Speculation: Gaudreau seeking $8M annually on new deal with Flames

Status
Not open for further replies.

Beninho*

Registered User
Mar 19, 2016
661
0
I can understand the player's POV, a 7 or 8 year deal is most of his prime years, he's 23 now, that will take him to 30.

It's simply not smart to accept a contract of like $6.7 million and burn many of your best years not getting paid what you're worth.

Main reason why the deal is talking a while, Gaudreaus contract situation is different than most in recent memory. 2 year rookie deal where he obviously exceeded expectations tenfold, now he's 23 with no rights as he know this when he burnt a year of his entry level contract which allowed him to get to free agency quicker. Now he would ideally like a deal which sees him become a FA when he's 28-29 but the flames obviously want him for 7-8.either way he's gonna get another massive contract so if the flames do end up looking cheap by dragging this out I don't care, he's gonna get paid quite fairly over the next 10-15 years so taking a bit of a cut on a contract where he doesn't have any rights is exactly what the flames want him to do because at the end of the day this is a business and there's a cap. Would you want your GM to be any different?
 

Ola

Registered User
Apr 10, 2004
34,602
11,604
Sweden
Like I said right away when these talks started, JGs demand is if anything low/very reasonable.

There is no doubt a tendency among fans to live in the past when it comes to contract sums. Like you know, 9m is the new 7m and so forth. But right now, we have a whole different layer of this since the front-loaded cap-circumventing contracts has been banned. You just cannot look at like Zach Parise's caphit of 7.5m and compare it to JG's next contract. ZP will be making -- way -- over 10m per for a really long part of that contract in reality. I am not saying that you can look at Parise's actual salary only, the circumstances are different, but...

JG is an extremely good hockey player. Can lead any team offensively. 8m per with a 75m cap is 10.6% of a team's cap space. From 05' to 11', the cap was under 60m. When like Philly signed Daniel Briere to a 8 year deal he got 6.5m per in 07', the cap was 50m. In other words, 13% of Philly's cap space. And all decent UFAs signed for those sums during this period, if not more (Drury, Gomez and co).

I think the reactions in this thread would be much more proper if JG asked for 10-11m per, I seriously do.
 
Jan 9, 2007
20,134
2,125
Australia
Like I said right away when these talks started, JGs demand is if anything low/very reasonable.

There is no doubt a tendency among fans to live in the past when it comes to contract sums. Like you know, 9m is the new 7m and so forth. But right now, we have a whole different layer of this since the front-loaded cap-circumventing contracts has been banned. You just cannot look at like Zach Parise's caphit of 7.5m and compare it to JG's next contract. ZP will be making -- way -- over 10m per for a really long part of that contract in reality. I am not saying that you can look at Parise's actual salary only, the circumstances are different, but...

JG is an extremely good hockey player. Can lead any team offensively. 8m per with a 75m cap is 10.6% of a team's cap space. From 05' to 11', the cap was under 60m. When like Philly signed Daniel Briere to a 8 year deal he got 6.5m per in 07', the cap was 50m. In other words, 13% of Philly's cap space. And all decent UFAs signed for those sums during this period, if not more (Drury, Gomez and co).

I think the reactions in this thread would be much more proper if JG asked for 10-11m per, I seriously do.

I agree.

8M per seems fair to me. I will be surprised if he signs a long contract for anything under 7.5M.
 

Ducksgo*

Guest
Main reason why the deal is talking a while, Gaudreaus contract situation is different than most in recent memory. 2 year rookie deal where he obviously exceeded expectations tenfold, now he's 23 with no rights as he know this when he burnt a year of his entry level contract which allowed him to get to free agency quicker. Now he would ideally like a deal which sees him become a FA when he's 28-29 but the flames obviously want him for 7-8.either way he's gonna get another massive contract so if the flames do end up looking cheap by dragging this out I don't care, he's gonna get paid quite fairly over the next 10-15 years so taking a bit of a cut on a contract where he doesn't have any rights is exactly what the flames want him to do because at the end of the day this is a business and there's a cap. Would you want your GM to be any different?

