Saxon Eric
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2005
- 20,554
- 28,336
Who stood out to you?Going to the PBruins game in Hartford tomorrow. Anything I should keep an eye on?
Who stood out to you?Going to the PBruins game in Hartford tomorrow. Anything I should keep an eye on?
not BN, but for me kuhlman has better hockey IQ. zach has all the physical tools over
him, but kuhlman gives you exactly what the coach wants every shift. wash, rinse, repeat.
i still like zach though and think he'll be a solid bottom 6 winger.
Going to be funny when Zboril 5 years from now is a regular solid NHL defenseman here or somewhere elseFirst win against Hartford and that's 8 straight isn't it. Zboril player of the game imo. But many guys worked for this win. Steen is playing much better and it was nice to see Lauko out there.
I mean he could pull a McQuaid or Boychuck and be a late bloomer but even with his recent play, I’d tap the breaks and get ready for him to be dealt.Going to be funny when Zboril 5 years from now is a regular solid NHL defenseman here or somewhere else
Props for you going to that shithole. Also, thank you for your insight, it is much appreciated.Going to the PBruins game in Hartford tomorrow. Anything I should keep an eye on?
As you said Donnie can pick and identify solid D prospects. Leach and his staff seem to do a much better job coaching and preparing them as well.Going to be funny when Zboril 5 years from now is a regular solid NHL defenseman here or somewhere else
Props for you going to that shithole. Also, thank you for your insight, it is much appreciated.
Props for you going to that shithole. Also, thank you for your insight, it is much appreciated.
not BN, but for me kuhlman has better hockey IQ. zach has all the physical tools over
him, but kuhlman gives you exactly what the coach wants every shift. wash, rinse, repeat.
i still like zach though and think he'll be a solid bottom 6 winger.
Anytime! I’m always happy to talk about prospects to those who are genuinely curious.
Is Senyshyn going to end up on that list of players? Maybe, maybe not. I don’t think he does, but sometimes players just don’t make it.
From the man himself
Nice
lines up with what I my senses tell me about Zboril
Just based on what other's here (And Divver) have said about Zboril lately, I'd pull a "Lauzon" with him and extend him on a two-year, one-way deal in the 700-800k per range, trade Moore in the off-season, and roll with this group of 8 next year.
Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
Gryz - Lauzon
Zboril - Clifton
Just based on what other's here (And Divver) have said about Zboril lately, I'd pull a "Lauzon" with him and extend him on a two-year, one-way deal in the 700-800k per range, trade Moore in the off-season, and roll with this group of 8 next year.
Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
Gryz - Lauzon
Zboril - Clifton
I hope we don't have another year of Chara as the top pairing guy.
Why not? He's been great this year. If he were no longer on the top pairing, that would mean his play had declined, which would not be a good thing.
It’s more then just Divver - there are folks around game noticing he’s playing very wellJust based on what other's here (And Divver) have said about Zboril lately, I'd pull a "Lauzon" with him and extend him on a two-year, one-way deal in the 700-800k per range, trade Moore in the off-season, and roll with this group of 8 next year.
Chara - McAvoy
Krug - Carlo
Gryz - Lauzon
Zboril - Clifton
It’s more then just Divver - there are folks around game noticing he’s playing very well
I hope we don't have another year of Chara as the top pairing guy.
I hope that we don't have another year of Chara, period. Heresy to most, I guess, but it's time to move on and bring in the young blood.
He is lucky to have McAvoy who has the skating and energy to cover from him when the play transitions quickly through the neutral zone. His 12 foot stick has been helpful for him, too. He's been good on the PK for the most part, but I've noticed his clearing attempts have gotten poorer. Probably still one of the best in the league at crease clearing, though. Even down low he has not been agile enough to deal with mobile forwards like he used to. He's 43 (in a few days) and I am not sure why any of this is a surprise.
Aside from all that, because I don't mean to give the impression that I think he stinks- he doesn't- but long-term for the Bruins his retirement is beneficial. He won't play forever, and the longer he commands big minutes for average play, the less chance for our young LD to develop properly. Charlie McAvoy is better with Matt Grizz every time they pair up. He needs to be free not to have to keep one eye on covering for the slow partner. If Chara re-signs, he ought to be a 3rd pair, PK specialist and nothing more.
And yep, I expect to get hammered for this point of view by many, but I own it.