FrostyNomad
Registered User
- Feb 18, 2020
- 6
- 13
The only award name that needs to change is the Norris. It should be named: Art Ross Part 2: This time for Defencemen
I don’t think that really brings forward the point you were trying for. Most people wouldn’t know anything about Campbell and Wales because there’s nothing spotlighting it now.Of the people that are adamantly opposed to name changes, I'm kinda curious how many know that it used to be called the Campell and Wales conferences with the Norris, Smythe, Adams and Patrick divisions.
I'm not saying all the trophies need to change necessarily, but it's not like it hasn't already happened in the league.
Of the people that are adamantly opposed to name changes, I'm kinda curious how many know that it used to be called the Campell and Wales conferences with the Norris, Smythe, Adams and Patrick divisions.
I'm not saying all the trophies need to change necessarily, but it's not like it hasn't already happened in the league.
Winning a bossy sounds kinda rightChange the goal scoring trophy to the Mike Bossy award? Highest GPG average in NHL history.
190 NHL games but also 138 in the NHA the NHL before the NHL existed.????? George Vesina player 19 nhl games
Georges Vezina Stats, Height, Weight, Position, Title | Hockey-Reference.com
Checkout the latest stats of Georges Vezina. Get info about his position, age, height, weight, trade, draft and more on Hockey-Reference.comwww.hockey-reference.com
Many hockey sites have incomplete data on players due to the fact it was not tracked to closely
and sometimes they do no link the stats correctly, While hockeyDB has him at 99 they for whatever reasons do not have 3 of his seasons listed.
Also factor in during Vezina's days teams only played 24 games a year usually
Some people are.This feels like a proposed change that nobody is really asking for.
The traditionalists in this thread.Who really gets worked up about who the trophy is named after?
Yeah, that's kind of the point. We could make the trophies more meaningful if they were namesd after people who had a larger impact on ice.For example, the Norris Trophy simply means most outstanding d-man to me. The name is just a side note
most of these executives who awards are named after fought tooth and nail to try and prevent hockey players making a decent living, let alone a luxury. please read a wikipedia page, let alone a book, before making stupid presumptions "without knowing specifics"Without knowing specifics those executives are the ones who, presumably, made the foundation so that hockey players today can enjoy a life in luxury playing a game for a living just saying.
Very disrespectful to change trophy names etc in general, same goes for tearing down statues and what not. In my opinion that is.
Wouldn't mind if they added a couple of new trophies like most points for dmen, most assists etc.
Also since Norris has essentially become best offensive D man I'd add a trophy for best defensive D
Then the Norris can revert to being the best all-around defenseman (something fans have complained about for decades)
I honestly don't get where this comes from at all.The only award name that needs to change is the Norris. It should be named: Art Ross Part 2: This time for Defencemen
I was going to say this. All players have skeletons in their closetsAnybody you name them after is probably a racist. We're talking about hockey here.
Some people are.
The traditionalists in this thread.
Yeah, that's kind of the point. We could make the trophies more meaningful if they were namesd after people who had a larger impact on ice.
Glad to hear that. So if it doesn't make them any less meaningful, we don't need to stick to these mostlly irrelevant names, when there are far more deserving people!Changing the trophy name doesn't make it any more or less meaningful.
The titles don't change even if the names do.
Glad to hear that. So if it doesn't make them any less meaningful, we don't need to stick to these mostlly irrelevant names, when there are far more deserving people!
We need a James Norris trophy for... why exactly? It's ridiculous. That guy wouldn't even make the top 50 list of people who deserve the trophy named after him.
I believe in the next few years, the NHL should (and I suspect they might eventually) name a committee to review the more important individuals who have contributed to hockey and honor the true heroes of the game rather than deep pocketed suits.
While on the subject, I also agree with others that it is time to add a second defenseman award and maybe a playmaker trophy.
Your math hurts my head.
most of these executives who awards are named after fought tooth and nail to try and prevent hockey players making a decent living, let alone a luxury. please read a wikipedia page, let alone a book, before making stupid presumptions "without knowing specifics"
We definitely dont need that. Do you want the FanDuel award being given to Makar for best dman or the Rogers trophy replacing the Presidents trophyOnly trophy needing changing is the Mark Messier stroking his ego award. We can just all agree to stop doing that and pretend it never happened…..just like Messier does with his Vancouver stint.
They should sell the name of the trophy every year to the highest bidder for a sponsorship. Imagine the prestigious “Arby’s award for guy who scored the most points. He has the meats.”
When you look at the big picture, the Hart, Masterson, and Lindsay should all be named after Lemieux.The names of the awards likely won't change but if they did one of the awards should be named Mario Lemieux .
Hart Trophy - W. Gretzky
Art Ross - G. Howe or M. Lemieux
Conn Smythe - P. Roy ( He's won the award more than any player .)
Selke - B. Gainey ( Maybe ? )
Calder - T. Selanne
Lady Bing - R. Francis ( Always under appreciated )
Norris - B. Orr
Masterson - M. Lemieux ( Maybe ? )
Rocket - M. Richard
Vezina - D. Hasek
Lindsay - T . Lindsay or M. Lemieux
Adams - S. Bowman