Seeking 8 million probably what Lindholm expects. Like I previously said do a 1 for 1 swap. Both clubs make out good value for value
 

Johnnybegood13

Registered User
Jul 11, 2003
8,736
996
Seeking 8 million probably what Lindholm expects. Like I previously said do a 1 for 1 swap. Both clubs make out good value for value
Ummm, no!:shakehead Gaudreau is worth far more than Lindholm and especially for the Flames who don't need him.

And if Lindholm expects 8 million off of a 28 point season he and his agent lack brain cells plain and simple.
 

King In The North

Sean Bennett
Jul 9, 2007
12,084
2,542
Winterfell
Nobody really knows how much influence Burke has on hockey ops but his official job title is President of Hockey Operations. If he doesn't have any say in this what the hell are they paying him to do?

This is likely going to be the biggest deal in Flames history. It would go past Burke, past Ken King and all the way up to Murray Edwards.

Or how about Treliving like many of his other counterparts has full authority over his own job? Do you think every President of HO dabbles into the GM role? Why would he even hire Treliving and not just put himself back into that role after Feaster?
 

JFHockey

Registered User
Nov 8, 2014
576
134
Calgary
Because most people realize 19 year old McDavid is better than 23 year old Gaudreau. :nod:

Did you watch the WC? Gaudreau was clearly the best player on NA, he got more points (way more if you include exhibition games) despite the coach having a 9" ***** for McDavid and trying to work him out of his slump for the entire tournament.
 

tempest2i

Jigsaw Falling Into Place
Oct 25, 2009
9,118
91
Cowtown
Did you watch the WC? Gaudreau was clearly the best player on NA, he got more points (way more if you include exhibition games) despite the coach having a 9" ***** for McDavid and trying to work him out of his slump for the entire tournament.

There no need for you to direct your anger from the Gaudreau situation towards Connor McDavid and the Edmonton Oilers.

Worry about your management team putting their big boy pants on and getting this deal done.
 

JFHockey

Registered User
Nov 8, 2014
576
134
Calgary
There no need for you to direct your anger from the Gaudreau situation towards Connor McDavid and the Edmonton Oilers.

Worry about your management team putting their big boy pants on and getting this deal done.

lol, wut? I'm just saying it's a bit ridiculous to say "19 y/o McDavid > 23 y/o Gaudreau" when the exact opposite was recently proven in front of the entire world.
 

tempest2i

Jigsaw Falling Into Place
Oct 25, 2009
9,118
91
Cowtown
lol, wut? I'm just saying it's a bit ridiculous to say "19 y/o McDavid > 23 y/o Gaudreau" when the exact opposite was recently proven in front of the entire world.

You're not fooling anyone with these desperate attempts at distraction.

Gaudreau needs a contract, his performance at the World Cup is not relevant.
 

tmurfin

That’s the joke
May 8, 2010
11,258
1,312
Seeking 8 million probably what Lindholm expects. Like I previously said do a 1 for 1 swap. Both clubs make out good value for value

Na, we'd need an offensive threat coming back. We're set on our top 3 D for awhile.
 

Draw Me a McElephant

Registered User
Mar 9, 2011
997
66
lol, wut? I'm just saying it's a bit ridiculous to say "19 y/o McDavid > 23 y/o Gaudreau" when the exact opposite was recently proven in front of the entire world.

You heard it here guys, more points in a 3 game sample size is enough to conclusively prove that one player is better than another. Gaudreau and McDavid both looked great for team NA. I honestly thought McDavid generated more, but was snakebitten and wasn't able to finish.

Anyway, this isn't a Gaudreau vs McDavid thread. Gaudreau is probably the 3rd best LW in the world right now and $8M sounds about right to me. Marchand and ~$6M, Gaudreau at ~$8M, and Kane at ~$10M seems like an appropriate spread between similar types of players.
 

ffh

Registered User
Jul 16, 2016
8,488
5,253
Did you watch the WC? Gaudreau was clearly the best player on NA, he got more points (way more if you include exhibition games) despite the coach having a 9" ***** for McDavid and trying to work him out of his slump for the entire tournament.

