From an article in The Athletic today;
Grade: F
This is what I wrote back in late November: “So far his transition to Edmonton from Toronto has been nothing short of a disaster.”
No real change four months later.
Stuart Skinner’s excellent rookie NHL season and emergence as the No. 1 obviously takes a lot of the sting out of Campbell’s very disappointing first season in Edmonton (his .882 save percentage in 32 starts is 46th in the NHL) after signing a five-year, $25 million deal in free agency with the Oilers last summer.
Morgan Barron scores on Jack Campbell. (James Carey Lauder / USA Today)
Obviously, it’s easy to criticize Oilers GM Ken Holland in retrospect, but I would argue he basically had two realistic options in free agency: Campbell or Kuemper. And I believe Kuemper had Washington higher on his list than Edmonton.
I don’t think Holland could risk going with a less established guy like Husso. He needed a track-record goalie. So the reasoning and the process that led to the Campbell signing, in my mind, was sound. But the result has not been so far. And the lack of confidence Campbell has in himself at times is noticeable.
I’m personally not ready to write Campbell off. He’s played too many good games in his career. I think a reset this summer will do him well.
But the 2022-23 season is something he needs to totally put behind him. Ugly.
Goals saved above expected: Minus-22, 97th among the 100 goalies ranked.
McLennan: “With Jack, because he plays an emotional game, confidence is a big part of it. He’s a heart-and-soul guy. He’s a good teammate. Everyone is pulling for him. But when he’s off his game, you can read it in his body language — you can read it in his play. I agreed with the process as far as why the Oilers signed him. You understand how the Oilers got there. They needed a veteran, established goalie. I’m still bullish on how it can work out. The Oilers still need him. I still believe he will be valuable to them. But flat out, he’s not performed this year, there’s no getting around it.”