abo9
Registered User
- Jun 25, 2017
- 9,153
- 7,274
Arguments for prime Karlsson being better is predicated on punishing Makar for being on a better team.
Not at all. Offensively at least, it's pretty easy to show that prime Karlsson > Makar without involving either teams or injuries.
(Others in this thread argue that Makar is better offensively than prime Karlsson, which is what I'm challenging)
EK was a top 5 scorer in the league at his peak. Makar this season he was 19th or 20th in scoring - not even the highest scoring D
Someone brought up the difference between competition in terms of points per game. There again, prime Karlsson beats Makar.
If we're comparing their playoff, well after 3 rounds, Makar is 5th in scoring. Karlsson finished 6th in scoring during the 2017 playoffs, he played 3/4 rounds. Idk where he stood before the finals were played unfortunately.
Clearly, Makar scored more pts. But he ranked around the same spot compred to his peers than Karlsson did.
No need to get the quality of teams involved. EK's actual numbers were slightly lower but that was par for the course at the time of his prime. He separated himself more vs his contemporaries than Makar has done this year