All true, but to be fair Chara was a FA, this would obviously cost us some assets.
If Vegas was going to move Glass, then Karlsson would already be a Golden Knight. I doubt Suzuki is on the table either, but that would be nice because Gorton and co are high on Suzuki.Agreed --> I see it as that we'd be the middleman and take on Ryan's deal and get an asset in order to do so. So it'll be two separate transactions, where we'll send a weaker package to Ottawa to get Karlsson and Ryan, but flip Karlsson to Vegas for something like Suzuki/Glass and Colin Miller as a base.
I'm sure there's a way to work out a three-way deal in here somewhere.
Brooks have basically two sources: NYR FO and Lou.
Based on how Gorton stayed the line so far Lou is probably a more reasonable source here.
If the Rangers are in, similar to how Chara was brought in before, the cost to the Rangers should be nominal if Ryan’s contract is coming back too.
I'd add our 2019 1st to make it DeAngelo if that was entirely necessary to push the trade over the edgeI consider Ryan to be a big negative...my offer would be...
Hayes spooner and DeAngelo or pionk. 3 roster players. They can move or re up Hayes
It's a low offer...but it's all I'd offer.
I know, it was just me spitballing. It’s definitely interesting to see what we can do to facilitate a deal. IF we can get a kid like Suzuki or Glass, that would be incredible at how Gorton managed to add so many quality prospects in a two-year span.If Vegas was going to move Glass, then Karlsson would already be a Golden Knight. I doubt Suzuki is on the table either, but that would be nice because Gorton and co are high on Suzuki.
I consider Ryan to be a big negative...my offer would be...
Hayes spooner and DeAngelo or pionk. 3 roster players. They can move or re up Hayes
It's a low offer...but it's all I'd offer.
Hank deserves one more shot at a cup.
0% chance I offer either of Chytil or Andersson.So lets say we are in on Karlsson. What is the most you would offer?
I would imagine they would want 1 of Skjei/Pionk/Hajek/Miller, 1 of Andersson/Chytil, and picks.
I'd honestly trade Buch over HayesI consider Ryan to be a big negative...my offer would be...
Hayes spooner and DeAngelo or pionk. 3 roster players. They can move or re up Hayes
It's a low offer...but it's all I'd offer.
0% chance I offer either of Chytil or Andersson.
Thats one service. He was also #36 on ISS, and #28 on FC. Redline had him at #11. First question isn't singling out Kravtsov. Its almost every selection they make. Maybe Kravtsov was closer, but last year the concensus ranking was was off for both first rounder.
Lindbom was selected at #39. Consensus ranking was about #98.
The questions i want to see posed should address they why, and also what they didnt like about some of the other players.
Agreed --> I see it as that we'd be the middleman and take on Ryan's deal and get an asset in order to do so. So it'll be two separate transactions, where we'll send a weaker package to Ottawa to get Karlsson and Ryan, but flip Karlsson to Vegas for something like Suzuki/Glass and Colin Miller as a base.
I'm sure there's a way to work out a three-way deal in here somewhere.
NYR would have to shed some serious salary in order to handle both Bobby Ryan and what Karlsson would want on an extension (14-15 million per) as of summer 2019.
It's a lot of moving parts, but it makes the most sense. Vegas gets their guy eithwit Ryan. Rangers get some building blocks. Ottawa sheds cap and gets a couple pieces to build with as well.
For the Rangers, why take on Ryan if it isn't seriously worth their while? Why sign Karlsson and then have $18m+ tied up before you know what you have with these kids?
As far as pieces leaving NY, Ottawa isn't doing the deal for peanuts. They'll want a good young player coming back. Send Skjei and sign de Haan? Hayes? Zucc isn't going to be of interest because he'll bolt next summer. Ottawa is facing down the loss of their first rounder next year. They're going go want guys who can help them push for the playoffs.
Staal, Shatty, HL and Smith will be off the books. Girardi's hit will be 1.1M instead of 3.6Sounds like EK wants 11.
But yeah they'd need to shed a few bodies. Zucc coming off the books helps, but they're going to be up against it when the next wave of youngin's are RFA's.
It would be real tough. Wonder if Shattenkirk would be moved in that scenario. Unless Smith or Staal can be moved without retaining a ton.Sounds like EK wants 11.
But yeah they'd need to shed a few bodies. Zucc coming off the books helps, but they're going to be up against it when the next wave of youngin's are RFA's.
It's a lot of moving parts, but it makes the most sense. Vegas gets their guy eithwit Ryan. Rangers get some building blocks. Ottawa sheds cap and gets a couple pieces to build with as well.
For the Rangers, why take on Ryan if it isn't seriously worth their while? Why sign Karlsson and then have $18m+ tied up before you know what you have with these kids?
As far as pieces leaving NY, Ottawa isn't doing the deal for peanuts. They'll want a good young player coming back. Send Skjei and sign de Haan? Hayes? Zucc isn't going to be of interest because he'll bolt next summer. Ottawa is facing down the loss of their first rounder next year. They're going go want guys who can help them push for the playoffs.