Speculation: Free Agent Frenzy Part II - Who is left?

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
What role is HL playing in this?

Would he force Gorton's hand? Would he woo EK65?
 
All true, but to be fair Chara was a FA, this would obviously cost us some assets.

Brooks have basically two sources: NYR FO and Lou.

Based on how Gorton stayed the line so far Lou is probably a more reasonable source here.

If the Rangers are in, similar to how Chara was brought in before, the cost to the Rangers should be nominal if Ryan’s contract is coming back too.
 
Agreed --> I see it as that we'd be the middleman and take on Ryan's deal and get an asset in order to do so. So it'll be two separate transactions, where we'll send a weaker package to Ottawa to get Karlsson and Ryan, but flip Karlsson to Vegas for something like Suzuki/Glass and Colin Miller as a base.

I'm sure there's a way to work out a three-way deal in here somewhere.
If Vegas was going to move Glass, then Karlsson would already be a Golden Knight. I doubt Suzuki is on the table either, but that would be nice because Gorton and co are high on Suzuki.
 
Brooks have basically two sources: NYR FO and Lou.

Based on how Gorton stayed the line so far Lou is probably a more reasonable source here.

If the Rangers are in, similar to how Chara was brought in before, the cost to the Rangers should be nominal if Ryan’s contract is coming back too.

Lou doesnt talk to anyone.

Someone else in the Org does.
 
This is the only real opportunity for Ottawa to move the Ryan contract. I'm not sure what Vegas is willing to give up.
 
"And I know we need that one great player who can make a difference. We’ve identified some who might become available, and if they do, we want to be in position where we’re able to get them." -James Dolan April 18th, 2018

Remember this quote?

Trading for EK doesn't make much sense for our rebuild in my opinion but nothing surprises me anymore. The fact that Brooks broke this leads me to believe that the rumors of us being one of the teams in on this has merit.
 
I consider Ryan to be a big negative...my offer would be...

Hayes spooner and DeAngelo or pionk. 3 roster players. They can move or re up Hayes

It's a low offer...but it's all I'd offer.
I'd add our 2019 1st to make it DeAngelo if that was entirely necessary to push the trade over the edge
 
If Vegas was going to move Glass, then Karlsson would already be a Golden Knight. I doubt Suzuki is on the table either, but that would be nice because Gorton and co are high on Suzuki.
I know, it was just me spitballing. It’s definitely interesting to see what we can do to facilitate a deal. IF we can get a kid like Suzuki or Glass, that would be incredible at how Gorton managed to add so many quality prospects in a two-year span.
 
I consider Ryan to be a big negative...my offer would be...

Hayes spooner and DeAngelo or pionk. 3 roster players. They can move or re up Hayes

It's a low offer...but it's all I'd offer.

I think it’s even bigger negatives - Spoonman, ADA and Gilmour if Ryan’s contract is part of the deal.

Edit: I mean Ottawa is not negotiating from a position of strength since EK could just say “no, I’m playing out the last year” and then they get nothing AND will back to dealing with a need to pay someone to take on Ryan’s contract.
 
Last edited:
Hank deserves one more shot at a cup.

No. No. No. I am a HUGE fan of Henrik, and I hope that he is still on the team when the rebuild yields results. I hope that they can win him a Cup, even if by then he's the backup or a platoon with one of the kid goalies. But we should NOT make moves to try and force the issue. Not only will it not work, but it will backfire. We've seen it too many times. Right now, we're a few years away from competing again, depending on which kids pan out and how quickly they develop. Chasing "one more shot" will put us 10+ years out with no assets to build with.
 
NYR would have to shed some serious salary in order to handle both Bobby Ryan and what Karlsson would want on an extension (14-15 million per) as of summer 2019.
 
Thats one service. He was also #36 on ISS, and #28 on FC. Redline had him at #11. First question isn't singling out Kravtsov. Its almost every selection they make. Maybe Kravtsov was closer, but last year the concensus ranking was was off for both first rounder.

Lindbom was selected at #39. Consensus ranking was about #98.

The questions i want to see posed should address they why, and also what they didnt like about some of the other players.

