Proposal: Greenway for your center

[Groo]

Not everyone has a completely barren prospect pool like the Sharks. Some teams top prospect+fifth best prospect are much, much better than others.

I trust you'll be as eager to trade Eklund+Bordeleau for a rental in a few months if you're still in the playoff hunt.

How about for an injured Eichel? If that's all there is with him(negatives) then I'd do that. That has DW's finger prints all over it. Still don't see us as serious contenders.

 

[bernmeister]

Getting back to the subject of the thread, Greenway...

do have a better offer than Ryan Strome retained for Greenway + ?

 

[themelkman]

Not everyone has a completely barren prospect pool like the Sharks. Some teams top prospect+fifth best prospect are much, much better than others.

I trust you'll be as eager to trade Eklund+Bordeleau for a rental in a few months if you're still in the playoff hunt.

Of course not, but Boldy and Lambos arent even close to Eklund and Bordeleau. If you said Rossi and Boldy id be inclined to agree thats a ridiculous ask, but that wasnt.

 

[AKL]

Of course not, but Boldy and Lambos arent even close to Eklund and Bordeleau.

Sure they are.

 

[themelkman]

Sure they are.

Alrighty then, call me up when Boldy is a first line PPG producer in the NHL. I like him a lot but hes not at the same tier as Eklund.

My rating would go
Eklund>Rossi>>>Boldy>Bordeleau>>>Lambos

 

[AKL]

Alrighty then, call me up when Boldy is a first line PPG producer in the NHL. I like him a lot but hes not at the same tier as Eklund.

My rating would go
Eklund>Rossi>>>Boldy>Bordeleau>>>Lambos

I'm sorry, is that what you think Eklund is?

I don't give a damn about your rating. You've already demonstrated in this thread your opinions are worthless to anyone that isn't a Sharks fan.

 

[AKL]

Those two secondary assists on the PP and one secondary assist in garbage time against three god awful teams and the -3 in six games really screams top line point per game producer

 

[Sota Popinski]

Alrighty then, call me up when Boldy is a first line PPG producer in the NHL. I like him a lot but hes not at the same tier as Eklund.

My rating would go
Eklund>Rossi>>>Boldy>Bordeleau>>>Lambos

3 points in 6 games isn't a PPG, slappy. And if Evander Kane wasn't such a bonehead, I doubt Eklund is even on the Sharks.

 

[GuerinUp]

imagine making a post about trading greenway, and then spending 3-4 pages arguing hertls value (in a trade proposed not involving greenway) when he was never asked for.

 

[Groo]

imagine making a post about trading greenway, and then spending 3-4 pages arguing hertls value (in a trade proposed not involving greenway) when he was never asked for.

Post #90
great post. The only guy who makes a bit of sense is Monahan. Unlike Schmaltz, he is only signed for the short term, so if his poor play continues he won't hamper the team going forward....maybe a guy like Hertl at the TDL if SJ is out of it

 

[OilersCoffeeArtBeer]

You want Ryan mcleod for Greenway?

 

[keppel146]

You want Ryan mcleod for Greenway?

No thanks.

 

[keppel146]

Not everyone has a completely barren prospect pool like the Sharks. Some teams top prospect+fifth best prospect are much, much better than others.

I trust you'll be as eager to trade Eklund+Bordeleau for a rental in a few months if you're still in the playoff hunt.

I wouldn’t mind Bordeleau

 

[themelkman]

I'm sorry, is that what you think Eklund is?

I don't give a damn about your rating. You've already demonstrated in this thread your opinions are worthless to anyone that isn't a Sharks fan.

Id say the same for you, clearly overrating your own guys. I think Eklund has a chance at it. Does that mean he will be for sure? Of course not but he has the potential to really be a star in the league.

 

[themelkman]

3 points in 6 games isn't a PPG, slappy. And if Evander Kane wasn't such a bonehead, I doubt Eklund is even on the Sharks.

Jesus why does everyone think I meant right now. Of course the 19 year old isnt a PPG first liner, but hes got a real chance at that in the future.

 

[AKL]

Jesus why does everyone think I meant right now. Of course the 19 year old isnt a PPG first liner, but hes got a real chance at that in the future.

Okay, call us up if that happens

 

[themelkman]

Okay, call us up if that happens

Alright see you in a couple years. Best of luck finding that centerman

 

[bernmeister]

Not sure this is a fit given high prices LA wants, but maybe enough 2nd tier asset value to work. Maybe. This is spitballin and not fully reviewed....

3 way:

Rangers send both KAM and Lindgren home to MIN
along with Strome max retained 50%
for Rossi + a 1st + a 2nd

MIN then moves Brodin, goligoski + possibly Greenway to LA
for pivot help

LAK get instead stopgap on Golgo + Brodin is good add LD


as a result of this^
MIN
- while Strome is immediately useful at pivot, he may have to be dealt later if not extended, but at 50% retained rental will certainly fetch a 1st
- Wild add one or more useful pivots even if not highest top level pivots
- rejuventate their LD with 2 young guys on cheap $

LA
gets immediate LD help and thins its pivot surplus without moving highest tier guys

NY
wince at the LD sacrifice but adds young top 10 prospect soon to compete, also immediately make room for Reunanen + Hajek to play, and once showcased they are dealt while promoting Jones and Robertson. Tinordi can lose some rust and get in a few games.
Add a pick
Moving Strome = spot for Krav on the varsity roster, which is beginning of a solution to this problem

thoughts?

 

[Bazeek]

Not sure this is a fit given high prices LA wants, but maybe enough 2nd tier asset value to work. Maybe. This is spitballin and not fully reviewed....

3 way:

Rangers send both KAM and Lindgren home to MIN
along with Strome max retained 50%
for Rossi + a 1st + a 2nd

MIN then moves Brodin, goligoski + possibly Greenway to LA
for pivot help

LAK get instead stopgap on Golgo + Brodin is good add LD


as a result of this^
MIN
- while Strome is immediately useful at pivot, he may have to be dealt later if not extended, but at 50% retained rental will certainly fetch a 1st
- Wild add one or more useful pivots even if not highest top level pivots
- rejuventate their LD with 2 young guys on cheap $

LA
gets immediate LD help and thins its pivot surplus without moving highest tier guys

NY
wince at the LD sacrifice but adds young top 10 prospect soon to compete, also immediately make room for Reunanen + Hajek to play, and once showcased they are dealt while promoting Jones and Robertson. Tinordi can lose some rust and get in a few games.
Add a pick
Moving Strome = spot for Krav on the varsity roster, which is beginning of a solution to this problem

thoughts?

That this is a nuclear option that literally no parties involved would want.

 

[Lays]

Greenway+Rask for Chytil

 

[Jesus comma Brodin]

Yikes

 

[Sota Popinski]

Greenway+Rask for Chytil

Would the Rangers do this?

 

[bernmeister]

That this is a nuclear option that literally no parties involved would want.

thought going young + cheap on LD would be enticing enuf, no?

 

[GuerinUp]

thought going young + cheap on LD would be enticing enuf, no?

brodin has a nmc

 

[Bazeek]

thought going young + cheap on LD would be enticing enuf, no?

Setting aside that Brodin's NMC probably kills this in the cradle, the Wild already have a good stockpile of defensive prospects to feed onto the team over the next few years. In terms of contract, age and ability, Brodin's an ideal player to have while prospects like Addison, Lambos, O'Rourke, Hunt, etc. push toward the NHL and top-4 minutes. Swapping in Miller and Lindgren mostly just derails that for little benefit, especially since the chances of us prying a better center than Rossi away from LA is low to begin with.