Proposal: Gardiner + Marner for Faulk

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

Lepain

Registered User
Jul 15, 2014
72
0
Carolina adds significantly to a proven #1 d-man, in his prime, signed long term on an unreal contract? To get a prospect who hasn't set foot in the NHL yet?

Marner may be one of the best prospects in the world but take the homer glasses off. Marner could very well end up elite but he isn't there yet. Proven >>>>> potential.

All that needs to be said. Just look what return NJ got for Larsson. Can't even imagine what's the value of Faulk with his contract. Potential is great, but GM nowadays want proven value when they trade core players.
 

LV*

Free my bro Leivo
Aug 26, 2012
11,559
10
Toronto
I was one of the biggest Marner supporters before drafting him and it was a great feeling when he got drafted, the kid has an exceptionally high ceiling. I was originally worried ARZ would take Marner and we'd be left with Strome (I wanted Hanifin instead of Stromer).

However, I'd still do this deal. Justin Faulk right now is a #1B-2A dman IMO and he is only 24 years old, we're very high on Zaitsev who is the same age as Faulk and has yet to play a game in the NHL. Faulk fills a big hole, a long term parter for Morgan Rielly. I believe this deal benefits Toronto but it would definitely hurt to give up my boy Marner. I've seen a lot of proposals giving away one of our young guys (Nylander/Marner) but this is the first one that I'm actually down to do if Carolina adds something small.

Maybe I'm just higher on Faulk than my fellow TML fans, but I for sure think he's a stud.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,217
10,072
and his advanced stats are up there with doughty, ekman larsson etc.
"easy minutes" lol. He regularly plays against the other teams 2nd lines, sometimes vs the top line. maybe watch a game next year?

wow he must be as good as them, give him a 8 year max deal if you think he's in that class.
 
Oct 18, 2011
44,217
10,072
here you go, actual data (as opposed to blind T.O fanboyism based on HERO charts)

hes massively sheltered behind Hunwick and Rielly (even tho Hunwick was terrible vs the competition he faced)

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

same thing in 2014-2015:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

same thing in 2013-2014:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

same thing in 2012-2013:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

same thing in 2011-2012:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

There you go!

_______

compared to Faulk last season:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

hes playing elite competition and hes outperforming them with Hainsey (taking sub 50% ozone starts)

_______

in regards to the bolded, you just showed that you dont know anything about advanced stats.. (except looking at pretty HERO charts!)

Hedman's advanced stats last season: (played the toughest competition among TB dmen and he crushed his opposition)

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

Doughty's advanced stats last season: (played the toughest competition among L.A dmen and did VERY well against them)

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

OEL's advanced stats last season: (played 2nd toughest competition among Arizona's dmen, basically still top pairing competition.. but unlike Murphy he absolutely crushed his opposition)

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

So no, his advanced stats are NOWHERE NEAR OEL, Doughty, OEL because he plays extremely soft minutes.. cus you know the competition that NHL player's face is extremely important, right?
Playing vs Crosby isnt the same thing as vs playing 3rd/4th liners.

So yea, brutal proposal for Carolina.
this will be glossed over by the crowd that thinks gardiner is a top pair dman, and have no grasp of what "relative" statistics are.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
here you go, actual data (as opposed to blind T.O fanboyism based on HERO charts)

hes massively sheltered behind Hunwick and Rielly (even tho Hunwick was terrible vs the competition he faced)

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

same thing in 2014-2015:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

same thing in 2013-2014:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

same thing in 2012-2013:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

same thing in 2011-2012:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

There you go!

_______

compared to Faulk last season:

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

hes playing elite competition and hes outperforming them with Hainsey (taking sub 50% ozone starts)

_______

in regards to the bolded, you just showed that you dont know anything about advanced stats.. (except looking at pretty HERO charts!)

