Sypher04
Registered User
- Jan 20, 2011
- 12,747
- 11,581
Lol ok
Nothing lol worthy about it. We’re not paying a 1st to get rid of a guy who can be bought out for a pretty small amount
Lol ok
Murray has a 10 team NTC so he has some say in where he goes
I wonder if there's something savvy they could work with Arizona or Chicago.Matt Murray is owed a lot of money this year.
Nobody is going to buy a draft pick for $8M. It's not a good business practice and there are very few owners who will fork out that kind of money for a draft pick in the mid to late 20s. Not to mention the team actually has to HAVE CAP SPACE and I don't see a single potential partner out there other than MAYBE Chicago. That's about it.
I am convinced it's LTIR.
It doesn't really fit my narrative! LolTaylor Hall not included?
Keep the pick , buy him out and live with the penalty next year with a larger cap to play with . Unless he can be dealt for something reasonable ( ie 3 rd plus decent prospect or something along those lines ) . Giving up a 1 st when there are other less costly solutions would be madness .To clarify are you saying the leafs should keep their pick and take the 2M penalty or value the cap space and sell out their pick to drop Murray?
I agree with what you say, but, I really don't like Toronto, so I figure they will get out of this without having to pay much because I would love them to have to bleed first round picks. That would be nice, therefore, unlikely. Not a rational thought process, just realistically experiential...With how much Toronto is over every team can take advantage of Toronto.
Nobody will want Murray, they’d want to trade for the quality players so good look with making it worth it for team accepting to take Murray
But Bailey was owed only 3.5M real money and could be bought out to make the real money even smaller.It cost the Islanders a future 2nd rounder to get out of Bailey's deal and Murray makes about the same with the same term. That's probably going to be the cost to get out of his deal as well.
I’m pretty sure he’s owed 8 million this year, leaf’s only option I believe is a buy outWhat's Murray owed in real money if he were bought out by another team?
2.6M salary for 2 yrs?
Isles paid a future 2nd For 3.5M
So a 2nd + 3rd For 5.3M real dollars?
Or let's say Robertson + 2nd or Voit/Hirvonen + 3rd ?
There are other options. It all depends on the cost. Buyout seems to be the most proactive. Waiting for injury seems to be the least.I’m pretty sure he’s owed 8 million this year, leaf’s only option I believe is a buy out
Buyout, first, or one of Minten/Niemela/ and a pick of some sort are the realistic options. No team with the room to take the full 4.7 million cap hit with a 6 million pricetag attached to it is doing that for a 3rd or even a likely late 2nd 4 drafts out.
I would think Arz is out as they play in front of 4600 people and I can not imagine are interested in 6 million to buy a pick...even a late 1st until there is clarity on an arena that resolves their current revenue shortcomings. That leaves, Anaheim, Chicago, Seattle, Detroit, & maybe Nashville as teams with the capspace to absorb 4.7. Problem is those teams are all fairly set with goaltenders so unlike where Mrazek actually filled a roster hole, Murray addition creates gluts that then would need resolving. MUrray also has a NMC that probably eliminates half those options.
Buyout is the most likely option. The only reason it might not end is a buyout is that it is really strange it would not have occurred in the first window if that was the actual plan.
Buyout, first, or one of Minten/Niemela/ and a pick of some sort are the realistic options. No team with the room to take the full 4.7 million cap hit with a 6 million pricetag attached to it is doing that for a 3rd or even a likely late 2nd 4 drafts out.
I would think Arz is out as they play in front of 4600 people and I can not imagine are interested in 6 million to buy a pick...even a late 1st until there is clarity on an arena that resolves their current revenue shortcomings. That leaves, Anaheim, Chicago, Seattle, Detroit, & maybe Nashville as teams with the capspace to absorb 4.7. Problem is those teams are all fairly set with goaltenders so unlike where Mrazek actually filled a roster hole, Murray addition creates gluts that then would need resolving. MUrray also has a NMC that probably eliminates half those options.
