GDT: G69: Bruins @ Wild 1pm CT, 7pm Sweden, 8pm Lapa (BSN)

[MNNumbers]

Penalties on 2 shifts in a row. Good thing Brodin is coming back soon.

 

[57special]

Merrill a liability

 

[Southern Minny]

Merrill may just wanna stay over there, Dean probably rip him a new one.

 

[TaLoN]

Damn you Merrill

Keep him in the box away from the team please. We don't want him back

 

[Spurgeon]

Possession that was not permitted by the rules of the game that the linesman missed. That's why replay exists, to correct what was missed.

Just like inbounds vs out of bounds in the NFL.

In bounds vs out of bounds makes more sense in football because you’re challenging whether a catch was legal. The direct result of the catch is determined by whether a player was inbounds or out of bounds.

A goal is not scored because a player was 200 ms early on his entry. It just feels like something that should be in the hands of the linesman. To each their own though, it’s just an opinion and I don’t think it’s ever going away.

 

[DigitalBoldy]

There it is.

 

[MNNumbers]

Final will be 5-2 Bruins.

 

[Spurgeon]

This Bally stream is so annoying when it runs into buffering issues.

 

[Nino Noderreiter]

WOW Boldy

Also please remember my previous quote. Boldy listened

 

[Obvious Fabertism]

Boldy buries it! Marjo has been so good.

 

[TaLoN]

In bounds vs out of bounds makes more sense in football because you’re challenging whether a catch was legal.

You're literally making my argument.

Offside makes sense because you're challenging whether possession was legal.

Boldy!

 

[DigitalBoldy]

Matt GOALDY!

 

[Nino Noderreiter]

Not a hand pass.

 

[Minnewildsota]

In bounds vs out of bounds makes more sense in football because you’re challenging whether a catch was legal. The direct result of the catch is determined by whether a player was inbounds or out of bounds.

A goal is not scored because a player was 200 ms early on his entry. It just feels like something that should be in the hands of the linesman. To each their own though, it’s just an opinion and I don’t think it’s ever going away.

Offsides determines if zone entry was legal. It's the exact same thing.

 

[Wasted Talent]

Is a hand pass even reviewable?

 

[Spurgeon]

I hate this f***ing game

You're literally making my argument.

Offside makes sense because you're challenging whether possession was legal.

Boldy!

Not Boldy, blue line

 

[Nino Noderreiter]

That is onside

 

[DigitalBoldy]

If they call that offsides...

 

[MNNumbers]

You're literally making my argument.

Offside makes sense because you're challenging whether possession was legal.

Boldy!

No. He is arguing that something like a holding call in NFL football, or a false start, or a defensive offside, is equivalent. Those things are NOT the play, but they affect the play which comes later.

In the same way that those penalties are not reviewable, there is a decent argument to be made about offside in hockey as well.

It affects the play. It is NOT the play that scores the goal.

 

[TaLoN]

Is a hand pass even reviewable?

Review is for offside

 

[TaLoN]

Damn

 

[DigitalBoldy]

That is bullshit.

 

[Wild11MN]

here we go again

 

[MNNumbers]

I can't watch it. Just tell me. Was it offside?

 

[DigitalBoldy]

That is absolutely egregious misuse of what offsides review is for.