With absolute minimal time spent watching most of the top kids eligible for this draft I had Kravtsov 9th.

https://hfboards.mandatory.com/threads/olas-top-31-for-the-2018-draft.2483651/

The thing is, there is not consensus ranking. The term should be banned. We all know that teams have different lists. Just read the discrepancy described by McKenzie when polling the scouts. A NHL team’s scouting department consist of like 10 scouts. They do a good job.

The general public get to hear about 1 or 2 or 3 people’s opinion on the draft with some knowledge. Then a bunch of crap amatures copy what they have heard and move a few names around on a board. Fans believe that there is a consensus that don’t exist. Would Evan Bouchard have been a steal at 9? The so called consensus had him top 5. In fact he went 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jas and mike14
Agreed --> I see it as that we'd be the middleman and take on Ryan's deal and get an asset in order to do so. So it'll be two separate transactions, where we'll send a weaker package to Ottawa to get Karlsson and Ryan, but flip Karlsson to Vegas for something like Suzuki/Glass and Colin Miller as a base.

I'm sure there's a way to work out a three-way deal in here somewhere.

It's a lot of moving parts, but it makes the most sense. Vegas gets their guy eithwit Ryan. Rangers get some building blocks. Ottawa sheds cap and gets a couple pieces to build with as well.

For the Rangers, why take on Ryan if it isn't seriously worth their while? Why sign Karlsson and then have $18m+ tied up before you know what you have with these kids?

As far as pieces leaving NY, Ottawa isn't doing the deal for peanuts. They'll want a good young player coming back. Send Skjei and sign de Haan? Hayes? Zucc isn't going to be of interest because he'll bolt next summer. Ottawa is facing down the loss of their first rounder next year. They're going go want guys who can help them push for the playoffs.
 
NYR would have to shed some serious salary in order to handle both Bobby Ryan and what Karlsson would want on an extension (14-15 million per) as of summer 2019.

Sounds like EK wants 11.

But yeah they'd need to shed a few bodies. Zucc coming off the books helps, but they're going to be up against it when the next wave of youngin's are RFA's.
 
It's a lot of moving parts, but it makes the most sense. Vegas gets their guy eithwit Ryan. Rangers get some building blocks. Ottawa sheds cap and gets a couple pieces to build with as well.

For the Rangers, why take on Ryan if it isn't seriously worth their while? Why sign Karlsson and then have $18m+ tied up before you know what you have with these kids?

As far as pieces leaving NY, Ottawa isn't doing the deal for peanuts. They'll want a good young player coming back. Send Skjei and sign de Haan? Hayes? Zucc isn't going to be of interest because he'll bolt next summer. Ottawa is facing down the loss of their first rounder next year. They're going go want guys who can help them push for the playoffs.

Well Zucc could help them there.

Wouldn't do a damn thing for them if they get in but compared to what they have right now, he'd be an upgrade.[/QUOTE]
 
Sounds like EK wants 11.

But yeah they'd need to shed a few bodies. Zucc coming off the books helps, but they're going to be up against it when the next wave of youngin's are RFA's.
Staal, Shatty, HL and Smith will be off the books. Girardi's hit will be 1.1M instead of 3.6

We'll have more than enough space.
 
Sounds like EK wants 11.

But yeah they'd need to shed a few bodies. Zucc coming off the books helps, but they're going to be up against it when the next wave of youngin's are RFA's.
It would be real tough. Wonder if Shattenkirk would be moved in that scenario. Unless Smith or Staal can be moved without retaining a ton.
 
It's a lot of moving parts, but it makes the most sense. Vegas gets their guy eithwit Ryan. Rangers get some building blocks. Ottawa sheds cap and gets a couple pieces to build with as well.

For the Rangers, why take on Ryan if it isn't seriously worth their while? Why sign Karlsson and then have $18m+ tied up before you know what you have with these kids?

As far as pieces leaving NY, Ottawa isn't doing the deal for peanuts. They'll want a good young player coming back. Send Skjei and sign de Haan? Hayes? Zucc isn't going to be of interest because he'll bolt next summer. Ottawa is facing down the loss of their first rounder next year. They're going go want guys who can help them push for the playoffs.

Losing Skjei or Hayes and take on a very expensive bad contract to only get Glass? Not worth it IMHO.
 
Did the presser already happen? If not, when? And will it be aired somewhere?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad