You have to wonder what exactly brings people to keep comparing apples and oranges.
Teams usually go into a rebuild because they have a dry prospect pool and aging vets with declining value. We went into the rebuild with :
Erik Karlsson (27 y/o)
Mark Stone (25 y/o)
Matt Duchene (27 y/o)
JG Pageau (25 y/o)
Mike Hoffman (28 y/o)
Ryan Dzingel (25 y/o)
Derrick Brassard (30 y/o)
Cody Ceci (24 y/o)
Thomas Chabot (21 y/o)
Drake Batherson (19 y/o)
Alex Formenton (18 y/o)
Nick Paul (22 y/o)
Colin White (21 y/o)
Not to mention all the promising prospects who didn't pan out (Logan Brown, Chlapik, Wolanin, goalie prospects, etc)
If you can't see the difference with "usual rebuilds", you have no business trying to be in this debate
IF we make the playoffs, that will have taken 7 years, even if we missed just 6 seasons in the end
This semantic masturbation is a prime example of what you guys have been doing. It's a bit ridiculous but nobody is going to complain as you guys are quite entertaining. The length some people are ready to go to defend a complete stranger's work is something else.
You keep ridiculing the fact that Balcers has been brought up to show how terrible our pro scouting is (among a myriad of other examples, that keep getting ignored for some reason!) but let's look at this :
If he can stop getting injured all the time, he'll be back and make valuable contributions to a hockey team.
But even if he is nothing special, he still would have outplayed several of those bad NHL players that Dorion brought up for the 2020-21 season, which is exhibit #33 as to why our pro scouting is terrible
During a rebuild, who the hell waves a 22 y/o prospect who has had success at the AHL and international level over washed up players like Paquette, Anisimov and Galchenyuk? The answer is Pierre Dorion.