Toggle sidebar

GDT: G69: Bruins @ Wild 1pm CT, 7pm Sweden, 8pm Lapa (BSN)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wabit said:
So just a dumb thing to complain about with no thought added, gotcha.
Click to expand...

I’ve added plenty of thought on my opinion on reviewing pointless things that have no actually impact on a goal being scored. Feel free to read it, I don’t have time to continue these conversations that are just going in circles. Everyone has their opinion on this, so why continue to waste time?
 
Spurgeon said:
I’ve added plenty of thought on my opinion on reviewing pointless things that have no actually impact on a goal being scored. Feel free to read it, I don’t have time to continue these conversations that are just going in circles. Everyone has their opinion on this, so why continue to waste time?
Click to expand...
It is strange to try to ask for something even more pointless to review than to discuss whether the existing review is pointless or not.

How about a discussion between existing reviews? Offside vs goaltender interference? Offside, not pointless, goaltender interference, pointless.
 
Spurgeon said:
I’ve added plenty of thought on my opinion on reviewing pointless things that have no actually impact on a goal being scored. Feel free to read it, I don’t have time to continue these conversations that are just going in circles. Everyone has their opinion on this, so why continue to waste time?
Click to expand...

Offsides isn't pointless to a goal being scored. A review doesn't happen unless a goal is actually scored. A missed offsides isn't reviewed if a goal isn't scored within the same o-zone possession. It's 100% player controllable to stay onside. The refs get the blame for not getting right when it happened just like every other call they make or don't make. It's the players are the ones that are really at fault for being offsides in the first place.

The argument (really, an icing tangent WTF) is a house of cards built on the "I don't like reviews so it shouldn't be part of the game" and then try to justify that with randomness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael89 and TaLoN
f7ben said:
I ain’t never seen no plants grow in a toilet!!!
Click to expand...

crazy-toilet-planter4.jpg


No. Surprisingly (probably) these aren't mine...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TaLoN
So you couldn't score first the last 3-4 games, Majo? You had to wait till today when I was done with you and picked Ek? Really? That's how you want to play it?
 
Wabit said:
Offsides isn't pointless to a goal being scored. A review doesn't happen unless a goal is actually scored. A missed offsides isn't reviewed if a goal isn't scored within the same o-zone possession. It's 100% player controllable to stay onside. The refs get the blame for not getting right when it happened just like every other call they make or don't make. It's the players are the ones that are really at fault for being offsides in the first place.

The argument (really, an icing tangent WTF) is a house of cards built on the "I don't like reviews so it shouldn't be part of the game" and then try to justify that with randomness.
Click to expand...

An illegal dump-in that results in the offending team to gain control and subsequently score a goal has exactly the same effect as a team gaining the offensive zone on an illegal offsides.

Neither of them are worth disallowing a goal over because they did not ultimately lead to being the main benefactor of the goal.

TaLoN said:
It is strange to try to ask for something even more pointless to review than to discuss whether the existing review is pointless or not.

How about a discussion between existing reviews? Offside vs goaltender interference? Offside, not pointless, goaltender interference, pointless.
Click to expand...

You were the one that wanted to only discuss clear and obvious rules like a skate being over a line.

And yeah, they should remove GI reviews. If a goalie gets plowed over and a ref misses it, that’s on the goalie.
 
Spurgeon said:
An illegal dump-in that results in the offending team to gain control and subsequently score a goal has exactly the same effect as a team gaining the offensive zone on an illegal offsides.

Neither of them are worth disallowing a goal over because they did not ultimately lead to being the main benefactor of the goal.
Click to expand...

Offsides goals should 100% be disallowed. It's a clear cut player of puck in the zone first. If the lineman gets it wrong then it's corrected as if he did get it right. The Wild just need to stop being sloppy and stay onside, it's something the players have had to deal with since they played full ice games at age 6 or 7.

Icing is a race to the puck, line changes, goalie playing it, etc. judgement calls that can negate it; on top of a puck on stick at the center ice line call. If it needs a review rule, then fine make a review for it. Really it's just a strawman argument.

But hey if you can get it pushed though, it'll be another way for Evason to lose a challenge and MN goes on the PK. So yay for stuff I guess.

Puck over the glass (delay of game) not being reviewable would have been a better choice for a comparison argument. It's black and white and play is already stopped because of it. Easy review right after it happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 57special and TaLoN
This is getting weird yall. Some people don't like reviews (I'm in that camp) some like them, or at least feel like they add value. I don't think anyone's going to be changing their minds here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TaLoN
Soldier13Fox said:
This is getting weird yall. Some people don't like reviews (I'm in that camp) some like them, or at least feel like they add value. I don't think anyone's going to be changing their minds here.
Click to expand...

Not Weird. Wild. :naughty:

I really don't care either way about reviews. They are a lesser evil than the adds on the ice/boards or Walz speaking for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Soldier13Fox
Personally I’d like to see Zucc shoot when he’s standing in front of the net on a 5 on 3 rather than pass through sticks.

Walz should never be allowed in the booth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom