfly slide --> leg flare --> full sprawl only if you know you can't get there any other way
Campbell is: full sprawl --> slow recovery to butterfly.
Even last night there were a couple of times when jammed his lead skate hard into the post in a full sprawl, getting there WAY ahead of the puck. Like I said, the problem with misjudging yourself/the play that way is that you are making more work for yourself... your upper body fades into the ice as you fly across, the top is exposed, the 5-hole is exposed and then you've gotta get back UP into butterfly (imagine the idea of getting UP into butterfly that often, how inefficient!).
A guy like Price would 9.5/10 times push hard into a controlled butterfly (and higher up in the crease, not aiming for the posts) and be ready to jam the breaks on to stay square or flare the lead leg if you are a little late (or trailing leg if a little early). But you can only do that if your push yourself into a controlled butterfly slide (with both knees equally weighted until you need one).
Campbell knows better... he's just up in his head. He thinks he's slow. That's not the problem, he's erratic.
I am afraid that we may now know the answer!! UGH. As I have always said. Goalies are voodooAnd even then Jack Campbell is a good example of what concerns me. Which version of such a player would you get. The guy who was looking like a legitimate Vezina candidate or the guy who since January 1 has a .885 sv% and a 3.5 GAA in 23 games.
Goalies are absolutely voodoo. Letting someone like Kane go in hopes that you hit on a goalie seems like a major risk to me.