He was the best player for team north america not named mcdavid. I said from day 1 8x8 for johnny hockey. Dont compare him to mcdavid i cant even fathom well mcdavid will be at 23.
 

McOvechking

Registered User
Apr 28, 2009
11,341
2,677
Edmonton, Alberta
Not sure why Gaudreau needs to be compared to McDavid. It's a 23 year old winger versus a 19 year old center.

He's got two very good seasons under his belt. At his age, and considering Calgary's future, a 7 or 8 year deal should be a given. Granted that the current cost for players is almost exactly $1m per 10 points, why wouldn't $7.8M for a 78 point season make sense? Or expect a slight improvement, extrapolate to a full 82 point season, and settle somewhere around $8.5M?

The fact that a deal hasn't gotten done tells me either Calgary doesn't realize how valuable he is, or that Gaudreau wants out. And as an Oilers fan, I really hope it's not the latter. I would love to see the Oilers face and try and defend Gaudreau for the next 8 years. He's a thrill to watch.
 

Beninho*

Registered User
Mar 19, 2016
661
0
Panarin contract:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/hockey/blackhawks/ct-bowman-panarin-contract-20160927-story.html

Better numbers than Gaudreau, rookie of the year, similar in age. Asking 6 million over 6 years

Gaudreau better come out of the clouds soon...no way he's getting close to his ask.

Ya and Gaudreau didn't have Kane to play on a line with smh. You think he gets anywhere near those numbers without Kane and was 2 years older than Gaudreau in his rookie season so nice try bud.
 

Beninho*

Registered User
Mar 19, 2016
661
0
Not sure why Gaudreau needs to be compared to McDavid. It's a 23 year old winger versus a 19 year old center.

He's got two very good seasons under his belt. At his age, and considering Calgary's future, a 7 or 8 year deal should be a given. Granted that the current cost for players is almost exactly $1m per 10 points, why wouldn't $7.8M for a 78 point season make sense? Or expect a slight improvement, extrapolate to a full 82 point season, and settle somewhere around $8.5M?

The fact that a deal hasn't gotten done tells me either Calgary doesn't realize how valuable he is, or that Gaudreau wants out. And as an Oilers fan, I really hope it's not the latter. I would love to see the Oilers face and try and defend Gaudreau for the next 8 years. He's a thrill to watch.

People will compare because they are both on rival teams and also the annoyance by flames and other teams fans that McDavid will sneeze on the bench and TSN will run a one minute analyzation of it. Where as Gaudreau can go out and be a top 6 scorer and get far less respect. It is what it is and it won't change but McDavid will always be given the benefit of the doubt
 

JarvisFunk

Registered User
Apr 1, 2012
2,165
1,560
Saskatoon
Did you watch the WC? Gaudreau was clearly the best player on NA, he got more points (way more if you include exhibition games) despite the coach having a 9" ***** for McDavid and trying to work him out of his slump for the entire tournament.

I'd say judging a players true ability on a pre-season exhibition tournament, with unfamiliar teammates, and rusty from the off-season is pretty asinine. But if that's why you think Gaudreau has the edge, that's why your not a scout.

Gaudreau was the biggest spot picker, on that whole team. Rarely entered the defensive zone, but looked great because everytime the puck was cleared to center ice, he was right there to pick it up for an odd man rush.
 
Last edited:

WetcoastOrca

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jun 3, 2011
40,028
25,767
Vancouver, BC
Don't say anything bad about McDavid or all of Hf boards will come at you, this entire site has a 9 incher for McDavid

Most of us who have followed hockey recognize a budding young superstar when we see one.
I'm not an Oiler's fan by any stretch but I am a hockey fan. McDavid is a very special young player who doesn't come along that often. As a hockey fan (rather than a fan of a particular team) you should enjoy watching him. Even if you may hate watching him play against your team you should still appreciate the skill that he brings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad