Ceremony
How I choose to feel is how I am
- Jun 8, 2012
- 114,576
- 18,074
Things that are decades old have names for a reason. There probably is merit in having awards named after more modern stars but you obviously don't/didn't know anything about several of the people you listed. The point of history is to research it and learn about why things are the way they are rather than say "I don't know who these people are or what they did we should call it something else."How? My justifications are: More impactful people deserve the awards named after them. Legends of the game should be honored rather than league executives.
I'd also have to say I agree with the people saying that if they were renamed, they'd be sold off. Better off leaving it alone than giving the NHL another excuse to throw brands at their already paying audience.