Hedman's advanced stats last season: (played the toughest competition among TB dmen and he crushed his opposition)

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

Doughty's advanced stats last season: (played the toughest competition among L.A dmen and did VERY well against them)

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

OEL's advanced stats last season: (played 2nd toughest competition among Arizona's dmen, basically still top pairing competition.. but unlike Murphy he absolutely crushed his opposition)

http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stat...+3+5+4+6+7+8+13+14+29+30+32+33+34+45+46+63+67

So no, his advanced stats are NOWHERE NEAR OEL, Doughty, OEL because he plays extremely soft minutes.. cus you know the competition that NHL player's face is extremely important, right?
Playing vs Crosby isnt the same thing as vs playing 3rd/4th liners.

So yea, brutal proposal for Carolina.

and the proof gardiner plays against only grinders?
How could a guy who finished with the 2nd most minutes on the team not manage to play against any decent competition?
444 Offensive zone starts, 433 defensive zone starts, I guess they must shelter him in that regard too? when he starts 49.4% of the time in the D zone, he is mightly lucky the other team always throws out the 4th liners. lawl

keep reaching. the leaf hate in you is beyond repair. im in shock you wasted what 2 hours to make that post. lawl
marner is gonna be a leaf for a long time. leafs are doing things the right way. sorry, but montreal is gonna be terrible in a couple years. good thing they are going all in now though! those 2nd rd appearances sure look nice!
 
Last edited:

TT1

Registered User
May 31, 2013
23,850
6,364
Montreal
and the proof gardiner plays against only grinders?
How could a guy who finished with the 2nd most minutes on the team not manage to play against any decent competition?
444 Offensive zone starts, 433 defensive zone starts, I guess they must shelter him in that regard too? when he starts 49.4% of the time in the D zone, he is mightly lucky the other team always throws out the 4th liners. lawl

keep reaching. the leaf hate in you is beyond repair. im in shock you wasted what 2 hours to make that post. lawl
marner is gonna be a leaf for a long time. leafs are doing things the right way. sorry, but montreal is gonna be terrible in a couple years. good thing they are going all in now though! those 2nd rd appearances sure look nice!

i mean theres no point in arguing with someone as close minded and delusional as you, think w/e you want. gardiner = oel, doughty, hedman!! :sarcasm:

im the furthest thing from being biased, just stating facts.
 

Atomos2

Registered User
Jun 28, 2012
16,534
2,777
Toronto, Ontario
It's not about quicker. The idea is for them just to be better. And Faulk is 24 so it's not like they're destroying their future.

Why will it make them better?

1) If Morgan Rielly is your second best d-man, you might win a cup. If he's your first best d-man, fat chance.

2) Unlike on random online proposals, GM's don't get offered top tier D-men in reasonable trades more than once every 5 or 10 years. "Waiting to see what you have in Marner" is not so smart in this respect.

3) If Marner is the point-per-game player Leafs fans evidently think he will be, his value might be comparable to Faulk's. Before then, it's not close. I'd guess half the value.


Teach us more :sarcasm:

Are you ****ing kidding me? Morgan Rielly is 22 years old for **** sakes. All of a sudden, he can't win a cup being the best dman because what,he's been one of the better young dman in the league. That's some great logic :sarcasm: You realize he just won a world championship gold medal being the first best dman right?.
 

Wild Hog

Registered User
Sep 23, 2015
65
0
Canada
This is such a ridiculous proposal. I LOVE Faulk and appreciate his abilities, but the value is simply not close.

Marner + Gardiner for Faulk would be similar to Patrick Kane + Hjalmarsson for Letang. Simply doesn't make sense.

Massive overpayment from the Leafs in this proposal.
 

RodTheBawd

Registered User
Oct 16, 2013
5,529
8,604
This is such a ridiculous proposal. I LOVE Faulk and appreciate his abilities, but the value is simply not close.

Marner + Gardiner for Faulk would be similar to Patrick Kane +Hjalmarsson for Letang. Simply doesn't make sense.

Massive overpayment from the Leafs in this proposal.

To reiterate, so we are all clear on what you are saying...
Marner = Patrick Kane
Gardiner = Hjalmarsson
Faulk = Letang

Time to wrap this thread up.
 

