Southern Minny
Registered User
- Nov 29, 2021
- 1,160
- 393
Hopefully Reavo gets his 2pts again!The game isn't out of reach
Hopefully Reavo gets his 2pts again!The game isn't out of reach
Best solution is that if the other team gets the puck, offsides is nullified because they had possession. Saves the goals where the offsides isn't related to the goal
Worst solution, as the you get illegal possession resulting in goals again.The best solution is just get rid of it because it does nothing to improve the game. It isn’t entertaining to watch when you have to worry every time your team scores that it could get called back.
Have to get one here
I do think that as soon as you touch the blue line it should be onsides rather than over the blue line.Worst solution, as the you get illegal possession resulting in goals again.
That I would agree as a good changeI do think that as soon as you touch the blue line it should be onsides rather than over the blue line.
Worst solution, as the you get illegal possession resulting in goals again.
Just because others agree with you doesn't mean I have to. It's a hard binary rule, those are the best for review.Who cares? If it isn’t caught live by the person whose literally only major job is meant to catch it, so be it. It’s part of the game.
There are plenty of fans that don’t like the review, even when it benefits their team.
Who cares? If it isn’t caught live by the person whose literally only major job is meant to catch it, so be it. It’s part of the game.
There are plenty of fans that don’t like the review, even when it benefits their team.
Just because others agree with you doesn't mean I have to. It's a hard binary rule, those are the best for review.
But, who cares? It was missed... it doesn't matter that he was already in the slot when the puck reached the line.That one Duchene goal traumatized the league too much for them to ever go back
It's a clear binary rule defined by a line on the playing surface. Those are the best for review to correct. I will always be in favor of reviewing that type of situation.Not saying you need to agree, I just can’t understand why anyone thinks this is preferable over the alternative. It’s not fun to watch.
It's a clear binary rule defined by a line on the playing surface. Those are the best for review to correct. I will always be in favor of reviewing that type of situation.
I thought hyperboles weren't needed?There’s clear rules for lots of elements of the game, being able to review every single one of them would be great for the game!
I thought hyperboles weren't needed?