Yes and most people feel Karlsson was weak on the defensive part of the game. When you look at the stats, they don't lie. 11% means he isn't/wasn't very good.
First of all I guarantee you can't even explain what that stat means or what it's measuring.
Secondly that stat page you linked says that Karlsson's age was 47 years old in 2015, so it's probably not even reliable.
Thirdly we're discussing Karlsson in his prime. Not Karlsson when he was Makar's age. Is Makar better than Nick Lidstrom when Lidstrom was 23? Yes. Is he better than prime Lidstrom? No.
Karlsson was coming off of a major achilles injury that seriously effected his mobility and speed. This was an adjustment period in his career, and he struggled at both ends of the ice as a result. He started to really improve as a player in the 2nd half of the 2014-15 season. 2016-17 was his most impressive season as a complete player, and it's the same season he dragged Ottawa to the ECF on one leg while playing elite at both ends of the ice. He was only on the ice for 31% of Ottawa's 5v5 GA in the playoffs (only 11 GA) despite playing 28 minutes a night, and leading his team in points. For reference, Makar has been on the ice for 52% of Colorado's 5v5 GA, and he's playing a minute less than Karlsson, with less defensive zone starts.
If you're going to try to engage in the discussion, then do it in a meaningful way instead of consistently getting your facts wrong and making strange claims.
