Senscore
Let's keep it cold
- Nov 19, 2012
- 21,534
- 17,206
Well I'm sure we can offer him a bus pass and some filled up McDonald's coffee sticker cards.
Chabot
Chychrun
Sanderson
Zub
vs
Rielly
Brodie
Holl
McCabe
C'mon man......
"Building a D core is easy", yet Dubas has failed to do it.My point is that if you give a monkey high picks to draft, and to throw around to acquire unhappy d on tanking teams, and mark stones to trade and the good fortune of picking high enough to get a Sanderson.
You would have a good d-core. There is so much talent in the league, coming in and moving around that building a good d core is not as hard as Dorion has made it look.
The issue is, there were opportunities to still keep quality defenders. DeMelo comes to mind. Instead, Dorion thought Zaitsev was a good gamble. He thought Hamonic was a viable option for the top 4 for a team that needed to push forward. Heck, even the timing of Chychrun was poor. Using the 7th overall for Chychrun would've been more beneficial to us at the start of the season. When it comes to D, Dorion lets good players go and gambles on bad ones.Shackles are off. That's definitely part of it,
But, we were trying to be competitive for maybe 3 seasons?
Year 1, we went to the ECF, the group of Karlsson, Methot, Phaneuf, Ceci, Boro, and Wideman may not have been the best, but it was competitive. That said, Dorion didn't really build it.
Year 2, collapse started, Methot gone had to replace him with a budget piece in Oduya, certainly not an unrestricted addition, Melnyk likely pulling the purse strings. Half way through that season, the train was off the rails and we were no longer looking to be competitive, start of the rebuild.
Year 3, selling off.
Year 4, still selling off
Year 5, Start to try (signed Dadonov)
Year 6, developing internally while dealing with some miscues (Murray and Dadonov)
Year 7, Meaningful games target.
The problem is you need to take into account what the team is trying to accomplish, and base your evaluation on the actual goal they are trying to achieve.
Oh no, we had a terrible D in years we wanted to draft high... sort of party of the game plan there...
"Building a D core is easy", yet Dubas has failed to do it.
"Signing RFAs is easy", yet Dubas has failed to do it.
Yet, people here are still trying to argue that Dubas has failed to do those things, while Dorion has succeded.
Zibby literally produced at a higher rate than Brassard in the playoffs and season.Was he playing with a torn labrum the entire time he was with us? And why are you saying that Brassard was better then? In the NYR series Zibanejad was their best forward easy.
The Zibanejad + 2nd for Brassard is one of the worst trades in NHL history. Analyzed through any angle it horrific.
Are you going to argue thatThe Leafs gave up the 5th least amount of goals of any team in the league last season.
The Sens were around the middle of the pack as a comparison.
What makes you think he failed to build the defense?
Are you going to argue that
Rielly
Brodie
Holl
McCabe
Is better than
Chabot
Chychrun
Sanderson
Zub
We are arguing who is better at building a D core. I presented to you the top 4 defensemen of both teams.What in the strawman?
I mean if Toronto had cap space and high picks they would have been all over ChychrunWe are arguing who is better at building a D core. I presented to you the top 4 defensemen of both teams.
That's not a strawman. You're the one trying to introduce strawmen.
...and why exactly did Toronto not have the cap space?I mean if Toronto had cap space and high picks they would have been all over Chychrun
...and why exactly did Toronto not have the cap space?
Not being able to properly allocate the cap to build a D core is part of building a D core.
By what metric? The one you just made up?Why doesn't everyone just agree that both Dubas and Dorion have been, at the end of the day, bad GMs? They've had different goals, but they've both failed.
By what metric? The one you just made up?
The whole point of a rebuild is to build a good young core of players with a solid salary structure. Dorion has absolutely done that successfully. The results will come.
Last season was the first real season the team made a push, which was obviously hampered by losing the #1C right off the bat and having to rely of 5th and 6th string goalies at the most critical point of the season.
I know you know this is a good core with a fantastic future ahead. You're just trying to get your last shots in while you can. Even if Dorion gets canned this offseason (which quite frankly, I don't care if he does), this is still his team and the team he built.
Well I'm sure we can offer him a bus pass and some filled up McDonald's coffee sticker cards.
Okay, and for how many seasons were the Leafs seriously trying to win a playoff series? (Dubas' entire tenure)By the metrics of:
For Dubas: winning playoff rounds
For Dorion: making the playoffs
I think this is a good core with a promising future ahead, yes. We could have made the playoffs in Norris didn't get hurt.
I think the Leafs were a very good team, with a ton of talent. They could easily be in the ECF if they got a couple of bounces against the Panthers.
But they didn't get the bounces. And we didn't make the playoffs.
Results are what matter.
Okay, and for how many seasons were the Leafs seriously trying to win a playoff series? (Dubas' entire tenure)
And for how many seasons were the Sens seriously trying to make the playoffs? (I would argue one season, the most recent one)
Even if you believe this (which is hilarious), that's still only 3 seasons, compared to 5 seasons Dubas got to try to win a playoff round.Ottawa started trying to make the playoffs as soon they signed Matt Murray to a 4 year $25M contract.
That move just blew up spectacularly and set the team back multiple seasons.
Murray's signing was a definitely a mis-step but it did not set the team back multiple seasons.Ottawa started trying to make the playoffs as soon they signed Matt Murray to a 4 year $25M contract.
That move just blew up spectacularly and set the team back multiple seasons.
Okay, and for how many seasons were the Leafs seriously trying to win a playoff series? (Dubas' entire tenure)
And for how many seasons were the Sens seriously trying to make the playoffs? (I would argue one season, the most recent one)
Murray's signing was a definitely a mis-step but it did not set the team back multiple seasons.
Now Kyle Dubas is available. Should we sign him as the new GM? We could and have done worse!