makbeer
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2006
- 1,234
- 1,251
I blame management more than the player. We can't really blame Marner for being who he is. It's like asking a watercolour artist to build a house.
They had to evaluate the player and know what they were getting, and still chose to pay $11m.
Marner has always been this player. He's a winger who plays a soft, outside skill game, takes a lot of risks with the puck, is turnover prone and hasn't really changed his style since he played junior.
You know you're getting a flashy point-producer who is going to put butts in seats during the regular season but is going to struggle to have an impact when teams buckle down defensively and refs throw away whistles.
They had to evaluate the player and know what they were getting, and still chose to pay $11m.
Marner has always been this player. He's a winger who plays a soft, outside skill game, takes a lot of risks with the puck, is turnover prone and hasn't really changed his style since he played junior.
You know you're getting a flashy point-producer who is going to put butts in seats during the regular season but is going to struggle to have an impact when teams buckle down defensively and refs throw away whistles.