I just dont really buy that they are so much worse than anyone else at developing forwards. We know the roster roadblocks they faced with having higher priced FWDs in place, and if you want to put some blame on coaching (primarily Quinn because it was the entire point of hiring him) Im fine with that too. But like Chytil is pacing for 50 points and a big bump in his 3rd contract at 23, is that a development failure for a 1st rounder in the 20s? We all know Kakko is a very good all around player and has been snakebit on points; is it really crazy to think he cant score 50-60 next year and earn himself a sizeable raise as well? Laf's got problems right now but so did Chytil & Kakko last year.
If the Rangers were hemorrhaging prospects Id buy the narrative more, but seriously, what prospect did the Rangers ruin because they couldnt develop him properly? Andersson? Please. Howden? Maybe, he probably spent way too much time in the NHL when he shouldve been in HFD. Lundkvist isnt a forward but has been a healthy scratch plenty with another organization. Even Kravtsov, everyone's favorite example coming into the year, hasnt looked out of place despite the mess he and the organization dragged each other into.
I think the development narrative comes from the fanbases frustration with the veterans being unable to get it done and overpaid, and the coach wont give unfinished products the biggest roles. And even that I think is normalizing a bit. This was probably not a post for the GDT but i needed to get it off my chest lol
Yes!!
Kakko scoring 60 points sounds as alien right now as Zibanejad scoring 200.
I could buy it with Laf and Chytil but the roadblocks in front of Kakko are gone. He's our most talented RW by leaps and bounds. He still can't hold down the spot.
Every single scout said this guy was 50-60 points out of the box. That was his floor. It's not at all uncommon to see top 10 picks put up numbers like that D+1 and D+2.
I can understand that projects take a little longer, like a Tage Thompson. Kakko was not a project. I can't buy that EVERYONE missed it, every scout and every executive, two years in a row.
His and Lafreniere's performances are demonstratively behind what players of similar pedigree do.
You can have all the faith in the world in the process, you're entitled to your opinion, but you can't tell me that these are normal results that other teams are getting, so of course people are going to raise questions.