Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 83,109
- 62,030
Allen with retention might be ok as in a timeshare situation.
Retention would be great, I guess depends on what the AAV on guys like Campbell and Kuemper would be.
Allen with retention might be ok as in a timeshare situation.
Everything I've read say Edmonton is going to offer 5X5Pretty sure we end up with Campbell just hoping its not a lot of money or term lol
Everything I've read say Edmonton is going to offer 5X5
Why if he's being offered more? It's not like he's going to a crap teamWould he take 3/4x5 or 5x4
Whose that goalie from Columbus that stoned us a few years ago in the playoffs? How has his career gone since? Didn’t they have two very good goalies?
Oh I see.Everything I've read say Edmonton is going to offer 5X5
Allen with retention might be ok as in a timeshare situation.
Everything I've read say Edmonton is going to offer 5X5
I hope not. I don't have faith that he can do that contract good. That's a lot of mental pressure to live up toNot sure why Allen's name has popped but but from listening to Lavoie, Price may never play another game. Said his swollen knee was supposed to take 6 weeks to recover from but that it was still an issue a year later. I can see Allen being dumped cheap if the Habs were to sign another starter.
Then Kyle will offer 5.036x5 with max money up front. No way Soup goes to Edmonton.
If Dubas' back is against the wall, and he doesn't have something up his sleeve for a Blackwood trade or another goalie, I don't think he lets Campbell walk into the hands of Edmonton.Everything I've read say Edmonton is going to offer 5X5
Maybe but I hope not. Too long and too much imoIf Dubas' back is against the wall, and he doesn't have something up his sleeve for a Blackwood trade or another goalie, I don't think he lets Campbell walk into the hands of Edmonton.
You ready and excited for #7?
Not the most ideal situation if the money and term is not friendly, but it’s better than not having a decent goalie.Maybe but I hope not. Too long and too much imo
That said, it could just be Campbell's agent posturing to get more money
And expecting a different outcome?Absolutely excited to see this team run it back.
Agreed.Not the most ideal situation if the money and term is not friendly, but it’s better than not having a decent goalie.
What I’m concerned about is Campbell health. Hopefully with a new goalie coach that introduces better conditioning and helps mitigate it.
Dubas will get something done, but we’ll see in the next coming weeks what that looks like.
And expecting a different outcome?
If the goalie changes everything changes.And expecting a different outcome?
5x5 for Jack isn't ideal but at this point, I'm not sure there are any better options. In fact that may end up being the best option by a good margin.Maybe but I hope not. Too long and too much imo
That said, it could just be Campbell's agent posturing to get more money
Please show me an article or video where someone says that…literally not one article has that I’m willing to betIt is a thing actually. It's essentially when a team wants rid of player and is not expecting much of anything back via trade = Soft Deal!
Lol run what back?! A first round exit…?Absolutely excited to see this team run it back.
It's not a good place to be but dubas has shown the ability to get rid of bad contracts.5x5 for Jack isn't ideal but at this point, I'm not sure there are any better options. In fact that may end up being the best option by a good margin.
Definitely, going into the season with them as a tandem would not be a smart move.Agreed.
Lets see what happens but I would not want to start the season with Woll kallgren and Hutch as our depth in net.
I still like Woll as a prospect but I would rather his toes get wet slowly coming in the league rather than sink or swim