No idea, I just know it's a much wider market off season than it is at the deadline.
On pure talent you lose a Marner trade 9/10 times. On value per dollar I’d argue you’re more likely to win a Marner trade.
I agree. I see him as least likely of the big 3 to go just because he seems most likely to want to RE-sign.
This also ignore the countless teams who have held onto their core for too long and never won. The difference between the Leafs and the teams you mentioned (COL, TBL) is that they showed they could win a round before they won 4.
It was reported that those 3 teams and STL were the only teams that were able to re-sign him and not just take him on this year at 3M cap. Which teams can realistically fit Marner at 11M?
Again, all the cores you mentioned had actually won rounds prior to winning a cup. The Leafs are 0/6. It’s a false equivalency.
or marners dad accepts 10 on a long term and nylander 9 . Wouldn't that be nice? As others have pointed out, playing here is a privilege and getting that much money to do something you love in the best place on earth should be fine. Same as matthews. No reason he can't sign for 12 million for eight years and be good with that. All three are gonna make at least fifty million each from endorsements during their time in toronto. At some point you have to do what's right and fair for everyone else including the team and the fans... Do that and win a cup , one cup and your kids kids won't ever need to buy a meal in the city ever again...
glad to see that anyone who does not 100% agree with you is stupid .. when did i say anything about being cranky?
I didn't say you were stupid or foolish. I said voluntarily trading away Matthews or Marner and putting the future of the Leafs on fluking into something would be stupid/foolish, which is a pretty undeniably true statement that I even further expanded on and proved for you. We're one of the best teams in the world, Matthews and Marner are two of the best players in the world, and they are essentially guarantees to provide surplus value on whatever contract they sign for the foreseeable future. You're not getting current value back in a trade that makes up for that, because no other team would dream of trading that caliber of player, which means putting the future of the franchise on lucking out on futures. That is objectively a bad idea.
www.nhl.com
evolving-hockey.com
Great question and an even tougher answer .. for regular season i prefer mitchy .. for playoffs i prefer Willy .. i think da bigger question is which 2/3 of 4 forwards do you keep? Ultimately it could be Mitchy and Matty of top 4 which stay depending on what each wants. JT will move to LW on league min package when his contract runs up (assuming he is still in league) so that will take care of itself unless JT wins a Cup then he will retire
Are you saying league min after this current contract? He surely wouldnt have to go that low
Jarvis and Morrow for Marner. Jesus Christ.
Years of PTSD has created a pseudo death cult among a faction of this fan base.
So strange to already assign blame for a playoff that has yet to occur.
yes .. he will help team on cap .. he has made even bigger amounts from TO real estate then from his earnings .. and he wants to stay where he is in High Park with a young family
I think there is a pretty good chance he is the future captain of the team tbh
