I hope we see Boldy-Rossi-Fiala. No reason to mess with Kirill’s lineWonder if they put Rossi & Boldy with Fiala or give Rossi a look with Kirill
I hope we see Boldy-Rossi-Fiala. No reason to mess with Kirill’s line
They probably feel Foligno has earned better linemates (LOL, bc fiala hasn't). Seriously, though:Early reports are it's Foligno - Rossi- Fiala....
Not sure why they would break up what Rossi/Boldy have built in the AHL.
My excitement about the call ups is tempered by the fact that not only have they split up Rossi and Boldy, who are the only players that have mutual chemistry going into their first game, but that Boldy, the player that, IMO, is going to stay up for good, is playing on a checking line, rather than Fiala.They probably feel Foligno has earned better linemates (LOL, bc fiala hasn't). Seriously, though:
Kaprizov-Hartman-Zucc
GREEF
Fiala-Rossi-Boldy
I think the lines are fluid enough that Boldy will be tried in a few different spots this seaosnMy excitement about the call ups is tempered by the fact that not only have they split up Rossi and Boldy, who are the only players that have mutual chemistry going into their first game, but that Boldy, the player that, IMO, is going to stay up for good, is playing on a checking line, rather than Fiala.
I love Foligno's game, but he is a dump and chaser, just like Duhaime, and Sturm. Boldy and Rossi (and fiala) are puck possession guys, Like Kaprizov and Zuccarello. Putting Boldy on a D & C line is misusing his talents.
The only justification I can see is that Evason wants to protect Rossi from abuse, which is a legit strategy. Rossi was getting abused even down in the AHL.
Hope so, Judd. You see all, know all.I think the lines are fluid enough that Boldy will be tried in a few different spots this seaosn
My initial thought was Foligno is there to protect Rossi from getting abused. If he does well in Boston I could see the lines adjusting properlyMy excitement about the call ups is tempered by the fact that not only have they split up Rossi and Boldy, who are the only players that have mutual chemistry going into their first game, but that Boldy, the player that, IMO, is going to stay up for good, is playing on a checking line, rather than Fiala.
I love Foligno's game, but he is a dump and chaser, just like Duhaime, and Sturm. Boldy and Rossi (and fiala) are puck possession guys, Like Kaprizov and Zuccarello. Putting Boldy on a D & C line is misusing his talents.
The only justification I can see is that Evason wants to protect Rossi from abuse, which is a legit strategy. Rossi was getting abused even down in the AHL.
I am wondering why so many like Rossi and Boldy together on a line? Boldy has, I believe 3 even strength points in 10 AHL games? Talented players with pp points but 5 on 5 easily split up. Good luck to them in their debut.
Boldy is Playing with Rossi on a line at the AHL level and has 3 even strength points in 10 games, was my point.
They probably feel Foligno has earned better linemates (LOL, bc fiala hasn't). Seriously, though:
Kaprizov-Hartman-Zucc
GREEF
Fiala-Rossi-Boldy
Have you watched all of the Iowa games?
Here's where I'm getting at. They've only played 7 games together (Boldy with two injures, and Rossi was out on the December 2nd, 4th and 5th games that Boldy played), and in those 7 games, Boldy had his 3 ESP, 9 in total (as well as a play that he didn't get a point on, but a beautiful pass that led to a Rossi penalty shot where he scored), Rossi had 9 points, and they've been incredible together.
The other thing is that last season Boldy had 13 ESP in 14 games, so the 3 in 10 this year doesn't really mean he's not a good even strength player.
The reason that the people that have been watching Iowa this season don't want to see them split up is because despite the statistics, they've been very good together when they have been together, and there are both a wing and center spot open on Fiala's line that they would fit into perfectly, together, while being a better fit than Foligno. Adjusting to the NHL is really difficult, but it might be a little easier if the two players that already have chemistry together can play together at that level.
Also throwing Fiala on their wing would exemplify the way the Boldy/Rossi/Beckman line has looked as of late.. the other day in Winnipeg they were generating chances left and right, would get Fiala going. Everyone is saying it would be a matchup nightmare and that Bergeron's line would eat them up but IMO you don't know if you don't try.. give them as much opportunity to feel comfortable and get to their game from the jump, if they become an issue with matchup then swap Moose and Boldy. Really putting those 3 on a line together could really open up more opportunities for Kaps line. I hope they get to it.
Yeah that is what my argument was about it too. But they seem to also think that Boldy and Rossi are liabilities on the other side of the ice, just solely based off of not being in the NHL yet.. which sure I guess there is some merit there as it is a different animal, but these are a different kind of prospect (hopefully) and I just don't get why you don't try Boldy/Rossi/Fiala to start and make adjustments as needed. Feels more like a reward to Moose than an actual attempt to see where best fits may lie. You're now instead asking both Moose and Bolds to play different roles than they are accustomed to which to me draw more issue in those first NHL starts then setting players up to be comfortable.If Bergeron's line is matching up against Fiala and two rookies, you've already won, because that means Kaprizov gets to go to town against Charlie Coyle and Taylor Hall.
if Boldy doesn't play 9 games this season, will he also save 1 year of his ELC like Rossi?
Boldy cannot slide. as long as he is effective he should be staying up the rest of the year with zero contract implications.if Boldy doesn't play 9 games this season, will he also save 1 year of his ELC like Rossi?