Ducks in a row
Go Ducks Quack Quack
Hampus Lindholm with a assist on that goal results in him tying his single season career high in points.
Hampus Lindholm with a assist on that goal results in him tying his single season career high in points.
Sick play, miss him and would trade ANY two healthy defensemen we have for him in a heartbeat.
I'd trade Fowler and Klingberg (or anyone else) for him in a secondI too would trade Shattenkirk and White for him.
I'd trade Fowler and Klingberg (or anyone else) for him in a second
Trade the whole group for all I care I don't have attachment to any defensemen we have.It was just a silly thing to say and is not exactly going out on a limb lol. I’d trade 4 of our healthy defenseman for him. Not like we could get much worse.
Other than his +/- you have to squint pretty hard to see the difference between this season and last season for him.
Trade the whole group for all I care I don't have attachment to any defensemen we have.
It's just sad, there was a point when we had like 8 defensemen I didn't want to lose.Completely agree lol. We have one, MAYBE two top 4 defenseman, and the rest are replacement level.
Him Lindholm and one more D would be nice.I wish we kept Hakanpaa.
Dude just won't stop hitting.
I still feel like Hakanpää wanted to test the free agency and didn't want to commit to this team and that's why he was traded. Otherwise it doesn't make sense to me.I wish we kept Hakanpaa.
Dude just won't stop hitting.
Him, Lindholm, and another NHL D-man and suddenly this team is teetering on the playoff line while being almost as far, on the timeline, from contention.Him Lindholm and one more D would be nice.
Can't say I buy the team who's competing for the playoffs as being nearly as far from cup contention as a bottom 3 team.Him, Lindholm, and another NHL D-man and suddenly this team is teetering on the playoff line while being almost as far, on the timeline, from contention.
Not something new GM would likely do.
Hampus Lindholm with a assist on that goal results in him tying his single season career high in points.
Should have held the Bruins out for even more...He is also teamleading +34 while having 34 points so far
Strength of both division and conference play a huge role to being on a playoff contention line (i.e. wild card).Can't say I buy the team who's competing for the playoffs as being nearly as far from cup contention as a bottom 3 team.
I'll give you the first. That's fair. I'd argue we've already been the bottom 3 team so we'd be in better shape in moving forward than say a Nashville type bubble team.Strength of both division and conference play a huge role to being on a playoff contention line (i.e. wild card).
I would say that building a contender from a wild card team is much harder than transition bottom 3 to wild card team.
You mean leading the NHL.He is also teamleading +34 while having 34 points so far
I still feel like Hakanpää wanted to test the free agency and didn't want to commit to this team and that's why he was traded. Otherwise it doesn't make sense to me.
If you're usually not facing easy minutes, you pace for 50 pts and for a +50 rating how was there ever a discussion if he is a #1 defender or not? Sure he is not Erik Karlsson or Scotty Nieds but what Hampus brings to the table is - at least for me - superstar material. With guys like him you usually win championships. And the play above shows, he can be a little bit flashy in the right environment as well. I miss him and Raks so much. Funnily Josh not as much.
I mean...I think that was a good move to trade him for Fleury at the time. We should have tried harder to sign him in the offseason, but I don't disagree with BM's decision at the time.I still feel like Hakanpää wanted to test the free agency and didn't want to commit to this team and that's why he was traded. Otherwise it doesn't make sense to me.
Boston has two #1 defensemen.Never came close to pacing for 50 points as a Ducks in 8 years here. And he isn't even the #1 on Boston. He's a damn good player, but he's slotted absolutely perfectly on arguably the best team in the league.
While I understand missing Lindholm (although he would never have been that player here), I don't understand missing Rakell "so much", he didn't play well at all once not surrounded with exceptional talent.If you're usually not facing easy minutes, you pace for 50 pts and for a +50 rating how was there ever a discussion if he is a #1 defender or not? Sure he is not Erik Karlsson or Scotty Nieds but what Hampus brings to the table is - at least for me - superstar material. With guys like him you usually win championships. And the play above shows, he can be a little bit flashy in the right environment as well. I miss him and Raks so much. Funnily Josh not as much.