Buyout is the most likely option. The only reason it might not end is a buyout is that it is really strange it would not have occurred in the first window if that was the actual plan.
He will get paid 8M next year. It's a high cost tp pay for only a 2nd.I think it won't take more than a second. Maybe less. I can't see why Anaheim isn't the ones to do it. They need a goalie anyway, and have tons of cap space. heck, they aren't even at the floor yet.
With how much Toronto is over every team can take advantage of Toronto.
Nobody will want Murray, they’d want to trade for the quality players so good look with making it worth it for team accepting to take Murray
Oh that's the pick Davidson traded for a 2024 2nd? I was confused at who Carson Bjarnason was.
Minten/Nemela are not realistic options. A second buyout period is the best time to buy him out if they choose to do so. Murray doesn't have NMC he has a 10 team no trade clause.Buyout, first, or one of Minten/Niemela/ and a pick of some sort are the realistic options. No team with the room to take the full 4.7 million cap hit with a 6 million pricetag attached to it is doing that for a 3rd or even a likely late 2nd 4 drafts out.
I would think Arz is out as they play in front of 4600 people and I can not imagine are interested in 6 million to buy a pick...even a late 1st until there is clarity on an arena that resolves their current revenue shortcomings. That leaves, Anaheim, Chicago, Seattle, Detroit, & maybe Nashville as teams with the capspace to absorb 4.7. Problem is those teams are all fairly set with goaltenders so unlike where Mrazek actually filled a roster hole, Murray addition creates gluts that then would need resolving. MUrray also has a NMC that probably eliminates half those options.
Buyout is the most likely option. The only reason it might not end is a buyout is that it is really strange it would not have occurred in the first window if that was the actual plan.
I mean you don't even have to go that far back to see what happened the last time the Leafs needed to be bailed out of a back contract when they were in a cap crunch....
Close, a third and seventh3rd and a 6th was the cost to dump 2 years.
Can't be higher than that for 1 year. Worst case a buyout solves the problem this year
Second buyout window only comes into play if Samsonov goes to arbitration, which could be the play.Minten/Nemela are not realistic options. A second buyout period is the best time to buy him out if they choose to do so. Murray doesn't have NMC he has a 10 team no trade clause.
yeah but leafs so hf wants knies and if you say a thing else you get the laugh like .. *dx chops hf main boards*3rd and a 6th was the cost to dump 2 years.
Can't be higher than that for 1 year. Worst case a buyout solves the problem this year
See above... Nailed it!!!Buyout, first, or one of Minten/Niemela/ and a pick of some sort are the realistic options. No team with the room to take the full 4.7 million cap hit with a 6 million pricetag attached to it is doing that for a 3rd or even a likely late 2nd 4 drafts out.
I would think Arz is out as they play in front of 4600 people and I can not imagine are interested in 6 million to buy a pick...even a late 1st until there is clarity on an arena that resolves their current revenue shortcomings. That leaves, Anaheim, Chicago, Seattle, Detroit, & maybe Nashville as teams with the capspace to absorb 4.7. Problem is those teams are all fairly set with goaltenders so unlike where Mrazek actually filled a roster hole, Murray addition creates gluts that then would need resolving. MUrray also has a NMC that probably eliminates half those options.
Buyout is the most likely option. The only reason it might not end is a buyout is that it is really strange it would not have occurred in the first window if that was the actual plan.
What’s your prediction if not much.yeah but leafs so hf wants knies and if you say a thing else you get the laugh like .. *dx chops hf main boards*
he will get moved relatively easy and for not much..
See above... Nailed it!!!
ah okay, leave out the context of it... Marleau was a dump to buyout... a little different.I mean you don't even have to go that far back to see what happened the last time the Leafs needed to be bailed out of a back contract when they were in a cap crunch....
View attachment 725732
That 1st rounder turned into Seth Jarvis
Treliving won't bank on LTIR. Not after he was healthy enough to finish the season (in the playoffs). It would be a red flag to the league.Knowing Murray? Getting out of the wrong side of bed should just about do the trick and send him on a 5 month rehab stint