It is not false. The suggestion that Matthews at an 8 year cap hit would be worth more than Mcdavid at the same is silly.
It is false. Matthews never "signed short to try to time a cap jump". That was never reported or indicated at all. In fact, the exact opposite was reported, and even confirmed by Dubas himself.
“That was certainly the intention at the beginning from Auston’s side, they were focused on that [max-term deal],” Dubas said. “We’re very thankful they were willing to move from their desired term."
Matthews was willing to take (and in fact preferred) an 8 year deal, but the Leafs opted for a 5 year deal because it allowed them to keep all of their core together and build around them.
It was also never reported that Matthews on a 8 year deal would have been an abnormal amount, or higher than McDavid's negotiated cap hit percentage. McDavid negotiated 17.67% (which is what their agency would be focused on), and then took a voluntary post-negotiation discount for 16.67% (which actually put him as the abnormality relative to history when exclusively looking at more simplistic, traditional measures). And quite frankly, the truth is Matthews' pre-signing period was a lot, lot closer to McDavid than many like to acknowledge. There's nothing "silly" about Matthews being close to McDavid's post-negotiation discount percentage on a similar 8 year deal.
Fun fact: Even ignoring more accurate measures like per-60, where Matthews had a superior ES P1/60, ES G/60, PP P/60, PP P1/60, and PP G/60, Matthews also had the exact same overall primary points per game at time of signing. The difference in their point totals was entirely secondary assists.
Mcdavid signed pre Vegas when Everyone was expecting it to be an Arizona.
What are you even talking about? McDavid signed July 5th, 2017. Las Vegas was known and already an operating team.
I don’t know if Matthews signs a 3 year deal of course I am guessing as an idea.
Yes, you don't know. That would be incredibly abnormal and unlikely to happen, and would be a significant 180 for Matthews. If Matthews did choose to do that, we would not get him on a 3 year UFA deal through ages 27-29 for cheaper than he would make on an 8 year deal.
We know the cap will be 84.5 under the current agreement Do you honestly think he signs for what 14-16% of 84.5 knowing the cap will jump in 1-2 years?
He will sign an 8 year deal based on the cap at the time, with slight considerations for how the cap is projected to evolve. He is not going to sign based on a 95m+ cap under an 84.5m cap. That's not how contracts work.