Wild Hog

Registered User
Sep 23, 2015
65
0
Canada
To reiterate, so we are all clear on what you are saying...
Marner = Patrick Kane
Gardiner = Hjalmarsson
Faulk = Letang

Time to wrap this thread up.


I'm not saying that at all.

I'm saying it would be similar to a trade of that nature. Not identical.

-Small skilled forward who has potential to put up massive points.
-Top 4 defensemen who could step in to top 2 if necessary.

FOR

-Top paring defenseman
 

TT1

Registered User
May 31, 2013
23,850
6,364
Montreal
I'm not saying that at all.

I'm saying it would be similar to a trade of that nature. Not identical.

-Small skilled forward who has potential to put up massive points.
-Top 4 defensemen who could step in to top 2 if necessary.

FOR

-Top paring defenseman

except, it really wouldnt
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
23,104
16,252
I'm not saying that at all.

I'm saying it would be similar to a trade of that nature. Not identical.

-Small skilled forward who has potential to put up massive points.
-Top 4 defensemen who could step in to top 2 if necessary.

FOR

-Top paring defenseman

A prospect with questionable NHL future is not in any way similar to the best offensive winger in the world.

"Small skilled forward who has potential to put up massive points" only holds true for Kane. Think of something that is accurate for Marner as well, please.
 

hawksrule

Lot of brains but no polish
May 18, 2014
21,069
10,880
I'm not saying that at all.

I'm saying it would be similar to a trade of that nature. Not identical.

-Small skilled forward who has potential to put up massive points.
-Top 4 defensemen who could step in to top 2 if necessary.

FOR

-Top paring defenseman

Kane and Marner are not comps.

Hammer is much better than Gardiner, and it's not remotely close.

This analogy fails miserably.
 

xxreact9

Registered User
Jun 4, 2012
1,486
2
:leafs

Justin Faulk

:canes

Jake Gardiner

Mitch Marner

Leafs get a top pairing defender who can run the powerplay and pair with Rielly at even strength

Hurricanes get a #2 defender with huge upside plus a Top 5 prospect league wide that projects as an elite scorer.

Thoughts?

STOP!!!!!!!!!! Leaf fans please stop drastically overrating Gardiner. He's not a #2 in any way of measuring it. He's not even a bonafide top-4 by any stretch. He's a -38 over the past two seasons while posting well below average possession stats on the worst team in the league. He isn't facing top competition, one of the lowest QoC on Toronto. He has an even worse corsi per quality ratio. He only earned the 4th most time on ice on a team that is screaming for help on the blueline. He would easily be a bottom pairing guy on a lot of teams in this league. Are these not blatantly obvious indications?

Gardiner has fooled so many leaf fans over the years with his skating and sometimes flashy plays. He has equally many inexplicable turnovers. Leaf fans have always been going on and on about Gardiner's "upside" including this post. He is 26 years old now, how much "HUGE" upside does he have left? If he ever becomes more than a 4/5 I'll be legitimately shocked. His hockey IQ will limit him forever especially at the defense position.
 

Paul4587

Registered User
Jan 26, 2006
31,184
13,199
Leafs fans are seriously underselling Faulks value and seriously overselling Marner and Gardiner in this thread.
 

Hunter368

RIP lomiller1, see you in the next life buddy.
Nov 8, 2011
27,311
24,291
#1D (signed long term to a good contract) for a 2nd pairing soft D and a smallish mystery box.

Canes laugh at the deal.

Neutral fan here
 

one77

Registered User
Dec 22, 2013
2,243
45
I'm not trying to oversell Marner here but no way he's going anywhere. Kid has way too much potential and talent.

But to get Faulk the Leafs need to add something very juicy to Gardiner. Think JVR+Gardiner type deal but I know Leafs fans wouldn't be too happy about that.
 

glucker

Registered User
Aug 22, 2008
7,883
1,421
London, ON
A prospect with questionable NHL future is not in any way similar to the best offensive winger in the world.

"Small skilled forward who has potential to put up massive points" only holds true for Kane. Think of something that is accurate for Marner as well, please.

Marner is the new Colton Orr apparently:help:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad