There’s an impact, but the individual has more impact on how much he scores than the league does.
This is why these discussions are always so misguided. This crop of superstars are hitting their stride, surpassing the old guard and the league’s scoring is going up as a result.
The league molds itself to the talent on the ice, it’s not the other way around.
If teams run and gun, it’s because it’s working due to the players ability to execute it. If they clamp down and all play trap hockey, it’s because that’s what’s working due to the talent of the players on the ice.
If this group of stars are scoring more 100+ point seasons and more 50+ or even 60+ goal seasons, it doesn’t need to be normalized against any other baseline. It just means this group of super stars are scoring more than the previous group.
Adjusted stats other major flaw is the idea that the talent base is the same from one era to another. Maybe 2015 just wasn’t a very good year? Maybe the stars just weren’t as good or there wasn’t as many of them.
Maybe Mcdavid is better than Crosby, drai is better than Malkin and that’s why they are scoring so much? And maybe Matthews scores at the same rate as Ovechkin because he’s just as good as Ovechkin.
Crazy idea, I know