UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
Thanks, let's put that one to bed.
I think it was more meant for next offseason when Marner, Nylander and Matthew's are RFAs. They would look at 2020 picks the for compensation
Thanks, let's put that one to bed.
just means that lou is gonna offer marner 10.5m per next summer.Thanks, let's put that one to bed.
That's exactly what I'm thinking like if the price is too high then I'm fine not having him but if we get him at a reasonable price then I'm good for it100% depends on what we're giving up, for me.
If it's Hayes, Spooner, and Zuccarello? Sure.
If it's Andersson, Hajek, 1st, 1st? GTFO.
Skjei Hayes smith and Tampa’s pick
Ryan and Karlsson
That's a 'Hell no'.Skjei Hayes smith and Tampa’s pick
Ryan and Karlsson
I'd include Andersson to get Karlsson, I think we reached on him there, by no means am I saying he's a bust, but if you can get EK for the 7th overall pick you kinda gotta do it.
still not sure how you do that with ALL of Staal, Henrik, Shattenkirk, Zucc (even though he's up for FA) on the books, as well as a decision needing to be made on Hayes.
That's a 'Hell no'.
No you don't.
Staal sucks and won't (shouldn't) play much. He's a hit away from LITR.
Henrik is here until he doesn't want to be
Shatt too.
Zucc and Hayes may not be here a week from now, let alone a year from now.
3/5 on this oneTo be exact they will:
- ask him some questions about Namestnikov signing
- ask about the defenseman they signed yesterday
- ask what else they're planning to do in free agency, to which he'll reply that "they're talking to a bunch of guys, and the price was a bit too high for some of the other guys that have been signed already"
- ask about potential trades, to which he'll say they're "open to a lot of things, and having conversations, and seeing how things play out"
- and finally they'll ask about the remaining RFA's, and he'll say "the conversation is on going, and they're hoping to get them done soon"
Agreed --> I see it as that we'd be the middleman and take on Ryan's deal and get an asset in order to do so. So it'll be two separate transactions, where we'll send a weaker package to Ottawa to get Karlsson and Ryan, but flip Karlsson to Vegas for something like Suzuki/Glass and Colin Miller as a base.
I'm sure there's a way to work out a three-way deal in here somewhere.
Not sure trading Skjei makes sense for this organization right now.
I'd give them DeAngelo for sure.
Eh I think it makes more sense than one would think.
We're loaded with LHD. 2 of them are relatively close to being NHL ready. Even if we move him, we have NHL experienced bodies in Staal and Smith. Stop gap LHD's are not hard to find.
They don't need all of their LHD prospects to hit either, just 2. If you have a legitimate #1 RHD, that will mask any deficiency his partner may have. EK could literally drag a garbage can around the ice and make it work, which he's basically done in Ottawa and would do here if he were paired with Staal.
Regardless if those 2 want to be here or not, it still isn't a true rebuild when you have those kinds of players on the team, when/if Hayes/Zucc are traded then I'll believe this is a true rebuild, because it makes little sense to keep them if they're not going to be contending for 3+ years
and you'll be lucky to find a pick a #7 thats anywhere near as good as Karlsson.
That makes sense but Nylander is an RFA this summer.I think it was more meant for next offseason when Marner, Nylander and Matthew's are RFAs. They would look at 2020 picks the for compensation
Lol it's a true rebuild and has been since they traded away half of their roster. They traded away their captain, fired AV and hired a college coach, made all their picks at the draft and stayed the hell out of UFA.
Again what more proof do you need?
I think this package would need another 2nd and I also would like to find a way to sub Buch for something else.Pionk/ADA, Buch, Spooner 2019 2nd.
I think Skjei's value is at a low right now, and will only go up over the next 2 seasons. Especially if he gets partnered with Karlsson. I just dont think A) Its good asset maximization and B) It makes sense to create a hole at #1LD losing a 24 yar old to fix #1RD with a 28 year old.