- Apr 2, 2008
- 26,512
- 14,845
I just don't understand what even warranted Korpisalo being in line for such a deal. I was so confused this summer when it happened, and I'm still confused. If a guy like Korpisalo is deserving of a 5 year deal, there must be a line up of others. Were other teams prepared to go there? His track record was flat out not very good, and incredibly inconsistent.
For all the shit the Jack Campbell deal gets, he actually put up stellar numbers every year leading up to that. And at least Husso didn't have a track record of not being very good on top of his one good year, plus not a lot of term.
There was probably a fair bit of demand given how many teams don't have a clear #1 goalie, but I'd be willing to bet we were the only team willing to throw out more than 3 years of term.
Husso is a good comparable as far as what he should have gotten. Yeah Detroit isn't happy paying him 4.75M but he's off the books after next season.
Probably had to overpay with term to get him to sign in Ottawa, which is why we shouldn't have signed him, but again Dorion didn't give a crap about risk/reward when he signed it. Just wanted to add the best goalie on the market in his eyes in a desperate attempt to save his own skin.