- Jun 14, 2010
- 10,861
- 15,047
Planning a trip to Washington or Tampa?I’ll take a healthy Bruins team over anyone in this division
I’m expecting to be watching games in person and live in mid June
Planning a trip to Washington or Tampa?I’ll take a healthy Bruins team over anyone in this division
I’m expecting to be watching games in person and live in mid June
I’d trust Whitney over a bunch of people on the internet. That said, I thought it was Ference who said he was a bad teammate?
Lol you had them eliminated in round 1 cs Montreal in 2011 I betOr know.
Jesus Christ.Bruins were 10-1-2 healthy
they are easily deepest team in league I’ve seen
12 D? Are you shitting me
Get healthy and rack up
Points vs Buffalo
I actually picked them to go to the cup finals in my bracket, but thanks for coming out.Lol you had them eliminated in round 1 cs Montreal in 2011 I bet
Starting to have my doubts. Wish I had your positivity. Watching the lack of production is very exhaustingLast night I realized with that depth they can win it all
they need full lineup and first line to get their act together for 60 minutes
my point being if he and Bergeron reversed roles would that make Bergy part of a black hole?That line has been an issue for years. Hence black hole. Nothing against Krejci but the issues are there regardless of how many assists he gets
I think that's the Fool's Gold at the moment. Or maybe I'm just too defeated. Will be great to get in the playoffs by winning a bunch of games over a pathetic team but in the end they will still be playing the team's they can't beat now. There early season record had them coming back from deficits in the third. Not a good recipe. Plus with goalie uncertainty I'm not sold that the early part of the year is the team we haveBruins were 10-1-2 healthy
they are easily deepest team in league I’ve seen
12 D? Are you shitting me
Get healthy and rack up
Points vs Buffalo
You would have to go back to my original statement that this isn't all on Krejci. Again:my point being if he and Bergeron reversed roles would that make Bergy part of a black hole?
Only way I trade Studnicka is for an established young center. Right now he's the heir apparent to Krech and there isn't really much after him as far as a 1C or 2C goes.
So far this season the Bruins are:I think that's the Fool's Gold at the moment. Or maybe I'm just too defeated. Will be great to get in the playoffs by winning a bunch of games over a pathetic team but in the end they will still be playing the team's they can't beat now. There early season record had them coming back from deficits in the third. Not a good recipe. Plus with goalie uncertainty I'm not sold that the early part of the year is the team we have
Bruins fans have amnesia when it comes to Sweeney at the deadline - fair or not the second I read this I half laugh and half think what a dummy
last 3 years
2018 Rick Nash
2019 Coyle early February & Johansson at deadline
2020 double digit lead at deadline over Tampa
you guys aren’t bad, Twitter Is a collection of the dumbest Bruins know it all’s
Last night I realized with that depth they can win it all
they need full lineup and first line to get their act together for 60 minutes
Bruins were 10-1-2 healthy
they are easily deepest team in league I’ve seen
12 D? Are you shitting me
Get healthy and rack up
Points vs Buffalo
I think Stud or Vaak could be considered the top prospect, Vaak has shown he is ready and is expansion exempt, that adds value. Steen I could see as the second prospect.I'm guessing Studnicka is on the block since he's been out of the lineup so consistently. If I was betting today, I'd say he's the Bruins' "elite prospect" portion of the potential deal for Ekholm. Divver reported Nashville's assistant GM was at the Providence game yesterday so I think things must be pretty real on that front. I assume they'd be looking at Vaakanainen or Steen as the "third asset" they reportedly want, in addition to the 1st round pick.
I'm torn on whether it's a good idea or not. I like Studnicka a lot but I haven't seen enough offense from him to say he's a surefire top six guy. I'd take what I can get for Vaak at this point, this year has soured me on him big time. I'd have no problem giving him up in the deal. I'd prefer to keep Steen over him at this point. The 1st I think has way less value than in a normal year. I think this draft will be an absolute crap shoot with the number of players not playing and the difficulty scouting in person, so I don't think there will be much of a difference between a mid to late 1st and a 2nd.
Basically the value seems okay to me (I think we overrate our own prospects greatly), I just question if that's the right direction. Ekholm is a stud with a lot of gas left in the tank and I think he would improve the team significantly but are they close enough to the top teams that he puts them in that tier? I don't think so but anything can happen in the playoffs. And you have to wonder about how that affects their strategy at the expansion draft, they're losing a good player there one way or another though.
Will be interesting to see what happens. I definitely think Sweeney is getting some heat from above so he'll try to do something to improve the team now, I'm just not sure he has the prospects to really move the needle for other teams if he's trying to land a big fish. Winnipeg or Montreal could probably beat Sweeney's best offer pretty easily, if they so chose.
He could be a decent add, without giving up assets.Holy shit, this wouldn't surprise me at all... I'm not even kidding.
Pretty soon we will have every fringe- nhl d-man in the league.He could be a decent add, without giving up assets.
I’ll take a healthy Bruins team over anyone in this division
I’m expecting to be watching games in person and live in mid June